Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2012.51.2.81

The Effect of Body Mass Index on Intra-Abdominal Pressure and Blood Loss in Lumbar Spine Surgery  

Han, In-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Son, Dong-Wuk (Department of Neurosurgery, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital)
Nam, Kyoung-Hyup (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Choi, Byung-Kwan (Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital)
Song, Geun-Sung (Department of Neurosurgery, Yangsan Pusan National University Hospital)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.51, no.2, 2012 , pp. 81-85 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the effects of body mass index (BMI) on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intraoperative blood loss (IBL) during lumbar spinal surgery. Methods : Thirty patients scheduled for single level posterior lumbar interbody fusion were allocated equally to a normal group (Group 1, BMI;$18.5-22.9kg/m^2$), an overweight group (Group 2, BMI; $23-24.9kg/m^2$), and an obese group (Group 3, BMI; $25.0-29.9kg/m^2$) according to BMI. IAP was measured using a urinary bladder catheter; 1) supine after anesthesia induction, 2) prone at skin incision, 3) prone at the end of surgery. In addition, IBL was also measured in the three groups. Results : IAP in the supine position was not significantly different in groups 1, 2, and 3 (2.7 mm Hg, 3.0 mm Hg, and 4.2 mm Hg, respectively) ($p$=0.258), and IAP in the prone position at incision increased to 7.8 mm Hg, 8.2 mm Hg, and 10.4 mm Hg, respectively, in the three groups, and these intergroup differences were significant, especially for Group 3 ($p$=0.000). IAP at the end of surgery was slightly lower (7.0 mm Hg, 7.7 mm Hg, and 9.2 mm Hg, respectively). IBLs were not significantly different between the three groups. However, IBLs were found to increase with IAP in the prone position ($p$=0.022) and BMI ($p$<0.05). Conclusion : These results show that BMI affects IAP in the prone position more than in the supine position during lumbar spinal surgery. In addition, IBLs were found to increase with IAP in the prone position and with BMI. Thus, IBLs can be expected to be higher in morbidly obese patients due to an increased IAP.
Keywords
Body mass index; Intra-abdominal pressure; Urinary bladder pressure; Intraoperative blood loss; Posterior lumbar interbody fusion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Batson OV : The function of the vertebral veins and their role in the spread of metastases. 1940. Clin Orthop Relat Res : 4-9, 1995
2 BOstman O, Hyrkas J, Hirvensalo E, Kallio E : Blood loss, operating time, and positioning of the patient in lumbar disc surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15 : 360-363, 1990   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Cobb WS, Burns JM, Kercher KW, Matthews BD, James Norton H, Todd Heniford B : Normal intraabdominal pressure in healthy adults. J Surg Res 129 : 231-235, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Fusco MA, Martin RS, Chang MC : Estimation of intra-abdominal pressure by bladder pressure measurement : validity and methodology. J Trauma 50 : 297-302, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Imagama S, Kawakami N, Tsuji T, Ohara T, Matsubara Y, Kanemura T, et al. : Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery : evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center. J Orthop Sci 16 : 510-515, 2011   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Karikari IO, Isaacs RE : Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion : a review of techniques and outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35 : S294-S301, 2010   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Kou J, Fischgrund J, Biddinger A, Herkowitz H : Risk factors for spinal epidural hematoma after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27 : 1670-1673, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kron IL, Harman PK, Nolan SP : The measurement of intra-abdominal pressure as a criterion for abdominal re-exploration. Ann Surg 199 : 28-30, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lin PM : A technical modification of Cloward's posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery 1 : 118-124, 1977   DOI
10 Park CK : The effect of patient positioning on intraabdominal pressure and blood loss in spinal surgery. Anesth Analg 91 : 552-557, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Rigamonti A, Gemma M, Rocca A, Messina M, Bignami E, Beretta L : Prone versus knee-chest position for microdiscectomy : a prospective randomized study of intra-abdominal pressure and intraoperative bleeding. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1918-1923, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sanchez NC, Tenofsky PL, Dort JM, Shen LY, Helmer SD, Smith RS : What is normal intra-abdominal pressure? Am Surg 67 : 243-248, 2001
13 Sundén G, Wallöe A, Wingstrand H : A new device to reduce intra-abdominal pressure during lumbar surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11 : 635-636, 1986   DOI   ScienceOn
14 WHO/IASO/IOTF : The Asia-Pacific perspective : redefining obesity and its treatment. Health Communications Australia : Melbourne ISBN 0-9577082-1, 2000
15 Aono H, Ohwada T, Hosono N, Tobimatsu H, Ariga K, Fuji T, et al. : Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 15 : 202-205, 2011   DOI   ScienceOn