Browse > Article

Optimization of Growth Environment in the Enclosed Plant Production System Using Photosynthesis Efficiency Model  

Kim Keesung (Dept. of Agriculture & Biosystem Eng., University of Arizona)
Kim Moon Ki (Dept. of Agricultural Eng., Seoul National University)
Nam Sang Woon (Dept. of Agricultural Eng., Chungnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.13, no.4, 2004 , pp. 209-216 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was aimed to assess the effects of microclimate factors on lettuce chlorophyll fluorescent responses and to develop an environment control system for plant growth by adopting a simple genetic algorithm. The photosynthetic responses measurements were repeated by changing one factor among six climatic factors at a time. The maximum Fv'/Fm' resulted when the ambient temperature was $21^{\circ}C,\;CO_2$ concentration range of 1,200 to 1,400 ppm, relative humidity of $68\%$, air current speed of $1.4m{\cdot}s^{-1}$, and the temperature of nutrient solution of $20^{\circ}C$. In PPF greater than $140{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$, Fv'/Fm' values were decreased. To estimate the effects of combined microclimate factors on plant growth, a photosynthesis efficiency model was developed using principle component analysis for six microclimate factors. Predicted Fv'/Fm' values showed a good agreement to measured ones with an average error of $2.5\%$. In this study, a simple genetic algorithm was applied to the photosynthesis efficiency model for optimal environmental condition for lettuce growth. Air emperature of $22^{\circ}C$, root zone temperature of $19^{\circ}C,\;CO_2$ concentration of 1,400 ppm, air current speed of $1.0m{\cdot}s^{-1}$, PPF of $430{\mu}mol{\cdot}m^{-2}{\cdot}s^{-1}$, and relative humidity of $65\%$ were obtained. It is feasible to control plant environment optimally in response to microclimate changes by using photosynthesis efficiency model combined with genetic algorithm.
Keywords
chlorophyll fluorescence; JAVA; photosynthesis efficiency model; Principle component analysis; simple genetic algorithm;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Holland, H. J. 1975. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Michigan.: The University of Michigan
2 Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1992 Kautsky effect: 60 years of chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics. Photosynthetica 27:45-55
3 Schreiber, U., W. Bilger, C. Klughammer and C. Neubauer. 1998. Application of the PAM fluorometer in stress detection. In Applications of chlorophyll fluorescence in photosynthesis research, stress physiology, hydrobiology and remote sensing, 151-155.:Kluwer academic publishers
4 Yabuki, K. and H. Miyagawa. 1970. Studies on the effect of wind speed and photosynthesis II-The relation between wind speed and photosynthesis. J. Agricultural Meteorology 26(3):137-142   DOI
5 Plulson M. E., E. E. Gerald and B. John. 2002. Photosynthesis is limited at hight leaf air vapor pressure deficit in a mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana that lacks trienoic fatty acids. Photosynthesis Research 72:55-62   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Balachandran, S., C.B. Osmond, and P.E. Daley. 1994. Diagnosis of the earliest strain-specific interactions between tobacco mosic virus choloroplasts of tobacco leaves in vivo by means of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging. J. Plant Physiology 104:1059-1065
7 Willits, D. H. and M. M. Peet. 1999. Using chlorophyll fluorescence to model leaf photosynthesis in greenhouse pepper and tomato. Acta. Hort. 507:311-315
8 Kitaya Y., J. Tsuruyama, T. Shubuya, M. Yoshida and M. Kiyota. 2003. Effect of air current speed on gas exchange in plant leaves and plant canopies. Adv. Space Res. 31(1):177-182.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim Y. H., and Toyoki Kozai. 1996. Effects of Air Current Speed on the Microclimates of the Plug Stand under Artificial Light. J. Bio. Fac. Env. 5(2):160-166(in Korean)
10 Park, M. H. and Y. B. Lee. 1999. Effects of $CO_2$ concentration, light intensity and nutrient level on the growth of leat lettuce in a plant factory. J. Kor. Soc. Hort. Sci. 40(4):431-435
11 Wilkerson, E. G. and R. S. Gates. 2003. Controlled environment system for studying root zone temperature effects on cutting propagation. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 19(4):483-489
12 He, J., S. K. Lee and I. C. Dodd. 2001. Limitations to photosynthesis of lettuce grown under tropical conditions: alleviation by root-zone cooling. Journal of Experimental Botany. 52(359):1323-1330   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Grantz, D. A. 1990. Plant responses to atmospheric humidity. Plant Cell Environ 13:667-679   DOI
14 Haitz. M., and Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1988. The measurement of Rfd-values as plant vitality indices with the portable field fluorometer and the PAM-fluorometer. In Applications if chlorophyll fluorescence (Lichte nthaler, H. K., ed). pp. 249-254, Kliwer
15 Sicora C., M. Zotan and V. Imre. 2003. The interaction of visible and UV-B light during photodamage and repair of photosystem II. Photosynthesis Research 75: 127-137   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Govindjee 1995. Sixty-three years since Kautsky: Clorophyll a fluorescence. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22:131-160   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Goldbug, D., B. Korb, and K. Deb. 1989. Messy genetic algorithms: motivation, analysis, and first results. Complex Systems 3:493-530
18 Cho, Y. R., D. W. Han., and B. Y. Lee. 1998. Effect of artificial light sources on the growth of crisphead lettuce in plant factory. J. Bio. Fac. Env. 7(1):35-42(in Korean)
19 Strid A., W.S. Chow and J.M. Anderson. 1994. UV-B damage and protection at the molecular level in plants. Photosynthesis Research 39:475-489   DOI   ScienceOn