Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2016.22.3.133

Screening of Pumpkin (Cucurbita spp.) Germplasm for Resistance to Powdery Mildew at Various Stages of Seedlings Growth  

Luitel, Binod Prasad (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Kim, Sang Gyu (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Sung, Jung Sook (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Hur, On-Sook (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Yoon, Mun-Sup (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Rhee, Ju-Hee (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Baek, Hyung-Jin (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Ryu, Kyoung-Yul (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Ko, Ho-Cheol (National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
Publication Information
Research in Plant Disease / v.22, no.3, 2016 , pp. 133-144 More about this Journal
Abstract
Powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii) causes severe damage to pumpkin crops grown in open fields and plastic house. Initially, we used ten accessions of pumpkin species; Cucurbita pepo (3), C. maxima (2), C. moschata (2), and C. argyrosperma (3) to study the disease progress in different stages of seedling development. Commercial pumpkin varieties were used as susceptible host for inoculum management and young seedlings were inoculated by dusting powdery mildew spores on the cotyledons, 1-true-leaf and 2-true-leaf seedling stages. Based on initial study, we further evaluated 218 pumpkinaccessions for their resistance to powdery mildew in different seedling stages under plastic house. Area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) and relative AUDPC (rAUDPC) was higher in cotyledonary and 1-true-leaf than 2-true-leaf stage. Seedlings at cotyledons and 1-true-leaf seedling stage displayed more susceptibility to powdery mildew. Based on evaluation of 2-true-leaf stage, IT 110859 and IT 278459 from C. pepo and C. argyrosperma identified as resistant (<0.2). Of the 228 pumpkin accessions, 21 (9.2%) pumpkin accessions consisting of C. pepo (2), C. maxima (5), C. moschata (13), and C. argyrosperma (1) exhibited intermediate resistance (<0.4) to powdery mildew and these accessions are useful to growers for its rational management.
Keywords
Accessions; Cotyledons; Cucurbita sp.; Powdery mildew; Resistant;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Block, C. C. and Reitsma, K. R. 2005. Powdery mildew resistance in the U.S. national plant germplasm system cucumber collection. HortScience 40: 416-420.
2 Cho, M. C., Om, Y. H., Huh, Y. C., Mok, I. G. and Park, H. G. 2003. Two oriental squash varieties resistant to powdery mildew bred through interspecific crosses. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 26: 40-41.
3 Cohen, R. 1993. A leaf disk assay for detection of resistance of melons to Sphaerotheca fuliginea race 1. Plant Dis. 77: 513-517.   DOI
4 Cohen, R., Burger, Y. and Katzir, N. 2004. Monitoring physiological races of Podosphaera xanthii (syn. Sphaerotheca fuliginea), the causal agent of powdery mildew in cucurbits: factors affecting race identification and the importance for research and commerce. Phytoparasitica 32: 174-183.   DOI
5 Cohen, S. and Cohen, Y. 1986. Genetics and nature of resistance to race 2 of Sphaerotheca fuliginea in Cucumis melo PI 124111. Phytopathology 76: 1165-1167.   DOI
6 Cohen, Y., Baider, A., Petrov, L., Sheck, L. and Voloisky, V. 2000. Cross-infectivity of Sphaerotheca fuliginea to watermelon, melon and cucumber. Acta Hortic. 510: 85-88.
7 Cohen, Y. and Eyal, H. 1995. Differential expression of resistance to powdery mildew incited by race 1 or 2 of Sphaerotheca fuliginea in Cucumis melo genotypes at various stages of plant development. Phytoparasitica 23: 223-230.   DOI
8 Davis, A. R., Bruton, B. D., Pair, S. D. and Thomas, C. E. 2001. Powdery mildew: an emerging disease of watermelon in the United States. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 24: 42-48.
9 Aust, H. J. 1986. Microclimate in relation to epidemics of powdery mildew. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 24: 491-510.   DOI
10 Ferriere, H. and Molot, P. M. 1988. Sensibilite du Melon a Sphaerotheca fuliginea en Fonction de L'Etage Foliaire [Sensitivity of melon to Sphaerotheca fuligena depending on foliage]. J. Phytopathol. 121: 250-254.   DOI
11 Hammett, K. R. W. 1977. Taxonomy of erysiphaceae in New Zealand. N. Z. J. Bot. 15: 687-711.   DOI
12 Kim, S. G, Ro, N. Y., Hur, O. S., Gwag, J. G., Huh, Y. C., Rhee, J. H., Sung, J. S., Jung, H. G., Kwon, T. R. and Baek, H. J. 2014. Evaluation of powdery mildew resistance in Cucurbita spp. Korean J. Int. Agric. 26: 544-549.   DOI
13 Kousik, C. S., Levi, A., Ling, K. S. and Wechter, W. P. 2008. Potential sources of resistance to cucurbit powdery mildew in U.S. plant introductions of bottle gourd. HortScience 43: 1359-1364.
14 McCreight, J. D. 2006. Melon-powdery mildew interactions reveal variation in melon cultigens and Podosphaera xanthii races 1 and 2. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 131: 59-65.
15 McGrath, M. T. 2001. Fungicide resistance in cucurbit powdery mildew: experiences and challenges. Plant Dis. 85: 236-245.   DOI
16 McGrath, M. T., Staniszewska, H. and Shishkoff, N. 1996. Distribution of mating types of Sphaerotheca fuliginea in the United States. Plant Dis. 80: 1098-1102.   DOI
17 McGrath, M. T. and Thomas, C. E. 1996. Powdery mildew. In: Compendium of Cucurbit Diseases, eds. by T. A. Zitter, D. L. Hopins and C. E. Thomas, pp. 28-30. APS Press, St. Paul, MN, USA.
18 Mossler, M. A. and Nesheim, O. N. (2005 onwards). Florida crop/pest management profile: squash. Electronic Data Information Source of UF/IFAS Extension (EDIS). CIR1265. URL http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/PI/PI04600.pdf [20 March 2016].
19 Pryor, D. E. and Whitaker, T. W. 1942. The reaction of cantaloupe strains to powdery mildew. Phytopathology 32: 995-1004.
20 Pitrat, M., Dogimont, C. and Bardin, M. 1998. Resistance to fungal diseases of foliage in melon. In: Cucurbitaceae '98, ed. by J. D. McCreight, pp. 167-173. ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA, USA.
21 Schnathorst, W. C. 1965. Environmental relationships in the powdery mildews. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 3: 343-366.   DOI
22 Shin, H. D. 2000. Erysiphaceae of Korea. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Suwon, Korea. pp. 227-235. (In Korean)
23 Takada, K., Kanazawa, K. and Takatuka, K. 1974. Studies on the breeding of melon for resistance to powdery mildew. I. Difference of resistance among varieties and the breeding of the resistant variety "Sunrise". Bull. Veg. Ornamental Crops Res. Stn. Ser. A 1: 59-91.
24 Thomas, C. E., Kishaba, A. N., McCreight, J. D. and Nugent, P. E. 1984. The importance of monitoring races of powdery mildew on muskmelon. Cucurbit Genet. Coop. Rep. 7: 58-59.
25 Thomas, C. E., Levi, A. and Caniglia, E. 2005. Evaluation of U.S. plant introductions of watermelon for resistance to powdery mildew. HortScience 40: 154-156.