Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2015.57.1.36

Outcomes of Secondary Laminoplasty for Patients with Unsatisfactory Results after Anterior Multilevel Cervical Surgery  

Liu, Hong-Wei (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University)
Chen, Liang (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University)
Xu, Nan-Wei (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University)
Yang, Hui-Lin (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University)
Gu, Yong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.57, no.1, 2015 , pp. 36-41 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : To investigate the causes for failed anterior cervical surgery and the outcomes of secondary laminoplasty. Methods : Seventeen patients failed anterior multilevel cervical surgery and the following conservative treatments between Feb 2003 and May 2011 underwent secondary laminoplasty. Outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Scale and visual analogue scale (VAS) before the secondary surgery, at 1 week, 2 months, 6 months, and the final visit. Cervical alignment, causes for revision and complications were also assessed. Results : With a mean follow-up of $29.7{\pm}12.1$ months, JOA score, recovery rate and excellent to good rate improved significantly at 2 months (p< 0.05) and maintained thereafter (p>0.05). Mean VAS score decreased postoperatively (p<0.05). Lordotic angle maintained during the entire follow up (p>0.05). The causes for secondary surgery were inappropriate approach in 3 patients, insufficient decompression in 4 patients, adjacent degeneration in 2 patients, and disease progression in 8 patients. Complications included one case of C5 palsy, axial pain and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, respectively. Conclusion : Laminoplasty has satisfactory results in failed multilevel anterior surgery, with a low incidence of complications.
Keywords
Cervical spondylosis; Anterior discectomy and fusion; Anterior corpectomy and fusion; Laminoplasty;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tomita K : Laminoplasty following anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Int Orthop 18 : 1-5, 1994
2 Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, Watanabe K, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. : Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration : comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a tenyear magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 : 36-43, 2010   DOI
3 Prasarn ML, Baria D, Milne E, Latta L, Sukovich W : Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 16 : 172-177, 2012   DOI
4 Fountas KN, Kapsalaki EZ, Nikolakakos LG, Smisson HF, Johnston KW, Grigorian AA, et al. : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 2310-2317, 2007   DOI
5 Agrawal D, Sharma BS, Gupta A, Mehta VS : Efficacy and results of expansive laminoplasty in patients with severe cervical myelopathy due to cervical canal stenosis. Neurol India 52 : 54-58, 2004
6 Chen Y, Guo Y, Lu X, Chen D, Song D, Shi J, et al. : Surgical strategy for multilevel severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 24 : 24-30, 2011   DOI
7 Choi S, Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi WG, Choi WC, Choi G, et al. : Factors affecting prognosis of patients who underwent corpectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament : analysis of 47 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18 : 309-314, 2005   DOI
8 Edwards CC 2nd, Heller JG, Murakami H : Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy : an independent matched-cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 1168-1175, 2002   DOI
9 Faldini C, Pagkrati S, Leonetti D, Miscione MT, Giannini S : Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469 : 674-681, 2011   DOI
10 Hosono N, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yoshikawa H : The source of axial pain after cervical laminoplasty-C7 is more crucial than deep extensor muscles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 2985-2988, 2007   DOI
11 Hyun SJ, Rhim SC, Roh SW, Kang SH, Riew KD : The time course of range of motion loss after cervical laminoplasty : a prospective study with minimum two-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 1134-1139, 2009   DOI
12 Liu XY, Yuan SM, Tian YH, Zheng YP, Li JM : Expansive open-door laminoplasty and selective anterior cervical decompression and fusion for treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg 3 : 161-166, 2011
13 Matz PG, Holly LT, Mummaneni PV, Anderson PA, Groff MW, Heary RF, et al. : Anterior cervical surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative myelopathy. J Neurosurg Spine 11 : 170-173, 2009   DOI
14 Wang MY, Green BA : Laminoplasty for the treatment of failed anterior cervical spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus 15 : E7, 2003
15 Pang CH, Leung HB, Yen CH : Laminoplasty after anterior spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17 : 269-274, 2009   DOI
16 Petraglia AL, Srinivasan V, Coriddi M, Whitbeck MG, Maxwell JT, Silberstein HJ : Cervical laminoplasty as a management option for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy : a series of 40 patients. Neurosurgery 67 : 272-277, 2010   DOI
17 Seichi A, Hoshino Y, Kimura A, Nakahara S, Watanabe M, Kato T, et al. : Neurological complications of cervical laminoplasty for patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament-a multi-institutional retrospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : E998-E1003, 2011   DOI
18 Yagi M, Ninomiya K, Kihara M, Horiuchi Y : Long-term surgical outcome and risk factors in patients with cervical myelopathy and a change in signal intensity of intramedullary spinal cord on Magnetic Resonance imaging. J Neurosurg Spine 12 : 59-65, 2010   DOI