Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.51.6.343

NFlex Dynamic Stabilization System : Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of Multi-Center Study  

Coe, Jeffrey D. (Silicon Valley Spine Institute)
Kitchel, Scott H. (Orthopedic Spine Associates)
Meisel, Hans Jorg (BG-Clinic Bergmannstrost)
Wingo, Charles H. (Tallahassee Orthopedic Clinic)
Lee, Soo-Eon (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Jahng, Tae-Ahn (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.51, no.6, 2012 , pp. 343-349 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : Pedicle-based dynamic stabilization systems, in which semi-rigid rods or cords are used to restrict or control spinal segmental motion, aim to reduce or eliminate the drawbacks associated with rigid fusion. In this study, we analyzed the two-year clinical outcomes of patients treated with the NFlex (Synthes Spine, Inc.), a pedicle-based dynamic stabilization system. Methods : Five sites participated in a retrospective study of 72 consecutive patients who underwent NFlex stabilization. Of these 72 patients, 65 were available for 2-year follow-up. Patients were included based on the presence of degenerative disc disease (29 patients), degenerative spondylolisthesis (16 patients), lumbar stenosis (9 patients), adjacent segment degeneration (6 patients), and degenerative lumbar scoliosis (5 patients). The clinical outcome measures at each assessment were Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to measure back pain, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) to measure functional status. Radiographic assessments included evidence of instrumentation failure or screw loosening. Results : Sixty-five patients (26 men and 39 women) with a mean age of 54.5 years were included. Mean follow-up was 25.6 months. The mean VAS score improved from 8.1 preoperatively to 3.8 postoperatively, representing a 53% improvement, and the ODI score from 44.5 to 21.8, representing a 51% improvement. Improvements in pain and disability scores were statistically significant. Three implant-related complications were observed. Conclusion : Posterior pedicle-based dynamic stabilization using the NFlex system seems effective in improving pain and functional scores, with sustained clinical improvement after two years. With appropriate patient selection, it may be considered an effective alternative to rigid fusion.
Keywords
Lumbar spine; Posterior dynamic stabilization; Spinal fusion; Non-fusion stabilization;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Highsmith JM, Tumialán LM, Rodts GE Jr : Flexible rods and the case for dynamic stabilization. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E11, 2007
2 Hilibrand AS, Robbins M : Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease : the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4 : 190S-194S, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Khoueir P, Kim KA, Wang MY : Classification of posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E3, 2007
4 Lee SE, Park SB, Jahng TA, Chung CK, Kim HJ : Clinical experience of the dynamic stabilization system for the degenerative spine disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 43 : 221-226, 2008   DOI
5 Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, Tohtz SW, Perka C : The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse : nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dynamic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : E109-E114, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Tozzi JE, Weinstein JN, Reinarz SJ, el-Khoury GY, et al. : Long-term follow-up of lower lumbar fusion patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12 : 97-104, 1987   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Markwalder TM, Wenger M : Adjacent-segment morbidity. J Neurosurg 96 : 139-140, 2002
8 Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK : Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilization. Eur Spine J 11 : S198-S205, 2002
9 Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, et al. : Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 5 : correlation between radiographic and functional outcome. J Neurosurg Spine 2 : 658-661, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Reyes-Sanchez A, Zarate-Kalfopulos B, Ramirez-Mora I, Rosales-Olivarez LM, Alpizar-Aguirre A, Sanchez-Bringas G : Posterior dynamic stabilization of the lumbar spine with the Accuflex rod system as a stand-alone device : experience in 20 patients with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 19 : 2164-2170, 2010   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B : Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 442-449, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schwarzenbach O, Berlemann U, Stoll TM, Dubois G : Posterior dynamic stabilization systems : DYNESYS. Orthop Clin North Am 36 : 363-372, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Wallach CJ, Teng AL, Wang JC. NFlex in Yue JJ, Bertagnoli R, McAfee PC, An HS (eds) : Motion preservation surgery of the spine. Philadelphia : Saunders, 2008, pp505-510
14 Sengupta DK, Mulholland RC : Fulcrum assisted soft stabilization system : a new concept in the surgical treatment of degenerative low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1019-1029; discussion 1030, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Stoffel M, Behr M, Reinke A, Stüer C, Ringel F, Meyer B : Pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization of the thoracolumbar spine with the Cosmic-system : a prospective observation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 152 : 835-843, 2010   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O : The dynamic neutralization system for the spine : a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11 : S170-S178, 2002
17 Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE, Davis R, Maxwell JH, Delamarter R, et al. : Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralization system : 1-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E8, 2007
18 Acosta FL, Christensen FB, Coe JD, Jahng TA, Kitchel SH, Meiser HJ, et al. : Early clinical and radiograhic results of NFix II posterior dynamic stabilization system. SAS Journal 2 : 69-75, 2008   DOI
19 Bastian L, Lange U, Knop C, Tusch G, Blauth M : Evaluation of the mobility of adjacent segments after posterior thoracolumbar fixation: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 10 : 295-300, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR : Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 22 : 376-383, 2009   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Boos N, Webb JK : Pedicle screw fixation in spinal disorders : a European view. Eur Spine J 6 : 2-18, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A : Chronic low back pain and fusion : a comparison of three surgical techniques : a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 1131-1141, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Chou WY, Hsu CJ, Chang WN, Wong CY : Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar spinal posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in elderly patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122 : 39-43, 2002   DOI
24 Crawford NR, Reyes PM, Senoglu M, Yim J : Motion Characteristics of the NFlex Pedicle Screw Based Dynamic Stabilization System : A Human Cadaver. Spine Arthroplasty Society Annual Meeting, Miami USA, 2008
25 Etebar S, Cahill DW : Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability. J Neurosurg 90 : 163-169, 1999
26 Fritzell P, Hagg O, Nordwall A : Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain : comparison of three surgical techniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12 : 178-189, 2003
27 Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Anasetti F, Ciavarro C, Lovi A, Brayda-Bruno M : Rigid and flexible spinal stabilization devices : a biomechanical comparison. Med Eng Phys 33 : 490-496, 2011   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF : Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine : surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 324-331, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Guigui P, Wodecki P, Bizot P, Lambert P, Chaumeil G, Deburge A : [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis : a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 86 : 546-557, 2000