Browse > Article

Effect of Supplemental Lighting of Sub-Compensation Intensities on Growth of Rosa hybrida L. 'Vital'  

Choi, Young-Hah (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Kwon, Joon-Kook (National Horticultural Research Institute, RDA)
Choi, Gyeong-Lee (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Kang, Nam-Jun (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Chun, Hee (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Cho, Myeong-Whan (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Seo, Tae-Cheol (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Roh, Mi-Young (Protected Horticulture Experiment Station, NHRI, RDA)
Lee, Seong-Chun (National Horticultural Research Institute, RDA)
Lee, Jae-Han (National Horticultural Research Institute, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.17, no.2, 2008 , pp. 132-137 More about this Journal
Abstract
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of supplemental lighting of low light intensities on growth and yield of rose 'Vital' in a forcing culture. Metal halide lamp (MH), High pressure sodium lamp (HSP), and MH+HSP were used as the light sources, and they were set up at a $310\;cm{\times}450\;cm$ interval and at 120cm above the culture beds. Light intensity at 1m point distance from supplemental lighting sources was $32{\sim}34\;{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$. Days to the 1st and 2nd harvests decreased by $5{\sim}8$ and $3{\sim}5$days, respectively in supplemental lighting treatment as compared to the control. Days to harvesting was the shortest in MH+HPS treatment, followed by BPS and MH, although there was no significant difference between HPS and MH treatments. The growth was better and incidence of blind shooting decreased by $5{\sim}7%$ in supplemental lighting treatments than the control, increasing marketable cut flowers. The incidence of blind shoot was the lowest in MH+BPS treatment, and there were no significant difference between MH and BPS treatments. In conclusion, supplemental lighting of low light intensities was effective in reducing days to flowering and reduced occurrence of blind shoots.
Keywords
blind shoot; days to harvesting; rose; supplemental lighting;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Carpenter, W.J. and G.A. Anderson. 1972. High intensity supplementary lighting increase yields of greenhouse rose. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:135-138
2 Kim, J.K., Y.H. Kim, M.G. Lee, and Y.H. Choi. 2003. Analysis of energy consumption by photoperiod in closed transplants production system. Proc. of the Kor. Soc. for Bio-Environ. Control Conf. spring. p. 52-57
3 Lee, K.S., W.H. Kim, B.S. Yoo, E.K. Lee, Y.N. Oh, J.Y. Kim, and B.H. Kim. 2001. Effect of supplementary light on quality and yield of cut rose in winter. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 19(suppl.):104
4 Na, T.S., J.G. Kim, K.J. Choi, G.Y. Gi, and Y.K. Yoo. 2007. Effect of supplemental lighting on the growth and flowering of Rosa hybrida 'Nobles' in winter. J. Bio-Environ. Control 16:130-134   과학기술학회마을
5 Nelson, P.V. 1991. Greenhouse operation and management. 4th ed. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey
6 Hayashi, I. 1991. New techinique for rose cultivation. 2th ed. Seibundoshinkosha, Chiyoda-Ku, Tokyo 1-5-5, Japan. p. 94-97
7 Kim, W.H. 2001. Cultural environment for Rose. p. 100. In: Kim, J.Y. and W.H. Kim(eds.). Rose culture( Standard textbook for farming-120). RDA, Suwon
8 Lee, H.J., J.S. Oh, and Y.B. Lee. 2003. Effects of artificial light source and light intensity on the growth and quality of single-stemmed rose in winter. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 21(suppl.): 89
9 Bredmose, N. 1993. Effects of year-round supplementary lighting on shoot development, flowering and quality of two glasshouse rose cultivars. Sci. Hort. 54:69-85   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Bredmose, N. 1994. Biological efficiency of supplementary lighting on cut roses the year round. Sci. Hort. 59:75-82   DOI   ScienceOn
11 RDA. 2001. Rose culture(Standard textbook for farming- 120). RDA Press, Suwon
12 Menard, C. and B. Dansereau. 1992. Influence of photosynthetic photon flux density and planting scheme on growth and development of cultivar Royalty roses. Sci. Hort. 50:197-207   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Carpenter, W.J., R.C. Rodriguez, and W.H. Carlson. 1972. Effect of daylength on the growth and flowering of roses. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97:135-138
14 (Japan Greenhouse Horticulture Association) JGHA. 2006b. Handbook of protected horticulture. 5th ed. Horticulture Information Center, Tokyo 2-21, Japan. p. 111-115
15 Kim, Y.H. 1998. Growth of plug seedlings raised under fluorescent lamps as artificial light source for close illumination. Proc. of the Kor. Soc. for Bio-Environ. Control Conf. spring. p. 47-54
16 Zandstra, M.B., M.M. Frank, and H.C.M. Schapendonk. 1995. Effects of different light treatments on the nocturnal transpiration and dynamics of stomatal closure of two rose cultivars. Sci. Hort. 61:251-262   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Sarkka, L.E. and E. Christian. 2003. Effects of bending and harvesting height combinations on cut rose yield in a dense plantation with high intensity lighting. Sci. Hort. 98:433-447   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Chung, J.W., Y.S. Lee, K.B. An, G.Y. Lee, and J.W. Lim. 2003. Effects of supplementary light and nutrient concentration on growth and flowering of potted rose. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 21(suppl.):94
19 Kang, Y.G., D.K. Park, and Y.A. Shin. 2004. Promote seedling quality of fruit vegetables with supplemental lighting. Kor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol. 22(suppl.):45
20 Zieslin, N. and M.J. Tsujita. 1990. Response of miniature roses to supplementary illumination. 1. Light intensity. Sci. Hort. 42:113-121   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Mortensen, L.M. and T. Fjeld. 1998. Effects of air humidity, lighting period and lamp type on growth and vase life of roses. Sci. Hort. 73:229-237   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Kim, Y.H. and H.S. Park. 2002. Growth of cucumber plug seedlings as affected by photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux. J. Bio-Environ. Control 11:40-44   과학기술학회마을
23 Menard, C. and B. Dansereau. 1995. Differential response of rose cultivars to light source and nitrogen fertilization. Sci. Hort. 64:117-132   DOI   ScienceOn
24 (Japan Greenhouse Horticulture Association) JGHA. 2006a. Handbook of protected horticulture. 5th ed. Horticulture Information Center, Tokyo 2-21, Japan. p. 110
25 Khui, M.K. and R.A.T. George. 1997. Responses of glasshouse roses to light conditions. Sci. Hort. 6:223-235
26 Mastalerz, J.W. and R.W. Langhans. 1969. Roses. Pennsylvania Flower Growers Association Inc., New York, USA. p. 87