Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2019.49.2.101

Pollen morphology and character evolution in the subtribe Neoguillauminiinae (Euphorbiaceae)  

PARK, Ki-Ryong (Department of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Kyungnam University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy / v.49, no.2, 2019 , pp. 101-106 More about this Journal
Abstract
A pollen morphological study was conducted using light and scanning electron microscopy involving six species belonging to the subtribe Neoguillauminiinae. Pollen samples from the six species are tricolporate, and the colpi are surrounded by broad margo, with the widest width in the equator, narrower toward the pole, and rounded at the end. Based on the pollen morphology, pollen of the species in the subtribe Neoguillauminiinae were divided into four types: the Neoguillauminia type (T1), the C. collinus type (T2), the C. casuarinoides type (T3) and the C. paucifolius type (T4). The generic divergence between Neoguillauminia and Calycopeplus was supported by the pollen characters of the size, amb and lumina shape. In particular, the traits of rounded shape in the outline of the polar view and circular lumina, which appear only in the pollen grains of N. cleopatra, support the recognition of Neoguillauminia as a monotypic genus. Calycopeplus oligandrus and C. paucifolius had the same reticulate pattern of pollen grains, supporting Forster's hypothesis that these two species are closely related. On the other hand, the close relationship between the morphologically similar C. collinus and C. casuarinoides was not supported by the pollen characters. Within the subtribe there are two equally parsimonious hypotheses regarding the evolution of exine characters. The first consists of two changes of microreticulate through parallel evolution from the primitive reticulate exine, and the second is that the microreticulate pattern is differentiated from the reticulate state and then reversed to reticulate pollen grains.
Keywords
pollen morphology; Neoguillauminia; Calycopeplus; Neoguillauminiinae; Euphorbiaceae;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Park, K.-R. and J.-H. Lee. 2013. Pollen morphology of subfamily Euphorbioideae (Euphorbiaceae). Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 43: 1-11.   DOI
2 Planchon, M. J.-E. 1861. La vraie nature de la fleur des Euphorbes expliquee par un nouveau genre d'Euphorbiacees. Bulletin de la Societe Botanique de France 8: 29-33.   DOI
3 Punt, W., P. P. Hoen, S. Blackmore, S. Nilsson and A. Le Thomas. 2007. Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 143: 1-81.   DOI
4 Steinmann V. W. and J. M. Porter. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae) based on ITS and ndhF sequence data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 453-490.   DOI
5 Suarez-Cervera, M., L. Gillespie, E. Arcalis, A. Le Thomas, D. Lobreau-Callen and J. A. Seoane-Camba. 2001. Taxonomic significance of sporoderm structure in pollen of Euphorbiaceae: tribes Plukenetieae and Euphorbieae. Grana 40: 78-104.   DOI
6 Thiers, B. 2018 [continuously updated]. Index Herbariorum: a global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. Retrieved May 2, 2019, available from http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/.
7 Webster, G. L. 1975. Conspectus of a new classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Taxon 24: 593-601.   DOI
8 Webster, G. L. 1994. Classification of the Euphorbiaceae. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 3-32.   DOI
9 Bentham, G. 1873. Calycopeplus. In Flora Australiensis 6. L. Reeve & Co., London. Pp. 52-54.
10 Baillon, H. E. 1866. Species Euphorbiacearum: Euphorbiacees Australiennes. Adansonia 6: 282-345.
11 Park, K.-R. and A. Backlund. 2002. Origin of the cyathium-bearing Euphorbieae (Euphorbiaceae): phylogenetic study based on morphological characters. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 43: 57-62.
12 Croizat, L. 1937. Notes on Euphorbiaceae, with a new genus and a new subtribe of the Euphorbieae. The Philippine Journal of Science 64: 397-412.
13 Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method: a revised description. Svensk BotaniskTidskrift 54: 561-564.
14 Forster, P. I. 1995. A taxonomic revision of Calycopeplus Planch. (Euphorbiaceae). Austrobaileya 4: 417-428.