Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.56.2.130

A Groove Technique for Securing an Electrode Connector on the Cranial Bone : Case Analysis of Efficacy  

Lee, Sung-Woo (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Lee, Myung-Ki (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Seo, Il (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Kim, Ho-Sang (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Kim, Jeong-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Kim, Yun-Suk (Department of Neurosurgery, Maryknoll Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.56, no.2, 2014 , pp. 130-134 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : A groove technique for securing an electrode connector was described as an alternative surgical technique in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery to avoid electrode connector-related complications, such as skin erosion, infection, and migration. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed 109 patients undergoing one of two techniques; the standard technique (52 patients using 104 electrodes) and the groove technique (57 patients using 109 electrodes) for securing the electrode connector in DBS surgery, regardless of patient disease. In the standard percutaneous tunneling technique, the connector was placed on the vertex of the cranial surface. The other technique, so called the groove technique, created a groove (about 4 cm long, 8 mm wide) in the cranial bone at the posterior parietal area. Wound erosion and migration related to the connectors were compared between the two techniques. Results : The mean follow-up period was 73 months for the standard method and 46 months for the groove technique. Connector-related complications were observed in three patients with the groove technique and in seven patients with the standard technique. Wound erosion at the connector sites per electrode was one (0.9%) with the groove technique and six (5.8%) with the standard technique. This difference was statistically significant. The electrode connector was migrated in two patients with the groove technique and in one patient with the standard technique. Conclusions : The groove technique, which involves securing an electrode using a groove in the cranial bone at the posterior parietal area, offers an effective and safe method to avoid electrode connector-related complications during DBS surgery.
Keywords
Deep brain stimulation; Connector; Complications;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Rezai AR, Machado AG, Deogaonkar M, Azmi H, Kubu C, Boulis NM : Surgery for movement disorders. Neurosurgery 62 Suppl 2 : 809-838; discussion 838-839, 2008   DOI
2 Sierens D, Kutz S, Philitsis JG, Bakay RA : Stereotactic surgery with microelectrode recordings in Bakay RA (ed) : Movement disorder surgery. New York : Thieme, 2009, pp214-216
3 Sillay KA, Larson PS, Starr PA : Deep brain stimulator hardware-related infections : incidence and management in a large series. Neurosurgery 62 : 360-366; discussion 366-367, 2008   DOI
4 Voges J, Waerzeggers Y, Maarouf M, Lehrke R, Koulousakis A, Lenartz D, et al. : Deep-brain stimulation : long-term analysis of complications caused by hardware and surgery--experiences from a single centre. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77 : 868-872, 2006   DOI
5 Alim LB, John M, Stephan C, Eric S, Napoleon T, Brigitte P, et al. : Subthalamic deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease in Youmans JR (ed) : Neurological Surgery, ed 6. Elsevier : Saunders, 2011, Vol 1, pp944-962
6 Bhatia R, Dalton A, Richards M, Hopkins C, Aziz T, Nandi D : The incidence of deep brain stimulator hardware infection : the effect of change in antibiotic prophylaxis regimen and review of the literature. Br J Neurosurg 25 : 625-631, 2011   DOI
7 Kim EU, Kim JM, Yoo CJ, Lee U : The procedure of cables insertion in deep brain stimulation surgery. J Korean Soc Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 7 : 37-40, 2011
8 Chou YC, Lin SZ, Hsieh WA, Lin SH, Lee CC, Hsin YL, et al. : Surgical and hardware complications in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. J Clin Neurosci 14 : 643-649, 2007   DOI
9 Hariz MI : Complications of deep brain stimulation surgery. Mov Disord 17 Suppl 3 : S162-S166, 2002   DOI
10 Hu X, Jiang X, Zhou X, Liang J, Wang L, Cao Y, et al. : Avoidance and management of surgical and hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 88 : 296-303, 2010   DOI
11 Louis AW, Kim JB : Deep brain stimulation in movement disorders : Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and dystonia in Schmidek HH (ed) : Operative neurosurgical techniques, ed 6. Elsevier : Saunders, 2012, Vol 2, pp1309-1320
12 Oh MY, Abosch A, Kim SH, Lang AE, Lozano AM : Long-term hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 50 : 1268-1274; discussion 1274-1276, 2002
13 Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Wilkinson SB, Simpson RK Jr, Ondo WG, Tarsy D, et al. : Long-term evaluation of deep brain stimulation of the thalamus. J Neurosurg 104 : 506-512, 2006   DOI
14 Park YS, Kang JH, Kim HY, Kang DW, Chang WS, Kim JP, et al. : A combination procedure with double C-shaped skin incision and dual-floor burr hole method to prevent skin erosion on the scalp and reduce postoperative skin complications in deep brain stimulation. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 89 : 178-184, 2011   DOI
15 Pena E, Pastor J, Hernando V, Gallego I, Pedrosa M, Carrasco R, et al. : Skin erosion over implants in deep brain stimulation patients. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 86 : 120-126, 2008   DOI
16 Rezai AR, Kopell BH, Gross RE, Vitek JL, Sharan AD, Limousin P, et al. : Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease : surgical issues. Mov Disord 21 Suppl 14 : S197-S218, 2006   DOI