1 |
Reddy, K.R., H.F. Hodges, and J.M. McKinion. 1993. A temperature model for cotton phenology. Biotronics 22:47-59
|
2 |
Bazzaz, F.A. 1990. The response of natural eCOSyS-terns to the rising global levels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21:167-196
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Bowes, G. 1991. Growth at elevated CO: Photosyn-thetic responses mediated through Rubisco. Plant, Cell and Environ. 14:795-806
DOI
|
4 |
Bowes, G. 1993. Pacing the inevitable: plants and increasing atmospheric Annu. Rev. Plant Phys-iol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44:309-332
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Chen K, G. Hu, N. Keutgenl, M.J.J. Janssens, and F. Lenz. 1999. Effects of NaCl salinity and enrich-merit on pepmo(So1atium muricatum Ait.). I. Growth and yield. Scientia Horticulturae 81(1):25-41
|
6 |
Chen, K. and F. Lenz. 1997. Responses of strawberry to doubled concentration and phosphorus defi-ciency II. Gas exchange and water consumption. Gar-tenbauwissenschaft 62:90-96
|
7 |
Reddya, K.R, R.R. Robanaa. Hairy F. Hodgesa, X.J. Liua, and James M. McKinionb. 1998. Interactions of enrichment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf characteristics. Environmental and ExperimentaI Botany 39(2):117-129
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Bloom, A.J., F.S. Chapin III, and H.A. Mooney. 1985. Resource limitation in plants: An economy analogy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:363-392
DOI
|
9 |
Conway, T.J., P.P. Tans, and L.S. Waterman. 1994. Atmospheric records from sites in the NOAA/ CMDL air sampling network, In Boden, T.A.. Kaiser. D.R, Sepanski, RJ,, Stoss, F.W. (Eds.), Trends 93. A Compendium of Data on Global Change, ORNL/ CDIAC-65. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Cen-tre, Oak Ridge NationaI Laboratury, Oak Ridge, Ten-nessee, USA, pp. 41-119
|
10 |
Kimball, B.A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 prior Obser-vations. Agron. J. 75:779-778
DOI
|
11 |
Manderscheid, R. and H.J. Weigel. 1995. Do increas-ing atmospheric concentrations contribute to yield increases of German crops? J. Agron. Crop Sci 175:73-82
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
IPCC. 1990. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group 1. Climate change, The IPCC Scien-tific Assessment. In: Houghton, J.T., Ephraums, J.J. (Eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
|
13 |
Hunt, R., D.W. Hand, M.A. Hannah, and A.M. Neal. 1995. Temporal and nutritional influences on the response to elevated in selected British grasses. Ann. Bot. 75:207-216
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Drake, B.G. and O.W. LeadIey. 1991. Canopy Photo-synthesis of crops and native plant communities exposedto long-term elevated Plant Cell Environ. 14:853-86
DOI
|
15 |
Schlesinger, M.Z. and J.F.B. Mitchell. 1985. Model projections of equilibrium climatic response to increased Carbon Dioxide. In: McCaracken, M.C. and Luther, F.M., Editors, 1985. Projecting climatic effects of increasing Carbon Dioxide. DOE-0237, National TeCh-nical Information Service, Springfield, VA
|
16 |
Horie, T, H. Nakagawa, J. Nakano, K. Hamotani, and H.Y. Kim. 1995. Temperature gradient chamber for research on global environment change. III. A system designed for rice in Kyoto. Japan. Plant Cell Environ. 18:1055-1063
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Poorter, H. 1998. Do slow-growing species and nutri-ent-stressed plants respond relatively strongly to ele-vated . Global Change Biol. 4:693-697
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Rawson, H.M. 1992. Plant responses to temperature under conditions of elevated . Aust. J. Bot. 40:473-490
DOI
|
19 |
Reddy, K.R., H.F. Hodges, and J.M. Mckinion. 1995. Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on pigma Cot-ton growth. Aghculture, Ecosystems and Environment 54:17-29
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Arp, W.J. 1991. Effects of source-sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO. Plant, Cell and Environ. 14:869-875
DOI
|