Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0090

The Korean Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status-Update : Psychiatric and Neurosurgery Patient Sample Validity  

Park, Jong-Ok (Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Kyungpook National University)
Koo, Bon-Hoon (Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
Kim, Ji-Yean (Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Kyungpook National University)
Bai, Dai-Seg (Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
Chang, Mun-Seon (Department of Psychology, College of Social Science, Kyungpook National University)
Kim, Oh-Lyong (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.64, no.1, 2021 , pp. 125-135 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : This study aimed to validate the Korean version of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Update (K-RBANS). Methods : We performed a retrospective analysis of 283 psychiatric and neurosurgery patients. To investigate the convergent validity of the K-RBANS, correlation analyses were performed for other intelligence and neuropsychological test results. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test a series of alternative plausible models of the K-RBANS. To analyze the various capabilities of the K-RBANS, we compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). Results : Significant correlations were observed, confirming the convergent validity of the K-RBANS among the Total Scale Index (TSI) and indices of the K-RBANS and indices of intelligence (r=0.47-0.81; p<0.001) and other neuropsychological tests at moderate and above significance (r=0.41-0.63; p<0.001). Additionally, the results testing the construct validity of the K-RBANS showed that the second-order factor structure model (model 2, similar to an original factor structure of RBANS), which includes a first-order factor comprising five index scores (immediate memory, visuospatial capacity, language, attention, delayed memory) and one higher-order factor (TSI), was statistically acceptable. The comparative fit index (CFI) (CFI, 0.949) values and the goodness of fit index (GFI) (GFI, 0.942) values higher than 0.90 indicated an excellent fit. The root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) (RMSEA, 0.082) was considered an acceptable fit. Additionally, the factor structure of model 2 was found to be better and more valid than the other model in χ2 values (Δχ2=7.69, p<0.05). In the ROC analysis, the AUCs of the TSI and five indices were 0.716-0.837, and the AUC of TSI (AUC, 0.837; 95% confidence interval, 0.760-0.896) was higher than the AUCs of the other indices. The sensitivity and specificity of TSI were 77.66% and 78.12%, respectively. Conclusion : The overall results of this study suggest that the K-RBANS may be used as a valid tool for the brief screening of neuropsychological patients in Korea.
Keywords
K-RBANS; Convergent validity; Construct validity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arbuckle J : Amos 25.0: computer program [CD-ROM]. Chicago : IBM SPSS, 2017
2 Berg L, Miller JP, Storandt M, Duchek J, Morris JC, Rubin EH, et al. : Mild senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: 2. Longitudinal assessment. Ann Neurol 23 : 477-484, 1988   DOI
3 Bryant FB, Yarnold PR : Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in Grimm LG, Yarnold PR (eds) : Reading an Understanding Multivariate Statistics. Washington DC : American Psychological Association, 1995, pp99-136
4 Byrne BM : Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. J Pers Assess 85 : 17-32, 2005   DOI
5 Cheng Y, Wu W, Wang J, Feng W, Wu X, Li C : Reliability and validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in community-dwelling elderly. Arch Med Sci 7 : 850-857, 2011
6 De la Torre GG, Suárez-Llorens A, Caballero FJ, Ramallo MA, Randolph C, Lleo A, et al. : Norms and reliability for the Spanish version of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) form A. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 36 : 1023-1030, 2014   DOI
7 Emmert N, Schwarz L, Vander Wal J, Gfeller J : RBANS factor structure in older adults with suspected cognitive impairment: evidence for a 5-factor structure. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 25 : 38-50, 2018   DOI
8 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR : "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12 : 189-198, 1975   DOI
9 Gregoire J : ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. Int J Test 18 : 101-134, 2018   DOI
10 Holden HM, Milano NJ, Horner MD : Five-factor structure of the RBANS is supported in an Alzheimer's disease sample: implications for validation of neuropsychological assessment instruments. Appl Neuropsychol Adult 27 : 232-242, 2020   DOI
11 Kang YW, Jahng SM, Na DR : Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery (SNSB-II), ed 2. Incheon : Human Brain Research & Consulting, 2012
12 Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR : Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6 : 53-60, 2008
13 Hughes CP, Berg L, Danziger WL, Coben LA, Martin RL : A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br J psychiatry 140 : 566-572, 1982   DOI
14 Hwang S, Kim J, Park K, Chey J, Hong S : Korean Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, ed 4. Daegu : Korea Psychology, 2012
15 Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S : A validity study on the Korean mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE) in dementia patients. J Korean Neurol Assoc 15 : 300-308, 1997
16 Kang Y, Na DL, Hahn S : Seoul Neuropsychological Screening Battery. Incheon : Human Brain Research & Consulting Co., 2003
17 Kaufman AS : Manual for the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC-II). Circle Pines : AGS, 2004
18 Kim JS, Kim OL, Seo WS, Koo BH, Joo Y, Bai DS : Memory dysfunctions after mild and moderate traumatic brain injury : comparison between patients with and without frontal lobe injury. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 46 : 459-467, 2009   DOI
19 Kwak HW, Kim JY, Park JO, Park HG, Bai DS, Im JM, et al. : Korean Version of Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status: Update. Daegu : Korea Psychology Co., 2018
20 Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. : Development of the Korean version of the consortium to establish a registry for alzheimer's disease assessment packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 57 : P47-P53, 2002   DOI
21 McKay C, Casey JE, Wertheimer J, Fichtenberg NL : Reliability and validity of the RBANS in a traumatic brain injured sample. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 22 : 91-98, 2007   DOI
22 Lee JY, Lee DW, Cho SJ, Na DL, Jeon HJ, Kim SK, et al. : Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 21 : 104-110, 2008   DOI
23 Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Bigler ED, Tranel D : Neuropsychological Assessment, ed 5. New York : Oxford University Press, 2012, pp3-14
24 Loughan AR, Braun SE, Lanoye A : Repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary utility in adult neuro-oncology. Neurooncol Pract 6 : 289-296, 2019
25 Malda M, Van De Vijver FJR, Srinivasan K, Transler C, Sukumar P, Rao K : Adapting a cognitive test for a different culture: an illustration of qualitative procedures. Psychol Sci Q 50 : 451-468, 2008
26 Mattis S : Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa : Psychological Assessment Resources, 1988
27 Moon SB : Manual for Korean K-ABC-II. Seoul : Hakjisa, 2014
28 Morris JC : Current vision and scoring rules The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). Neurology 43 : 2412-2414, 1993   DOI
29 Randolph C : RBANS manual. San Antonio : The Psychological Corporation, 1988
30 Randolph C : RBANS update manual. San Antonio : The Psychological Corporation, 2012
31 Randolph C, Hilsabeck R, Kato A, Kharbanda P, Li YY, Mapelli D, et al. : Neuropsychological assessment of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN practice guidelines. Liver Int 29 : 629-635, 2009   DOI
32 Yamashima T, Yoshida M, Kumahashi K, Matsui M, Koshino Y, Higashima M, et al. : The Japanese version of RBANS (repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status). No To Shinkei 54 : 463-471, 2002
33 Randolph C, Tierney MC, Mohr E, Chase TN : The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS): preliminary clinical validity. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 20 : 310-319, 1998   DOI
34 Suraweera C, Anandakumar D, Dahanayake D, Subendran M, Perera UT, Hanwella R, et al. : Validation of the Sinhala version of the repeatable battery for assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS). Ceylon Med J 61 : 167-170, 2016   DOI
35 Swets JA : Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240 : 1285-1293, 1988   DOI
36 Torrence ND, John SE, Gavett BE, O'Bryant SE : An empirical comparison of competing factor structures for the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status: a project FRONTIER study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 31 : 88-96, 2016   DOI
37 Weclser D : Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, ed 4. Bloomington : Pearson, 2008