Browse > Article

Fertilizer Concentration after Flowering Affects Growth and Fruit Setting of Ornamental Pepper  

진영욱 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과)
정순주 (전남대학교 농과대학 응용식물학부)
이범선 ((주)파루 환경제어기술연구소)
강종구 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학 원예학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Bio-Environment Control / v.12, no.2, 2003 , pp. 95-100 More about this Journal
Abstract
To evaluate the effect of the fertilizer concentration after flowering on growth a31d fruit setting of ornamental pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), plants were fertilized with $100\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N ($EC=0.8\;dS{\cdot}m^{-1}) until flowering, and then with 0 (no fertilizer), 100, 200 or $300\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N (fertilizer solution EC of 0.15, 0.8, 1.45 or $2.10\;dS{\cdot}m^{-1}, respectively) until harvest. Maximum leaf area and shoot dry mass at the end of the growing period were obtained when plants were fertilized with $200\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N. Total fruit number per plant at the end of the growing period was not different when plants were fertilized with 100,200 or 300 mg{\cdot}L^{-1}of N concentration. When plants were fertilized with $200\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N, the number of fruits per plant was decreased significantly as compared to 100, 200 or $300\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N, whereas the percentage of red fruits at the end of the growing period was maximized. Total fruit fresh weight per plant at the end of the growing period was highest with the concentration of $200\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N. The EC of the growing medium remained within 0.8 to $1.2\;dS{\cdot}m^{-1}\;2.0\;to\;3.0dS{\cdot}m^{-1}, or 3.0 to 4.5 dS{\cdot}m^{-1}when fertilizer concentrations were 100, 200 or $300\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N, respectively. Throughout most of the experiment, the pH of the growing medium remained within 5.4 to 6.2, but dropped to 4.9 near the end of the experiment when fertilizer concentration was 200 or 300\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N. Content of most of the nutrients In the leaf was not affected by the different fertilizer concentration. Only aluminum was significantly affected and decreased linearly with increasing fertilizer concentration. The results from this study indicated that optimal fertilizer concentration after flowering for commercial production of ornamental pepper was 100 or $200\;mg{\cdot}L^{-1} of N. At these concentrations, the EC of the growing medium remained approximately within 0.8 to 1.2 and 2 to $3\;dS{\cdot}m^{-1}, respectively. This appears to be the optimal range for vegetative growth or fruit setting of ornamental pepper plants, and indicates that ornamental pepper can be grown with a fairly wide range of fertilizer concentrations.
Keywords
Capsicum annuum; EC; electrical conductivity; pH;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bailey, D.A. and T. Bilderback. 1997. Alkalinity control for irrigation water used in nurseries and greenhouses. Hort. Info. Lflt. 558. North Carolina Coop. Ext. Serv
2 Evans, RY. and J.L. Paul. 1992. Reducing nitrogen leaching losses in greenhouse roses. Roses Inc. Bul. (May) 57-61
3 Hood, T.M., H.A. Mills, and P.A. Thomas. 1993. Developmental stage affects nutrient uptake by four snapdragon cultivars. HortScience 28:1008-1010
4 James, E.C. and M.W. van Iersel. 2001. Fertilizer concentration affects growth and flowering of subirrigated petunias and begonias. HortScience 36:40-44
5 Judd, L.K. and D.A. Cox. 1992. Growth of New Guinea impatiens inhibited by high growth-medium electrical conductivity. HortScience 27:1193-1194
6 Love, J.W. 1987. Commercial production of potted ornamental peppers. pp. 1-3. In: Horticulture Information Leaflet No. 548, North Carolina Agricultural Extension Service, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
7 Warncke, D.D. and D.M. Krauskopf. 1983. Greenhouse growth media: Testing and nutrition guidelines. Michigan State Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv. Bul. E-1763
8 Starman, T.W. 1993. Ornamental pepper growth and fruiting response to uniconazole depends on application time. HortScience 28:917-919
9 Mills, H.A. and J.B. Jones. 1996. Plant analysis handbook. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. MicroMacro Publishing, Athens, GA
10 van Iersel, M.W. 1999. Fertilizer concentration affects growth and nutrient composition of subirrigated pansies. HortScience 34:660-663
11 Poole, R.T and C.A. Conover. 1992. Fertilizer levels and medium affect foliage plant growth in an ebb and flow irrigation system. J. Environ. Hort. 10:81-86
12 Conover, C.A. and R.T. Poole. 1992. Effect of fertilizer and irrigation on leachate levels of $NH_4-N$, $NO_3-N$, and P in container production of Nephrolepis exaltata Fluffy Ruffle. J. Environ. Hort. 118:771-776
13 Kang, J.G. and M.W. van Iersel. 2002. Nutrient solution concentration affects growth of subirrigated bedding plants. J. Plant Nutr. 25:387-403   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Argo, W.R. and J.A. Biembaum. 1995. The effect of irrigation method, water-soluble fertilization, preplant nutrient charge, and surface evaporation on early vegetative and root growth of poinsettia. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 120:163-169
15 Kent, M.W. and D.W. Reed. 1996. Nitrogen nutrition of New Guinea impatiens 'Barbados' and Spathiphyllum 'Petite' in a subirrigation system. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121:816-819
16 Wright, R.D. 1986. The pour-through nutrient extraction procedure. HortScience 21:227-229
17 Yelanich, M.V. and J.A. Biernbaum. 1993. Rootmedium nutrient concentration and growth of poinsettia at three fertilizer concentrations and four leaching fractions. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 118:771-776
18 Yeager, T.H., R.D. Wright, and S.S. Donahue. 1983. Comparison of pour-through and saturated pine bark extract, N, P, K, and pH levels. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 108:112-114
19 Jones, J.B. and V.W. Case. 1990. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples, p. 389-427. In: R.L. Westerman. Soil testing and plant analysis. Soil Sci. Soc. Amer
20 Armitage, A. and B. Hamilton. 1987. Ornamental peppers: A hot new crop. Greenhouse Grower 5:92-94