Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2019.0071

Efficacy of a Novel Annular Closure Device after Lumbar Discectomy in Korean Patients : A 24-Month Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial  

Cho, Pyung Goo (Department of Neurosurgery, Ajou University College of Medicine)
Shin, Dong Ah (Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Park, Sang Hyuk (Department of Neurosurgery, Hwalkichan Hospital)
Ji, Gyu Yeul (Department of Neurosurgery, Cham Teun Teun Research Institute)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.62, no.6, 2019 , pp. 691-699 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : Lumbar discectomy is an effective treatment for lumbar disc herniation (LDH); however, up to 2-18% of patients with LDH have experienced recurrent disc herniation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a novel annular closure device (ACD) for preventing LDH recurrence and re-operation compared with that of conventional lumbar discectomy (CLD). Methods : In this prospective randomized controlled trial, we compared CLD with discectomy utilizing the $Barricaid^{(R)}$ (Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc., Woburn, MA, USA) ACD. Primary radiologic outcomes included disc height, percentage of preoperative disc height maintained, and re-herniation rates. Additional clinical outcomes included visual analog scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) quality of life scores. Outcomes were measured at preoperation and at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperation. Results : Sixty patients (30 CLD, 30 ACD) were enrolled in this study. At 24-month follow-up, the disc height in the ACD group was significantly greater than that in the CLD group ($11.4{\pm}1.5$ vs. $10.2{\pm}1.2mm$, p=0.006). Re-herniation occurred in one patient in the ACD group versus six patients in the CLD group (${\chi}^2=4.04$, p=0.044). Back and leg VAS scores, ODI scores, and SF-12 scores improved significantly in both groups compared with preoperative scores in the first 7 days following surgery and remained at significantly improved levels at a 24-month follow-up. However, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion : Lumbar discectomy with the $Barricaid^{(R)}$ (Intrinsic Therapeutics, Inc.) ACD is more effective at maintaining disc height and preventing re-herniation compared with conventional discectomy. Our results suggest that adoption of ACD in lumbar discectomy can help improve the treatment outcome.
Keywords
Intervertebral disc disease; Discectomy; Herniated disc; Barricaid;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bouma GJ, Barth M, Ledic D, Vilendecic M : The high-risk discectomy patient: prevention of reherniation in patients with large anular defects using an anular closure device. Eur Spine J 22 : 1030-1036, 2013   DOI
2 Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, O'Cathain A, Thomas KJ, Usherwood T, et al. : Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ 305 : 160-164, 1992   DOI
3 Parker SL, Grahovac G, Vukas D, Vilendecic M, Ledic D, McGirt MJ, et al. : Effect of an annular closure device (barricaid) on same-level recurrent disk herniation and disk height loss after primary lumbar discectomy: two-year results of a multicenter prospective cohort study. Clin Spine Surg 10 : 454-460, 2016
4 Spengler DM : Lumbar discectomy. Results with limited disc excision and selective foraminotomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 7 : 604-607, 1982   DOI
5 Stromqvist B, Fritzell P, Hagg O, Jonsson B; Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons : The Swedish spine register: development, design and utility. Eur Spine J 18 Suppl 3 : 294-304, 2009   DOI
6 Trummer M, Eustacchio S, Barth M, Klassen PD, Stein S : Protecting facet joints post-lumbar discectomy: barricaid annular closure device reduces risk of facet degeneration. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115 : 1440-1445, 2013   DOI
7 Watters WC 3rd, McGirt MJ : An evidence-based review of the literature on the consequences of conservative versus aggressive discectomy for the treatment of primary disc herniation with radiculopathy. Spine J 9 : 240-257, 2009   DOI
8 Davis RA : A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs. J Neurosurg 80 : 415-421, 1994   DOI
9 Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, Kim D : Clinical outcomes after lumbar discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anular competence. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85 : 102-108, 2003   DOI
10 Carragee EJ, Spinnickie AO, Alamin TF, Paragioudakis S : A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy: shortterm outcomes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 653-657, 2006   DOI
11 Gray DT, Deyo RA, Kreuter W, Mirza SK, Heagerty PJ, Comstock BA, et al. : Population-based trends in volumes and rates of ambulatory lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 1957-1963, 2006   DOI
12 Heindel P, Tuchman A, Hsieh PC, Pham MH, D'Oro A, Patel NN, et al. : Reoperation rates after single-level lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 42 : E496-E501, 2017   DOI
13 Kepley AL, Nishiyama KK, Zhou B, Wang J, Zhang C, McMahon DJ, et al. : Differences in bone quality and strength between Asian and Caucasian young men. Osteoporos Int 28 : 549-558, 2017   DOI
14 Ledic D, Vukas D, Grahovac G, Barth M, Bouma GJ, Vilendecic M : Effect of anular closure on disk height maintenance and reoperated recurrent herniation following lumbar diskectomy: two-year data. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 76 : 211-218, 2015   DOI
15 Lequin MB, Barth M, Thome C, Bouma GJ : Primary limited lumbar discectomy with an annulus closure device: one-year clinical and radiographic results from a prospective, multi-center study. Korean J Spine 9 : 340-347, 2012   DOI
16 McGirt MJ, Eustacchio S, Varga P, Vilendecic M, Trummer M, Gorensek M, et al. : A prospective cohort study of close interval computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging after primary lumbar discectomy: factors associated with recurrent disc herniation and disc height loss. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 2044-2051, 2009   DOI
17 Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, Hirabayashi K : Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 652-657, 2001   DOI
18 Martin BI, Mirza SK, Flum DR, Wickizer TM, Heagerty PJ, Lenkoski AF, et al. : Repeat surgery after lumbar decompression for herniated disc: the quality implications of hospital and surgeon variation. Spine J 12 : 89-97, 2012   DOI
19 McGirt MJ, Ambrossi GL, Datoo G, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Wolinsky JP, et al. : Recurrent disc herniation and long-term back pain after primary lumbar discectomy: review of outcomes reported for limited versus aggressive disc removal. Neurosurgery 64 : 338-344, 2009   DOI