Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.48.3.225

Minimally Invasive Muscle Sparing Transmuscular Microdiscectomy : Technique and Comparison with Conventional Subperiosteal Microdiscectomy during the Early Postoperative Period  

Park, Beom-Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kwon, Young-Joon (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Won, Yu-Sam (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Shin, Hyun-Chul (Department of Neurosurgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.48, no.3, 2010 , pp. 225-229 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : The authors introduce a minimally invasive muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy (MSTM) to treat herniated lumbar disc disease. Its results are compared with conventional subperiosteal microdiscectomy (CSM) to validate the effectiveness. Methods : Muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy, which involves muscle dissection approach using the natural fat cleavage plane between the multifidus to expose the interlaminar space, was performed in 23 patients to treat a single level unilateral lumbar radiculopathy. The creatine phosphokinase (CPK)-MM serum levels were measured on admission and at 1, 3, and 5 days postoperatively. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) and recorded on admission and at 1, 3, and 5 days postoperatively. The results were compared to those from the conventional subperiosteal microdiscectomy (43 patients). Results : The CPK-MM levels were significantly lower in the serum of the MSTM group compared to the CSM group on postoperative days three and five (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). The clinical scales for back pain using VAS were significantly lower in the MSTM group than in the CSM group on postoperative days three (p = 0.04). The mean VAS scores for leg pain in both groups showed no significant differences during the early postoperative period. Conclusion : Muscle sparing transmuscular microdiscectomy is a minimally invasive surgical option to treat lumbar radiculopathy due to herniated disc. The approach affected minimal injury to posterior lumbar supporting structures with alleviated postoperative back pain.
Keywords
Lumbar spine; Muscle sparing technique; Microdiscectomy; Minimally invasive surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sasaoka R, Nakamura H, Konishi S, Nagayama R, Suzuki E, Terai H, et al. : Objective assessment of reduced invasiveness in MED. Compared with conventional one-level laminotomy. Eur Spine J 15 : 577-582, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Anand N, Baron EM, Bray Jr RS : Modified muscle-sparing paraspinal approach for stabilization and interlaminar decompression : a minimally invasive technique for pedicle screw-based posterior nonfusion stabilization. SAS Journal 2 : 40-42, 2008   DOI
3 Riesenburger RI, David CA : Lumbar microdiscectomy and microendoscopic discectomy. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 15 : 267-270, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Taylor RS : Spinal cord stimulation in complex regional pain syndrome and refractory neuropathic back and leg pain/failed back surgery syndrome : results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 31 : S13-S19, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Schick U, Dohnert J, Richter A, König A, Vitzthum HE : Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy versus open surgery : an intraoperative EMG study. Eur Spine J 11 : 20-26, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Shin DA, Kim KN, Shin HC, Yoon DH : The efficacy of microendoscopic discectomy in reducing iatrogenic muscle injury. J Neurosurg Spine 8 : 39-43, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A : Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 18 : 575-581, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, Nelson WE : The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 50 : 919-926, 1968
9 Dixon SH Jr, Fuchs JC, Ebert PA : Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase activity following thoracic, cardiac, and abdominal operations. Arch Surg 103 : 66-68, 1971
10 Foley KT, Smith MM : Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 3 : 301-307, 1997
11 Kim YB, Hyun SJ : Clinical applications of the tubular retractor on spinal disorders. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 42 : 245-250, 2007   과학기술학회마을   DOI
12 Katayama Y, Matsuyama Y, Yoshihara H, Sakai Y, Nakamura H, Nakashima S, et al. : Comparison of surgical outcomes between macro discectomy and micro discectomy for lumbar disc herniation : a prospective randomized study with surgery performed by the same spine surgeon. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 : 344-347, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H : Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1018-1023, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Matsui H, et al. : Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 2683-2688, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Koebbe CJ, Maroon JC, Abla A, El-Kadi H, Bost J : Lumbar microdiscectomy : a historical perspective and current technical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 13 : E3, 2002
16 Kotil K, Tunckale T, Tatar Z, Koldas M, Kural A, Bilge T : Serum creatine phosphokinase activity and histological changes in the multifidus muscle : a prospective randomized controlled comparative study of discectomy with or without retraction. J Neurosurg Spine 6 : 121-125, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Arts MP, Nieborg A, Brand R, Peul WC : Serum creatine phosphokinase as an indicator of muscle injury after various spinal and nonspinal surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Spine 7 : 282-286, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Brock M, Kunkel P, Papavero L : Lumbar microdiscectomy : subperiosteal versus transmuscular approach and influence on the early postoperative analgesic consumption. Eur Spine J 17 : 518-522, 2008   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Caspar W : A new surgical procedure for lumbar disc herniation causing less tissue damage through a microsurgical approach. Adv Neurosurg 4 : 152, 1977
20 Choi YY, Yoon SH, Ha Y, Kim EY, Park HC, Park CO : Posterior microscopic lesionectomy for lumbar disc herniation with tubular retraction using METRxTM system. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 40 : 406-411, 2006   과학기술학회마을
21 Anand N, Baron EM, Bray Jr RS : Benefits of the paraspinal musclesparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization : comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes. SAS Journal 1 : 93-99, 2007   DOI