Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.4.229

Pullout Strength after Expandable Polymethylmethacrylate Transpedicular Screw Augmentation for Pedicle Screw Loosening  

Kang, Suk-Hyung (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Cho, Yong Jun (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine)
Kim, Young-Baeg (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
Park, Seung Won (Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.57, no.4, 2015 , pp. 229-234 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : Pedicle screw fixation for spine arthrodesis is a useful procedure for the treatment of spinal disorders. However, instrument failure often occurs, and pedicle screw loosening is the initial step of a range of complications. The authors recently used a modified transpedicular polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) screw augmentation technique to overcome pedicle screw loosening. Here, they report on the laboratory testing of pedicle screws inserted using this modified technique. Methods : To evaluate pullout strengths three cadaveric spinal columns were used. Three pedicle screw insertion methods were utilized to compare pullout strength; the three methods used were; control (C), traditional transpedicular PMMA augmentation technique (T), and the modified transpedicular augmentation technique (M). After control screws had been pulled out, loosening with instrument was made. Screw augmentations were executed and screw pullout strength was rechecked. Results : Pedicle screws augmented using the modified technique for pedicle screw loosening had higher pullout strengths than the control ($1106.2{\pm}458.0N$ vs. $741.2{\pm}269.5N$; p=0.001). Traditional transpedicular augmentation achieved a mean pullout strength similar to that of the control group ($657.5{\pm}172.3N$ vs. $724.5{\pm}234.4N$; p=0.537). The modified technique had higher strength than the traditional PMMA augmentation technique ($1070.8{\pm}358.6N$ vs. $652.2{\pm}185.5N$; p=0.023). Conclusion : The modified PMMA transpedicular screw augmentation technique is a straightforward, effective surgical procedure for treating pedicle screw loosening, and exhibits greater pullout strength than traditional PMMA transpedicular augmentation. However, long-term clinical evaluation is required.
Keywords
Biomechanics; Osteoporosis; Postoperative complication; Prosthesis loosening; Polymethylmethacrylate; Surgical technique;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bullmann V, Liljenqvist UR, Schmidt C, Schulte TL : [Posterior operative correction of idiopathic scoliosis. Value of pedicle screws versus hooks]. Orthopade 38 : 198-200, 202-204, 2009   DOI
2 Burval DJ, McLain RF, Milks R, Inceoglu S : Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae : biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 1077-1083, 2007   DOI
3 Choma TJ, Frevert WF, Carson WL, Waters NP, Pfeiffer FM : Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : 454-462, 2011   DOI
4 Denaro V, Longo UG, Maffulli N, Denaro L : Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab 6 : 125-130, 2009
5 Fu TS, Wong CB, Tsai TT, Liang YC, Chen LH, Chen WJ : Pedicle screw insertion : computed tomography versus fluoroscopic image guidance. Int Orthop 32 : 517-521, 2008   DOI
6 Jang JS, Lee SH, Kim KT, Kim BS, Lee WB : A biomechanical study on the pull-out strength of pedicle screw augmented with Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) - Cadaveric Study -. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 31 : 45-49, 2002
7 Jo JY, Kang SH, Park SW : Modified polymethylmethacrylate cervical plate and screw augmentation technique for intraoperative screw loosening. J Spinal Disord Tech 25 : 235-239, 2012   DOI
8 Kang SH, Kim KT, Park SW, Kim YB : A case of pedicle screw loosening treated by modified transpedicular screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49 : 75-78, 2011   DOI
9 Ko CC, Tsai HW, Huang WC, Wu JC, Chen YC, Shih YH, et al. : Screw loosening in the Dynesys stabilization system : radiographic evidence and effect on outcomes. Neurosurg Focus 28 : E10, 2010
10 Law M, Tencer AF, Anderson PA : Caudo-cephalad loading of pedicle screws : mechanisms of loosening and methods of augmentation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18 : 2438-2443, 1993   DOI
11 McLain RF, Fry MF, Moseley TA, Sharkey NA : Lumbar pedicle screw salvage : pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs. J Spinal Disord 8 : 62-68, 1995
12 Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K : Can insertional torque predict screw loosening and related failures? An in vivo study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 858-864, 2000   DOI
13 Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O : The dynamic neutralization system for the spine : a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11 Suppl 2 : S170-S178, 2002
14 Pitzen T, Franta F, Barbier D, Steudel WI : Insertion torque and pullout force of rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation in a fatigued initial pilot hole. J Neurosurg Spine 1 : 198-201, 2004   DOI
15 Ploeg WT, Veldhuizen AG, The B, Sietsma MS : Percutaneous vertebroplasty as a treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures : a systematic review. Eur Spine J 15 : 1749-1758, 2006   DOI
16 Shen Y, Ren H, Zhang Y, Zhi X, Ding W, Xu J, et al. : [Correlative factor analysis of complications resulting from cement leakage after percutaneous kyphoplasty in treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 24 : 27-31, 2010
17 Sun E, Alkalay R, Vader D, Snyder BD : Preventing distal pullout of posterior spine instrumentation in thoracic hyperkyphosis : a biomechanical analysis. J Spinal Disord Tech 22 : 270-277, 2009   DOI
18 Wan S, Lei W, Wu Z, Liu D, Gao M, Fu S : Biomechanical and histological evaluation of an expandable pedicle screw in osteoporotic spine in sheep. Eur Spine J 19 : 2122-2129, 2010   DOI
19 Wetzel FT, Brustein M, Phillips FM, Trott S : Hardware failure in an unconstrained lumbar pedicle screw system. A 2-year follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24 : 1138-1143, 1999   DOI
20 Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Widell EH, Thomas JC, Holland WR, Field BT, et al. : A biomechanical study of intrapeduncular screw fixation in the lumbosacral spine. Clin Orthop Relat Res (203) : 99-112, 1986
21 Wu ZX, Gao MX, Sang HX, Ma ZS, Cui G, Zhang Y, et al. : Surgical treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar compressive fractures with open vertebral cement augmentation of expandable pedicle screw fixation : a biomechanical study and a 2-year follow-up of 20 patients. J Surg Res 173 : 91-98, 2012   DOI
22 Frankel BM, Jones T, Wang C : Segmental polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw fixation in patients with bone softening caused by osteoporosis and metastatic tumor involvement : a clinical evaluation. Neurosurgery 61 : 531-537; discussion 537-538, 2007   DOI
23 Moore DC, Maitra RS, Farjo LA, Graziano GP, Goldstein SA : Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1696-1705, 1997   DOI
24 Sugimoto Y, Tanaka M, Konishi H, Takigawa T, Nakanishi K, Misawa H, et al. : Posterior spinal fusion using a pedicle nail system with polymethylmethacrylate in a paraplegic patient after vertebral collapse caused by osteoporosis. Spine J 9 : e5-e8, 2009