1 |
Gunzburg R, Szpalski M, Callary SA, Colloca CJ, Kosmopoulos V, Harrison D, et al. : Effect of a novel interspinous implant on lumbar spinal range of motion. Eur Spine J 18 : 696-703, 2009
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, McInnes JM, Fossel AH, Liang MH : The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 : 809-816, 1991
DOI
|
3 |
Kim KA, McDonald M, Pik JH, Khoueir P, Wang MY : Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization : case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation. Neurosurgical Focus 22 : E7, 2007
|
4 |
Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Howard J : Fusion and nonsurgical treatment for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disease : a systematic review of Oswestry Disability Index and MOS Short Form-36 outcomes. Spine J 8 : 747-755, 2008
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Caserta S, La Maida GA, Misaggi B, Peroni D, Pietrabissa R, Raimondi MT, et al. : Elastic stabilization alone or combined with rigid fusion in spinal surgery : a biomechanical study and clinical experience based on 82 cases. Eur Spine J 11 : S192-S197, 2002
|
6 |
Christie SD, Song JK, Fessler RG : Dynamic interspinous process technology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : S73-S78, 2005
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Costa F, Sassi M, Cardia A, Ortolina A, De Santis A, Luccarell G, et al. : Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis : analysis of results in a series of 374 patients treated with unilateral laminotomy for bilateral microdecompression. J Neurosurg Spine 7 : 579-586, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Gunzburg R, Szpalski M : The conservative surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Eur Spine J 12 : S176-S180, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Hopp E, Tsou PM : Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 227 : 143-151, 1988
|
10 |
Bono CM, Vaccaro AR : Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 20 : 255-261, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Xu WX, Wang J, Lu D, Wu Z, Zhu WM, Zhang C : [Surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis by different methods.] Zhongguo Gu Shang 22 : 738-740, 2009
|
12 |
Taylor J, Pupin P, Delajoux S, Palmer S : Device for intervertebral assisted motion : technique and initial results. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E6, 2007
|
13 |
Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson AN, Blood E, Hanscom B, et al. : Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358 : 794-810, 2008
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Wiseman CM, Lindsey DP, Fredrick AD, Yerby SA : The effect of an interspinous process implant on facet loading during extension. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 903-907, 2005
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Yong-Hing K, Kirkaldy-Willis WH : The pathophysiology of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Orthop Clin North Am 14 : 491-504, 1983
|
16 |
Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S, Zafiropoulos A : Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 18 : 830-840, 2009
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Minns RJ, Walsh WK : Preliminary design and experimental studies of a novel soft implant for correcting sagittal plane instability in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22 : 1819-1825; discussion 1826-1827, 1997
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Palmer S, Mahar A, Oka R : Biomechanical and radiographic analysis of a novel, minimally invasive, extension-limiting device for the lumbar spine. Neurosurg Focus 22 : E4, 2007
|
19 |
Sobottke R, Schlüter-Brust K, Kaulhausen T, Röllinghoff M, Joswig B, Stützer H, et al. : Interspinous implants (X Stop, Wallis, Diam) for the treatment of LSS : is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? Eur Spine J 18 : 1494-1503, 2009
DOI
|
20 |
Swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA : The effects of an interspinous implant on intervertebral disc pressures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 26-32, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Kosaka H, Sairyo K, Biyani A, Leaman D, Yeasting R, Higashino K, et al. : Pathomechanism of loss of elasticity and hypertrophy of lumbar ligamentum flavum in elderly patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 2805-2811, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Lindsey DP, Swanson KE, Fuchs P, Hsu KY, Zucherman JF, Yerby SA : The effects of an interspinous implant on the kinematics of the instrumented and adjacent levels in the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 2192-2197, 2003
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Kalbarczyk A, Lukes A, Seiler RW : Surgical treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140 : 637-641, 1998
DOI
ScienceOn
|
24 |
Malmivaara A, Slätis P, Heliövaara M, Sainio P, Kinnunen H, Kankare J, et al. : Surgical or nonoperative treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32 : 1-8, 2007
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Mariottini A, Pieri S, Giachi S, Carangelo B, Zalaffi A, Muzii FV, et al. : Preliminary results of a soft novel lumbar intervertebral prothesis (DIAM) in the degenerative spinal pathology. Acta Neurochir Suppl 92 : 129-131, 2005
|
26 |
Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K : Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11 : 107-110, 1986
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH : Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 : 92-98, 1996
DOI
ScienceOn
|