Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2008.18.11.1532

Biomechanical and Physiological Comparative Analysis of the Single-Radius Knee Arthroplasty Systems and Multi-Radius Knee Arthroplasty Systems  

Jin, Young-Wan (Department of Special Physical Education Dong-Eui University)
Kwak, Yi-Sub (Department of Physical Education, Dong-Eui University)
Publication Information
Journal of Life Science / v.18, no.11, 2008 , pp. 1532-1537 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different arthroplasty designs on knee kinematic and lower limb muscular activation for up-stair and down-stair movement. 3-D video analysis of whole body and joint kinematics and EMG analysis of quadriceps and hamstrings were conducted. One-way ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses (p=0.05). The single-radius group exhibited more arthroplasty limb quadriceps EMG and hamstring coactivation EMG than the multi-radius group. Single-radius demonstrated more abduction angular displacement and reached peak abduction earlier than the multi-radius arthroplasty limb. The single- radius the percent body fat showed similar values in the Elderly, Single and Multi-radius group among the periods, however Control group was Lowered among the periods. Single-radius group limb also increased the quadriceps muscle activation level to produce more knee extension moment to compensate for the short quadriceps moment arm. Resting metabolic rate was significantly increased in control group in the period of LI. Energy expenditure was extremely increased in all groups except control group among the periods. We can say this is the exercise effects.
Keywords
Single-radius; multi-radius; kinematic; moment; EMG, %body fat; energy expenditure; metabolic rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mahoney, O. M. 2002. Laboratory demonstration of mechanical and functional advantages of single-radius TKA Design. Proceeding of 69th American academy of orthopaedic surgeons meeting. 3, 442.
2 Gunston, F. H. 1971. Polycentric knee arthroplasty. Prosthetic simulation of normal knee movement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 53, 272-277.
3 Hoshino, A. 1997. A influence of design on the range of motion after total knee arthroplasty. In Niwa, S., S. Yoshino, M. Kurosaka, K. Shina and S. Yamamoto (eds.), pp. 324-329, Reconstruction of the Knee Joint. Spring-Verlag, Tokyo, Hong Kong.
4 Westman, B., L. Weidenhielm, O. Rooyackers, K, Fredricsson, J. Wernerman and F. Hammarqvist. 2007. Knee replacement surgery as a human clinical model of the effects of ischaemia/reperfusion upon skeletal muscle. Clin. Sci. 113, 313-318.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Wang, H., K. J. Simpson, S. Chamnongkich, T. L. Kinsey and O. M. Mahoney. 2005. A biomechanical comparison between the single-axis and multi-axis total knee arthroplasty systems for the stand-to-sit movement. J. Clinical Biomechanics 20, 428-433.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Wang, H., K. J. Simpson, M. Ferrara, S. Chamnongkich, S. Casto, T. L. Kinsey and O. M. Mahoney. 2001. Biomechanical differences exhibited during sit-to-stand between total knee arthroplasty designs of varying radii. XVIIIth Congress of International Society of Biomechanics 309-310.
7 Sharkey, F. P., J. R. Danoff, G. R. Klein and J. Parvizi. 2007. Surgeon energy expenditure during total joint arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 22, 210-212.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Riley, L. H. 1983. History and Evaluation of total Knee Replacement. Baltimore, MD,Williams & Wilkins. 1-4.
9 Jin, Y. W. and Y. S. Kwak. 2004. Strength Evalution of Single-Radius Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Journal of life science 14, 484-489.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Felter, M. E. and J. Dapena. 1989. Three-Dimensional interactions in a two-segment kinetic chain. Part II: Application to the throwing arm in baseball pitching. International Journal of Sport Biomechanics 5, 403-419.   DOI
11 Mahoney, O. M. 1999. Posterior cruciate function following total knee arthroplastry. Journal of Arthroplasty 9, 569-578.   DOI   ScienceOn