Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2010.20.11.1704

The Scientific Research of Rehabilitation Training Program Participants in Stroke Patients  

Jin, Young-Wan (Department of Special Physical Education, Dong-Eui University)
Publication Information
Journal of Life Science / v.20, no.11, 2010 , pp. 1704-1710 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the biomechanical characteristics of stroke patients. These characteristics were obtained during walking on a Zebris system, cinematography system and EMG system. Seven female stroke patients participated in this study. The magnitude of the profiles (joint peak angle, joint peak moments, foot pressure COP, EMG data) correlated with rehabilitation training duration using t-test. The significance level selected for this study was p<0.05, t-test. Joint analysis identified significant differences in hip joint peak angle and hip joint peak moment. Foot pressure verified significant differences in gait line length of COP. The EMG signal proved significant differences in rectus femoris and vastus lateralis.
Keywords
Stroke patients; rehabilitation program; joint angle & moment; COP; EMG signal;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Nihat, O. and N. Margareta. 1991. Fundamentals of Biomechanics. pp. 99-102, 1th eds., Springer-verlag. New York.
2 Oh, Y. J. and C. M. Lee. 2009. Research of 3-axis impulse acceleration of lower limb joint at walking. J. Ergonomics Society 28, 33-39.   DOI
3 Robert, C., P. H. John, and R. N. Charles. 1992. Human Anatomy and Physiology. pp. 310-311, 2th eds., New Jersey.
4 Shao, Q. and S. B. Thomas. 2008. A biomechanical model to estimate corrective changes in muscle activation patterns for stroke patients. J. Biomechanics 41, 3097-3100.   DOI
5 Sharon, K. and K. Moran. 2008. Gait pattern categorization of stroke participants with equinus deformity of the foot. Gait Posture 27, 144-151.   DOI
6 Shin, H. D. 1999. The win of stroke patient. pp. 29-32, 1th eds. Seoul.
7 Susan, J. H. 2003. Basic Biomechanics. pp. 232-235, 4th eds., McGraw Hill. New York.
8 Wolf, S. L., A. J. Bulter, J. L. Alberts, and M. W. Kim. 2005. Contemporary linkages between EMG, kinetics and stroke rehabilitation. J. Electromyog. Kinesiol. 15, 229-239.   DOI
9 Alexander, C. H., H. Mirjam, J. W. Ilse, and J. Duysens. 2005. A review of standing balance recovery from stroke. Gait Posture 22, 267-281.   DOI
10 Chihiro, M., O. Shohei, and S. Morita. 2009. Analysis of stroke patient walking dynamics using a tri-axial accelerometer. Gait Posture 30, 60-64.   DOI
11 Hochstenbach, J., R. Donders, T. Mulder, J. van Limbeek, and H. Schoonderwaldt. 1996. Long-term outcome after stroke. a disability-orientated approach. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 19, 189-200.   DOI
12 Jin, Y. W. 2009. The comparison research on walking pattern of rehabilitation training program participants in stroke patients. J. Life Sci. 19, 1299-1303.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
13 Statistics Korea. http://kr.blog.yahoo.com/jjcury/1469.
14 Maria, C. K. and J. E. Janice. 2004. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles on persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed. Gait Posture 24, 140-146.
15 Melanie, J. L. and J. E. Janice. 2005. Muscle strength and weight-bearing symmetry relate to sit-to-stand . performance in individuals with stroke. Gait Posture 22, 126-131.   DOI