Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2007.17.5.728

Effects of pH Adjustment on Characteristics of Surimi Using Pork Leg and Chicken Breast.  

Jin, Sang-Keun (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University)
Kim, Il-Suk (Department of Animal Resources Technology, Jinju National University)
Yang, Han-Sul (Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
Park, Gu-Boo (Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University)
Choi, Yeung-Joon (Bioscience and Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University)
Shin, Taek-Soon (Department of Animal Life & Resource Science, Busan National University)
Kim, Byeong-Gyun (Hansung Foods Co., Ltd.)
Publication Information
Journal of Life Science / v.17, no.5, 2007 , pp. 728-734 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we prepared surimi from pork leg and chicken breast by pH adjustments of 3.0 and 11.0. The content of crude protein, yield, water-holding capacity, redness, yellowness, myoglobin(Mb) and metmyoglobin(metMb) were significantly higher in the surimi manufactured from pork leg at adjustment pH 3.0 compared to the other surimi samples; whereas whiteness, myofibrillar protein, breaking force, deformation and gel strength were lower than other samples(P<0.05). The textural attributes were significantly higher in the surimi manufactured from pork leg at adjustment pH 11.0 compared to the other surimi samples; whereas Mb, metMb, cooking loss, breaking force, deformation and gel strength were lower than other samples(P<0.05). Again, the content of crude protein, yield, pH, breaking force, deformation, gel strength and lightness were significantly higher in the surimi manufactured from chicken breast at adjustment pH 3.0 compared to the other surimi samples; whereas myofibrillar protein, redness and metMb were higher than other samples(P<0.05). The content of myofibrillar protein, deformation, lightness and cohesiveness were significantly higher in the suriml manufactured from chicken breast at adjustment pH 11.0 compared to the other surimi samples; whereas Mb, cooking loss, yield and breaking force were higher than other samples(P<0.05). The chicken breast surimi had superior color and gel characteristics than manufactured from pork leg, and adjustment pH 11.0 had superior whiteness and cohesiveness than the pH 3.0 adjusted sample, however, there were no significant differences in sensory attributes among the surimi samples.
Keywords
surimi; pork leg; chicken breast; pH adjustment; quality characteristics;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 SAS. 1999. SAS/STAT Software for PC. Release 6.11, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
2 Undeland, I., S. D. Kelleher and H. O. Hultin. 2002. Recovery of functional proteins from herring (Clupea harengus) light muscle by an acid or alkaline solubilization process. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50, 7371-7379   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Venugopal, V., A. Kakatkar, D. R. Bongirwar, M. Karthikeyan, S. Mathew and B. A. Shamasunder 2002. Gelation of shark meat under mild scidic conditions: Physicochemical and rheological characterization of the gel. J. Food Sci. 67, 2681-2686   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Woessner, J. F. 1961. The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this amino acid. 119 Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 93, 440-447   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lee, S. K. and J. H. Han. 1999. Effects of washing temperature and pH on the quality of surimi from mechanically deboned chicken meat. Kor. J. Food Sci. 19, 268-277
6 Lee, S. K., J. H. Han, C. G. Kang, M. Lee and B. C. Kim. 1999. Washing solution and cycle affected quality properties of surimi from mechanically de boned chicken meat. Kor. J. Ani.l Sci. 41, 687-696
7 Oehiai, Y., L. Ochiai, K. Hashimoto and S. Watabe. 2001. Quantitative estimation of dark muscle content in the mackerel meat paste and its productions using antisera against myosin light chains. J. Food Sci. 66, 1301-1305   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Luo, Y., R. Kuwahara, M. Kaneniwa, Y. Murata and M. Yokoyama. 2004. Effect of soy protein isolate on gel properties of Alaska Pollack and common carp surimi at different setting conditions. J. Sci. Food Agri. 84, 663-671   DOI   ScienceOn
9 NFI. 1991. A manual of standard methods for measuring and specifying the properties of surimi. Lanier, T. C., Hart, K., Martin, R. E. (Eds.). University of North Carolina Sea Grant College Program, Raleigh, NC, USA
10 Nowsad, A. A. K. M., S. Kanohand and E. Niwa 2000. Thermal gelation characteristics of breast and thigh muscles of spent hen and broiler and their surimi. Meat Sci. 54, 169-175   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Okada, M. 1964. Effect of washing on the jelly forming ability of fish meat. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi. 30, 255- 261   DOI
12 Park, W. J. 1994. Functional protein additives in surimi gel. J. Food Sci. 59, 525-527   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Park, J. W. and M. T. Morrissey. 2000. Manufacturing of surimi from light muscle fish. pp. 23-58, In Park, J. W. (ed.), Surimi and surimi seafood, Marcel Dekker, New York
14 Park, J. D., J. S. Kim, Y. J. Cho, J. D. Choi and Y. J. Choi. 2003b. Optimum formulation of starch and non-muscle protein for alkali surimi gel from frozen white croaker. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32, 1026-1031   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Ha, J. U. and D. K. Woo. 1997. Water holding capacity, cooking loss and gel characteristics of pork heart surimi prepared by washing under antioxidative condition. Kor. J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 17, 226-231
16 Jung, C. H., J. S. Kim, S. K. Jin, I. S. Kim, K. J. Jung and Y. J. Choi. 2004. Gelation properties and industrial application of functional protein from fish muscle-2. Properties of functional protein gel from fish, chicken breast and pork leg and optimum formulation. J. Kor. Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 33, 1676-1684   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Jin, S. K., I. S. Kim, D. H. Kim, K. J. Jeong and Y. J. Choi. 2006. Comparision of yield, physico-chemical and sensory characteristics for chicken surimi manufactured by alkaline adjustment with different raw materials. Kor. J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 26, 431-440   과학기술학회마을
18 Jin, S. K., . S. Kim, S. J. Kim, K. J. Jeong, Y. J. Choi and S. J. Hur. 2007. Effect of muscle type and washing times on physico-chemical characteristics and quality of surimi. J. Food engineer. 81, 618-623   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Joo, S. T., R. G. Kauffman, B. C. Kim and G. B. Park. 1999. TI1e relationship of sarcoplasmic and myofibrillar protein solubility to colour and water-holding capacity in porcine longissimus muscle. Meat Sci. 52, 291-297   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Knight, M. K. 1992. Red meat and poultly surimi. The Chemistry of Muscle Based Food, pp. 222, In Johnston, D. E., M. K. Knight and D. A. Ledward (eds.), The Royal Society of Chemistry, U. K
21 Kristinsson, H. G. and H. O. Hultin. 2003. Role of pH and ionic strength on water relationships in washed minced chicken breast muscle gels. J. Food Sci. 68, 917-922   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Lee, C. M. 1984. Surimi process technology. Food Technol. 38, 69-80
23 Choi, Y. J. and Y. J. Choi. 1999. Optimization of ingredients formulation in low grades surimi for improvement of gel strength. J. Kor. Fish Sco. 32, 556-562
24 Antonomanolaki, R. E., K. P. Vareltzis, S. A. Georgakis and E. Kaldrymidou. 1999. Thermal gelation properties of surimi-like material made from sheep meat. Meat Sci. 35, 429-435
25 AOAC. 1990. Official method of analysis, 15th edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemist., Washington, DC
26 Chen, H. H. 2002. Decoloration and gel-forming ability of horse mackerel mince by air-flotation washing. J. Food Sci. 67, 2970-2975   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Clark, J. M., Jr., and R. L. Switzer. 1977. Experimental biochemistry. Sanfrancisco: W. H. Freeman & Company
28 Smyth, A. B. and E. O'neill. 1997. Heat induced gelation properties of surimi from mechanically separated chicken. J. Food Sci. 62, 350-355
29 Park, J. D., C. H. Jung, J. S. Kim, D. M. Cho, M. S. Cho and Y. J. Choi. 2003a. Surimi processing using acid alkali solubilization of fish muscle protein. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32, 400-405   DOI   ScienceOn