Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2020.30.6.563

Recent Perspectives on Oncoplastic Breast Surgery in Korea  

Kang, Taewoo (Busan Cancer Center (Breast Cancer Clinic), Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Life Science / v.30, no.6, 2020 , pp. 563-569 More about this Journal
Abstract
Oncoplastic surgery (OPS) combines oncologically safe tumor resection with aesthetically satisfying reconstruction of defects using established plastic surgery techniques. OPS is characterized by initial excision as extensive as is beneficial for oncological safety, and, once sufficient resection is complete, displacement or replacement techniques are selected based on remnant volume. The size of the lesion and the individual patient are important factors when considering the appropriate approach, and when pre-operative imaging, including MRI, is used to determine the technique, the complete removal of cancer cells by permanent pathology is essential. A frozen section is used during the operation to reduce the reoperation rate, but it is difficult to cover the entire margin surface theoretically and even harder in practice. A recent report about adequate margins has empowered OPS in its oncological safety. Considering the patients to whom each modality could be applied, basic breast volume is an important factor, and this is influenced by ethnic differences. In Europe or the US, for example, the average breast size is 36D (600 ㎤) and reduction mammoplasty is predominantly used. However, the average size of patients in our institution is 33A (300 ㎤), and so quite different approaches are selected in most cases. New techniques involving radiofrequency and fluorescence have been proposed as safe and easily accessible ways of reducing complications.
Keywords
Breast; breast conserving surgery; cancer; oncoplastic surgery; resection margin;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Agarwal, S., Pappas, L., Neumayer, L., Kokeny, K. and Agarwal, J. 2014. Effect of breast conservation therapy vs mastectomy on disease-specific survival for early-stage breast cancer. JAMA Surg. 149, 267-274.   DOI
2 Aljarrah, A., Nos, C., Nasr, R., Clough, K. B., Bats, A. S. and Lecuru, F. 2012. Updated follow-up of patients treated with the oncoplastic "Crescent" technique for breast cancer. Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) 21, 475-479.   DOI
3 Ananthakrishnan, P., Balci, F. L. and Crowe, J. P. 2012. Optimizing surgical margins in breast conservation. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 4, 585670-585679.
4 Mitchell, S., Lee, H., DuPree, B. B., Beyer, D. C., Ulissey, M. and Grobmyer, S. R., Gass, J., Boolbol, S. and Storm-Dickerson, T. 2019. A novel, adaptable, radiographically opaque, multi-plane continuous filament marker for optimizing tissue identification, radiation planning, and radiographic follow-up. Gland. Surg. 8, 609-617.   DOI
5 Pilewskie, M. and Morrow, M. 2018. Margins in breast cancer: How much is enough? Cancer 124, 1335-1341.   DOI
6 Rose, M., Svensson, H., Handler, J., Hoyer, U., Ringberg, A. and Manjer, J. 2020. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breastconserving surgery in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 180, 247-256.   DOI
7 Resende Paulinelli, R., de Oliveira, V. M., Bagnoli, F., Letzkus Berrios, J., Cezar Chade, M., Bragatto Picoli, L., Dias Santos, T., Bastos de Carvalho, A. P., Jubé Ribeiro, L. F. and Freitas-Junior, R. 2020. Oncoplastic mammaplasty with geometric compensation: Evolution of the technique, outcomes and follow-up in a multicentre retrospective cohort. J. Surg. Oncol. 121, 967-974.   DOI
8 Riina, M. D., Rashad, R., Cohen, S. and Radiation, Z. B. P. 2019. (n.d.). The effectiveness of intra-operative clip placement in improving radiotherapy boost targeting following oncoplastic surgery. Elsevier.
9 Rivera, R. J., Holmes, D. R. and Tafra, L. 2012. Analysis of the impact of intraoperative margin assessment with adjunctive use of MarginProbe versus Standard of care on tissue volume removed. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 4, 868623.
10 Weber, W. P., Soysal, S. D., Fulco, I., Barandun, M., Babst, D., Kalbermatten, D., Schaefer, D. J., Oertli, D., Kappos, E. A. and Haug, M. 2017. Standardization of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 43, 1236-1243.   DOI
11 Williams, B. J., Hanby, A., Millican Slater, R., Nijhawan, A., Verghese, E. and Treanor, D. 2018. Digital pathology for the primary diagnosis of breast histopathological specimens: an innovative validation and concordance study on digital pathology validation and training. Histopathology 72, 662-671.   DOI
12 Zaha, H., Motonari, T., Abe, N. and Unesoko, M. 2020. Fat necrosis in level I oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery focusing on a modified round block technique. Breast Cancer 17, 1375.
13 Clough, K. B., Kaufman, G. J., Nos, C., Buccimazza, I. and Sarfati, I. M. 2010. Improving breast cancer surgery: A classification and quadrant per quadrant atlas for oncoplastic surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 17, 1375-1391.   DOI
14 Au, G. H. T., Shih, W. Y., Shih, W. H., Mejias, L., Swami, V. K., Wasko, K. and Brooks, A. D. 2012. Assessing breast cancer margins ex vivo using aqueous quantum-dot-molecular probes. Int. J. Surg. Oncol. 1, 861257.
15 Azu, M., Abrahamse, P., Katz, S. J., Jagsi, R. and Morrow, M. 2009. What is an adequate margin for breast-conserving surgery? Ann. Surg. Oncol. 17, 558-563.   DOI
16 Barellini, L., Marcasciano, M., Torto, Lo, F., Fausto, A., Ribuffo, D. and Casella, D. 2019. Intraoperative ultrasound and oncoplastic combined approach: An additional tool for the oncoplastic surgeon to obtain tumor-free margins in breast conservative surgery-A 2-year single-center prospective study. Clin. Breast Cancer http://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2019.10.004
17 Bertozzi, N., Pesce, M., Santi, P. L. and Raposio, E. 2017. Oncoplastic breast surgery: comprehensive review. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 21, 2572-2585.
18 Chatterjee, A., Gass, J., Patel, K., Holmes, D., Kopkash, K., Peiris, L., Peled, A., Ryan, J., El-Tamer, M. and Reiland, J. 2019. A consensus definition and classification system of oncoplastic surgery developed by the american society of breast surgeons. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26, 3436-3444.   DOI
19 Kaufman, C. S. 2019. Increasing role of oncoplastic surgery for breast cancer. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 21, 111.   DOI
20 Knowles, S., Maxwell, J., Lumsden, A., Pearson, L., Pulhin, J. and McLean, J., Brackstone, M. and Hanrahan, R. 2020. An alternative to standard lumpectomy: a 5-year case series review of oncoplastic breast surgery outcomes in a Canadian setting. Can. J. Surg. 63, E46-E51.   DOI
21 Kosasih, S., Tayeh, S., Mokbel, K. and Kasem, A. 2020. Is oncoplastic breast conserving surgery oncologically safe? A meta-analysis of 18,103 patients. Am. J. Surg. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.12.019
22 Lai, H. W., Mok, C. W., Chang, Y. T., Chen, D. R., Kuo, S. J. and Chen, S. T. 2020. Endoscopic assisted breast conserving surgery for breast cancer: Clinical outcome, learning curve, and patient reported aesthetic results from preliminary 100 procedures. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. http://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.02.020
23 Mercan, E., Mehta, S., Bartlett, J., Shapiro, L. G., Weaver, D. L. and Elmore, J. G. 2019. Assessment of machine learning of breast pathology structures for automated differentiation of breast cancer and high-risk proliferative lesions. JAMA Netw. Open. 2, e198777. http://doi.org/10.1001/ jamanetworkopen.2019.8777   DOI
24 Lee, D., Jung, B. K., Roh, T. S. and Kim, Y. S. 2020. Ultrasonic dissection versus electrocautery for immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction. Arch. Plast. Surg. 47, 20-25.   DOI
25 Macmillan, R. D. and McCulley, S. J. 2016. Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: What, when and for whom? Curr. Breast Cancer Rep. 8, 112-117.   DOI