Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2015.45.4.332

Taxonomy of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae): Physocarpus  

Oh, Sang-Hun (Department of Biology, Daejeon University)
Publication Information
Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy / v.45, no.4, 2015 , pp. 332-352 More about this Journal
Abstract
The tribe Neillieae, a small group of about 18 species in the Rosaceae, comprises three taxonomically difficult genera, Neillia, Physocarpus, and Stephanandra. The tribe, characterized by lobed leaves with persistent or deciduous stipules and ovoid, shiny seeds with copious endosperm, is strongly supported as a monophyletic group by a variety of lines of molecular evidence. Due to the high amount of morphological variation across the three genera and the species in tribe Neillieae, conflicting classification schemes and numerous species have been proposed over the past three centuries. However, no comprehensive systematic study of the group, including all species across their geographic ranges, has ever been undertaken. As part of a taxonomic revision of tribe Neillieae, a revision of Physocarpus based on the morphological examination of herbarium specimens, including types, and field observation is presented. Artificial keys, comprehensive nomenclatural treatments, descriptions, distribution maps, and lists of specimens examined are provided. Six species in Physocarpus are recognized. A lectotype is here designated for the following species: Opulaster pubescens, Opulaster ramaleyi, Spiraea opulifolia var. parvifolia, Spiraea opulifolia var. tomentella, Physocarpus michiganensis, and Physocarpus missouriensis.
Keywords
Neillieae; Physocarpus; revision;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Baldwin, J. T. Jr. 1951. Chromosomes of Spiraea and of certain other genera of Rosaceae. Rhodora 53: 203-206.
2 Ball, P. W. 1968. Physocarpus. In Flora Europaea, vol. 2. Tutin, T. G., V. H. Heywood, N. A. Burges, D. M. Moore, D. H. Valentine, S. M. Walters and D. A. Webb (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
3 Bentham, G. and J. D. Hooker. 1865. Genera Plantarum, vol. 1. William Pamplin, Lovell Reeve and Co., Williams and Norgate, London.
4 Blume, C. L. 1826. Bijdragen tot de Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. Ter Lands Drukkerij, Batavia.
5 Blume, C. L. 1855. Melanges botaniques. (a facsimile in Taxon 35: 274-285).
6 Boufford, D. E. and S. A. Spongberg. 1983. Eastern Asian-eastern North American phytogeographical relationships-a history from the time of Linnaeus to the twentieth century. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 70: 423-439.   DOI
7 Briquet, J. 1906. International Rules of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the International Botanical Congress of Vienna 1905. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.
8 Brummitt, R. K. 2005. Report of the committee for Spermatophyta: 57. Taxon 54: 1093-1103.   DOI
9 Cambessedes, M. J. 1824. Monographie des Spirees. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 1: 352-391.
10 Candolle, A. P. de. 1825. Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis, vol. 2. Sumptibus Sociorum Treuttel et Wurtz, Paris.
11 Cullen, J. 1971. The genus Neillia (Rosaceae) in mainland Asia and in cultivation. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 52: 137-158.
12 Daniels, F. P. 1907. The flora of Columbia Missouri and vicinity. The University of Missouri Studies, Science Series 1: 1-319.
13 Don, D. 1825. Prodromus Florae Nepalensis. Veneunt apud J. Gale, London.
14 Fernald, M. L. 1970. Gray's Manual of Botany, ed 8. D. Van Nostrand Company, New York.
15 Gleason, H. A. and A. Cronquist. 1991. Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada, ed. 2. New York Botanical Garden, New York.
16 Greene, E. L. 1889. The North American Neilliae. Pittonia 2: 25-31.
17 Heller, A. A. 1898. New and interesting plants from western North America. III. Bulletin of Torrey Botanical Club 25: 580-582.   DOI
18 Howell, J. T. 1931. A Great Basin species of Physocarpus. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 20: 129-134.
19 Holmgren, N. H. 1997. Physocarpus. In Intermountain Flora, vol. 3, part A, Cronquist, A., N. H. Holmgren and P. K. Holmgren (eds.). The New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 70-72.
20 Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants, vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
21 Jones, M. E. 1893. Contributions to western botany. Zoe 4: 22-54.
22 Kuntze, O. 1891a. Revisio Generum Plantarum, pars I. Arthur Felix, Leipzig
23 Kalkman, C. 1988. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 37-59.   DOI
24 Komarov, V. L. 1932. Species novae plantarum orientalis extremi U.R.S.S. Izvestija Botaniceskogo Sada Akademii Nauk SSSR 30: 189-223.
25 Kruckeberg, A. R. 1982. Gardening with Native Plants of the Pacific Northwest. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
26 Kuntze, O. 1891b. Revisio Generum Plantarum, pars II. Arthur Felix, Leipzig.
27 Lee, S. 2007. Physocarpus. In Genera of Vascular Plants of Korea, Park, C.-W. (ed.), Academy Publishing Co., Seoul. Pp. 538-539.
28 Lee, T. B. 1980. Illustrated flora of Korea. Hyangmunsa, Seoul.
29 Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. Impensis Laruentii Salvii, Stockholm.
30 Manos, P. S. and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. Progress in Northern Hemisphere phytogeography: An introduction. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162 (Supplement): S1-S2.   DOI
31 Manos, P. S. and J. E. Meireles. 2015. Biogeograhic analysis of the woody plants of the southern Appalachians: Implications for the origins of a regional flora. American Journal of Botany 102: 780-804.   DOI
32 Maximowicz, C. J. 1859. Primitiae florae Amurensis. Memoires Presentes a l'Academie Imperiale des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg par Divers Savants et lus dans ses Assemblees 9: 1-504.
33 Maximowicz, C. J. 1879. Adnotationes de Spiraeaceis. Trudy Imperatorskago S.-Peterburgskago Botaniceskago Sada 6: 105-261.
34 Miquel, F. A. W. 1855. Flora van Nederlandsch Indie. Fried. Fleischer, Leipzig.
35 McNeill, J., F. R. Barrie, W. R., Buck, V. Demoulin, W. Greuter, D. L. Hawksworth, P. S. Herendeen, S. Knapp, K. Marhold, J. Prado, W. F. Prud'homme van Reine, G. F. Smith, J. H. Wiersema and N. J. Turland. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi, and Plants (Melbourne Code). Koeltz, Konigstein.
36 McVaugh, R. 1973. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta. Taxon 22: 153-157.
37 Medikus, F. K. 1799. Beytrage zur Pflanzen-Anatomie. Heinrich Graff, Leipzig.
38 Morgan, D. R., D. E. Soltis and K. R. Robertson. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. American Journal of Botany 81: 890-903.   DOI
39 Nakai, T. 1918. Notulae ad plantas Japoniae et Koreae XVII. Botanical Magazine 32: 103-110.   DOI
40 Nelson, A. 1902. Contributions from the Rocky Mountain Herbarium. IV. Botanical Gazette 34: 355-371.   DOI
41 Oh, S. 2004. Proposal to conserve the name Physocarpus opulifolius (L.) Maxim. against Physocarpus opulifolius Raf. (Rosaceae). Taxon 53: 212-213.   DOI
42 Oh, S. 2006. Neillia includes Stephanandra (Rosaceae). Novon 16: 91-95.   DOI
43 Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2003. Phylogenetic utility of the second intron of LEAFY in Neillia and Stephanandra (Rosaceae) and implications for the origin of Stephanandra. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29: 203-215.   DOI
44 Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2005. Molecular phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of tribe Neillieae (Rosaceae) using DNA sequences of cpDNA, rDNA, and LEAFY. American Journal of Botany 92: 179-192.   DOI
45 Potter, D., T. Eriksson, R. C. Evans, S. Oh, J. Smedmark, D. R. Morgan, M. Kerr, K. R. Robertson, M. Arsenault, T. A. Dickinson and C. Campbell. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 5-43.   DOI
46 Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2006. Description and phylogenetic position of a new angiosperm family, Guamatelaceae, inferred from chloroplast rbcL, atpB, and matK sequences. Systematic Botany 31: 730-738.   DOI
47 Oh, S., L. Chen, S. Kim, Y. Kim and H. Shin. 2010. Phylogenetic relationship of Physocarpus insularis (Rosaceae) endemic on Ulleung Island: Implications for conservation biology. Journal of Plant Biology 53: 94-105.   DOI
48 Potter, D., F. Gao, P. E. Bortiri, S. Oh and S. Baggett. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Plant Systematics and Evolution 231: 77-89.   DOI
49 Poyarkova, A. I. 1939. Physocarpus. In Flora of the USSR, vol. 9. Komarov, V. L. (ed.), Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Moskva-Leningrad. Pp. 217-218.
50 Rafinesque, C. S. 1832. 107. Twenty new genera of plants from the Oregon mountains &c. Atlantic Journal, and friend of knowledge 1: 144-146.
51 Rafinesque, C. S. 1838. New Flora of North America. Philadelphia.
52 Raven, P. H. 1972. Plant species disjunctions: A summary. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 234-246.   DOI
53 Rehder, A. 1940. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs Hardy in North America, Exclusive of the Subtropical and Warmer Temperate Regions, ed. 2. Macmillan Company, New York.
54 Robertson, K. R. 1974. The genera of Rosaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 55: 303-332.
55 Reveal, J. L., G. E. Mounton and A. E. Schuyer. 1999. The Lewis and Clark collections of vascular plants: Names, types, and comments. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 149:1-64.
56 Rickett, H. W. and F. A. Stafleu. 1959. Nomina generica conservana et rejicienda Spermatophytorum III. Taxon 8: 282-314.   DOI
57 Robertson, K. R. 1972. Nomina conservanda proposita (329). Taxon 21: 211-212.
58 Rydberg, P. A. 1908. Rosaceae. In North American flora, vol. 22. New York Botanical Garden, New York. Pp. 239-388.
59 Rydberg, P. A. 1922. Flora of the Rocky Mountain and adjacent plains, 2 nd ed. Press of Intelligencer Printing Co., Lancaster.
60 Sax, K. 1931. The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 12: 3-22.
61 Schneider, C. K. 1905. Illustriertes Handbuch der Laubholzkunde. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.
62 Schulze-Menz, G. K. 1964. Rosaceae. In Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien II, Melchior, H. (ed.), Gebruder Borntraeger, Berlin. Pp. 209-218.
63 Shin, H., Y. Kim and S. Oh. 2011. A new combination of Spiraea (Rosaceae) from Ulleung Island, Korea. Novon 21: 373-37.   DOI
64 Small, J. K. 1903. Flora of the southeastern United States. Published by the author, New York.
65 Small, J. K. 1933. Manual of the Southeastern flora. The University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.
66 Tournefort, J. P. de. 1700. Institutiones rei Herbariae. Typographia regia, Paris.
67 Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
68 Tiffney, B. H. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 73-94.   DOI
69 Tiffney, B. H. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 243-273.   DOI
70 Vidal, J. 1963. Le genre Neillia (Rosaceae). Adansonia 3: 142-166.
71 Watson, S. 1876. Descriptions of new species of plants, chiefly Californian, with revisions of certain genera. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 11: 121-148.
72 Welsh, S. L. 1982. Utah flora: Rosaceae. The Great Basin Naturalist 42: 1-44.
73 Wood, C. E. Jr. 1972. Morphology and phytogeography: The classical approach to the study of disjunctions. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 107-124.   DOI
74 Yu, T. and T. Ku. 1974. Physocarpus, Neillia, Stephanandra. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 36. Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 80-98.