Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.2.98

Intraoperative Monitoring of Motor-Evoked Potentials for Supratentorial Tumor Surgery  

Lee, Jung Jae (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Kim, Young Il (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Hong, Jae Taek (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Sung, Jae Hoon (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Lee, Sang Won (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Yang, Seung Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.56, no.2, 2014 , pp. 98-102 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and clinical efficacy of motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring for supratentorial tumor surgery. Methods : Between 2010 and 2012, to prevent postoperative motor deterioration, MEP recording after transcranial stimulation was performed in 84 patients with supratentorial brain tumors (45 males, 39 females; age range, 24-80 years; median age, 58 years). MEP monitoring results were correlated with postoperative motor outcome compared to preoperative motor status. Results : MEP recordings were stable in amplitude (<50% reduction in amplitude) during surgery in 77 patients (91.7%). No postoperative motor deficit was found in 66 out of 77 patients with stable MEP amplitudes. However, postoperative paresis developed in 11 patients. False negative findings were associated with edema in peri-resectional regions and postoperative bleeding in the tumor bed. MEP decrease in amplitude (>50%) occurred in seven patients (8.3%). However, no deficit occurred postoperatively in four patients following preventive management during the operation. Three patients had permanent paresis, which could have been associated with vascular injury during tumor resection. Conclusions : MEP monitoring during supratentorial tumor surgery is feasible and safe. However, false negative MEP results associated with postoperative events may occur in some patients. To achieve successful monitoring, collaboration between surgeon, anesthesiologist and an experienced technician is mandatory.
Keywords
Brain tumor; Intraoperative monitoring; Motor-evoked potentials; Supratentorial; Surgery;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cabraja M, Stockhammer F, Mularski S, Suess O, Kombos T, Vajkoczy P : Neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring in neurosurgery : aid or handicap? An international survey. Neurosurg Focus 27 : E2, 2009
2 Fukuda M, Oishi M, Takao T, Hiraishi T, Kobayashi T, Aoki H, et al. : [Intraoperative monitoring of motor evoked potentials during glioma removal]. No Shinkei Geka 41 : 219-227, 2013
3 Gempt J, Krieg SM, Huttinger S, Buchmann N, Ryang YM, Shiban E, et al. : Postoperative ischemic changes after glioma resection identified by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and their association with intraoperative motor evoked potentials. J Neurosurg 119 : 829-836, 2013   DOI
4 Hashiguchi K, Morioka T, Yoshida F, Yoshimoto K, Shono T, Natori Y, et al. : Feasibility of intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring for skull base tumors with a high risk of postoperative motor deterioration. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 153 : 1191-1200; discussion 1200, 2011   DOI
5 Horiuchi K, Suzuki K, Sasaki T, Matsumoto M, Sakuma J, Konno Y, et al. : Intraoperative monitoring of blood flow insufficiency during surgery of middle cerebral artery aneurysms. J Neurosurg 103 : 275-283, 2005   DOI
6 Iwasaki M, Kuroda S, Niiya Y, Ishikawa T, Iwasaki Y : Sensitivity of motor evoked potential (MEP) to intraoperative cerebral ischemia : case report. Jpn J Neurosurg (Tokyo) 17 : 622-626, 2008   DOI
7 Kang D, Yao P, Wu Z, Yu L : Ischemia changes and tolerance ratio of evoked potential monitoring in intracranial aneurysm surgery. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115 : 552-556, 2013   DOI
8 Kombos T, Kopetsch O, Suess O, Brock M : Does preoperative paresis influence intraoperative monitoring of the motor cortex? J Clin Neurophysiol 20 : 129-134, 2003   DOI
9 Kombos T, Suess O, Ciklatekerlio O, Brock M : Monitoring of intraoperative motor evoked potentials to increase the safety of surgery in and around the motor cortex. J Neurosurg 95 : 608-614, 2001   DOI
10 Kong DS, Park K : Hemifacial spasm : a neurosurgical perspective. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42 : 355-362, 2007   DOI
11 Langeloo DD, Lelivelt A, Louis Journee H, Slappendel R, de Kleuver M : Transcranial electrical motor-evoked potential monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity : a study of 145 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 1043-1050, 2003
12 MacDonald DB : Safety of intraoperative transcranial electrical stimulation motor evoked potential monitoring. J Clin Neurophysiol 19 : 416-429, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Cedzich C, Schramm J : Motor evoked potential monitoring with supratentorial surgery. Neurosurgery 54 : 1061-1070; discussion 1070-1072, 2004   DOI
14 Neuloh G, Pechstein U, Schramm J : Motor tract monitoring during insular glioma surgery. J Neurosurg 106 : 582-592, 2007   DOI
15 Quinones-Hinojosa A, Lyon R, Zada G, Lamborn KR, Gupta N, Parsa AT, et al. : Changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials during intramedullary spinal cord tumor resection correlate with postoperative motor function. Neurosurgery 56 : 982-993; discussion 982-993, 2005
16 Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R : Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 81 : 1005-1043, 1994   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Son BC, Lee SW, Kim S, Hong JT, Sung JH, Yang SH : Transzygomatic approach with intraoperative neuromonitoring for resection of middle cranial fossa tumors. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 73 : 28-35, 2012   DOI
18 Tanaka S, Tashiro T, Gomi A, Takanashi J, Ujiie H : Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations. Surg Neurol Int 2 : 111, 2011   DOI
19 Wiedemayer H, Fauser B, Sandalcioglu IE, Schafer H, Stolke D : The impact of neurophysiological intraoperative monitoring on surgical decisions : a critical analysis of 423 cases. J Neurosurg 96 : 255-262, 2002   DOI