1 |
Andersson, L. and Rova, J. H. 1999. The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae). Plant Syst Evol 214, 161-186.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Chung, M. 2000. Spatial structure of three populations of Hemerocalis hakuuensis. Bot Bull Acad Sci 41, 231-236.
|
3 |
Chung, M. G. and Kang, S. S. 1994. Morphometric analysis of the genus Hemerocallis L. (Lilisceae) in Korea. J Plant Res 107, 165-175.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783-791.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Golenberg, E. M., Clegg, M. T., Durbin, M. L., Doebley, J. and Ma, D. P. 1993. Evolution of a noncoding region of the chloroplast genome. Mol Phylogenet Evol 2, 52-64.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Han, H. M. 1996. Detection of genetic variability in daylily genus (Hemerocallis) using randomly amplified polymorphic DNAs. Donguk University, MS.
|
7 |
Kang, S. S. and Chung, M. G. 1994. Hemerocallis hakuunensis (Liliaceae) in Korea. Sida 16, 23-31.
|
8 |
Kumar, S. and Gadagkar, S. R. 2001. Disparity Index: A simple statistic to measure and test the homogeneity of substitution patterns between molecular sequences. Genetics 158, 1321-1327.
|
9 |
Kwon, K. S. 1980. Morphological and cytological studies on the genus Hemerocallis in Korea. Ewha Womans University, MS., Seoul.
|
10 |
Lee, T. B. 2003. Coloured Flora of Korea. Hyangmoon Publishing Co., Seoul, Korea.
|
11 |
Matsuoka, N. and Hotta, M. 1966. Classification of Hemerocallis in Japan and its vicinity. Acta Phytotax Geobot 22, 22-25.
|
12 |
Noguchi, J. and Hong, D. 2004. Multiple origins of the Japanese nocturnal Hemerocalis citrina. Int J Plant Sci 16, 219-230.
|
13 |
Noguchi, J., Hong, D. and Grant, W. F. 2004. The historical evolutionary development of Hemerocallis middendorfii (Hemerocallidaceae) revealed by non-coding regions in chloroplast DNA. Plant Syst Evol 247, 1-22.
|
14 |
Oxelman, B., Liden, M. and Berglund, D. 1997. Chloroplast rps16 intron phylogeny of the tribe Sileneae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Syst Evol 206, 393-410.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Saitou, N. and Nei, M. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4, 406-425.
|
16 |
Stout, A. B. 1935. The lemon daylily (Hemerocallis flava L.): its origin and status. New York Bot Gard 36, 61-68.
|
17 |
Shaw, J., Lickey, E. B., Beck, J. T., Farmer, S. B., Liu, W., Miller, J., Siripun, K. C., Winder, C. T., Schilling, E. E. and Small, R. L. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. Am J Bot 92, 142-166.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Swofford, D. L. 2003. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates, Inc. MA.
|
19 |
Stout, A. B. 1933. The flowering habits of daylilies. New York Bot Gard 34, 25-32.
|
20 |
Stout, A. B. 1941. The inflorescence in Hemerocallis - 1. Bull Torr Bot Club 73, 134-154.
|
21 |
Tajima, F. 1989. Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585-595.
|
22 |
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M. and Kumar, S. 2011. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731-2739.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Zomlefer, W. B. 1998. The genera of Hemerocallidaceae in the south-eastern United States. Harv Pap Bot 3, 113-145.
|
24 |
Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
|