Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2009.45.4.213

Load Sharing Mechanism Across Graft-Bone Interface in Static Cervical Locking Plate Fixation  

Han, In-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Kuh, Sung-Uk (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Chin, Dong-Kyu (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Jin, Byung-Ho (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Cho, Yang-Eun (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Kim, Keun-Su (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.45, no.4, 2009 , pp. 213-218 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : This study is a retrospective clinical study over more than 4 years of follow up to understand the mechanism of load sharing across the graft-bone interface in the static locking plate (SLP) fixation compared with non-locking plate (NLP). Methods : Orion locking plates and Top non-locking plates were used for SLP fixation in 29 patients and NLP fixation in 24 patients, respectively. Successful interbody fusion was estimated by dynamic X-ray films. The checking parameters were as follows : screw angle (SA) between upper and lower screw, anterior and posterior height of fusion segment between upper and lower endplate (AH & PH), and upper and lower distance from vertebral endplate to the end of plate (UD & LD). Each follow-up value of AH and PH were compared to initial values. Contributions of upper and lower collapse to whole segment collapse were estimated. Results : Successful intervertebral bone fusion rate was 100% in the SLP group and 92% in the NLP group. The follow-up mean value of SA in SLP group was not significantly changed compared with initial value, but follow-up mean value of SA in NLP group decreased more than those in SLP group (p=0.0067). Statistical analysis did not show a significant difference in the change in AH and PH between SLP and NLP groups (p>0.05). Follow-up AH of NLP group showed more collapse than PH of same group (p=0.04). The upper portion of the vertebral body collapsed more than the lower portion in the SLP fixation (p=0.00058). Conclusion : The fused segments with SLP had successful bone fusion without change in initial screw angle, which was not observed in NLP fixation. It suggests that there was enough load sharing across bone-graft interface in SLP fixation.
Keywords
Cervical vertebrae; Spinal fusion; Surgical Fixation Devices;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 0  (Related Records In Web of Science)
Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Epstein NE : The management of one-level anterior cervical corpectomy with fusion using Atlantis hybrid plates: preliminary experience. J Spinal Disord 13 : 324-328, 2000   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
2 Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Imanaka T, Miyamoto K, Kanemoto M : Anterior cervical plate used in degenerative disease can maintain cervical lordosis. J Spinal Disord 9 : 470-476, 1996   PUBMED   ScienceOn
3 Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K : Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 10 : 320-324, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lim TH, Kwon H, Jeon CH, Kim JG, Sokolowski M, Natarajan R, et al : Effect of endplate conditions and bone mineral density on the compressive strength of the graft-endplate interface in anterior cervical spine fusion. Spine 26 : 951-956, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Reidy D, Finkelstein J, Nagpurkar A, Mousavi P, Whyne C : Cervical spine loading characteristics in a cadaveric C5 corpectomy model using a static and dynamic plate. J Spinal Disord Tech 17 : 117-122, 2004   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 van Limbeek J, Jacobs WC, Anderson PG, Pavlov PW : A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion. Eur Spine J 9 : 129-136, 2000   DOI
7 Brodke DS, Gollogly S, Alexander Mohr R, Nguyen BK, Dailey AT, Bachus aK : Dynamic cervical plates: biomechanical evaluation of load sharing and stiffness. Spine 26 : 1324-1329, 2001   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Park DH, Ramakrishnan P, Cho TH, Lorenz E, Eck JC, Humphreys SC, et al : Effect of lower two-level anterior cervical fusion on the superior adjacent level. J Neurosurg Spine 7 : 336-340, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Brodke DS, Klimo P Jr, Bachus KN, Braun JT, Dailey AT : Anterior cervical fixation : analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88 : 1566-1573, 2006   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Caspar W, Geisler FH, Pitzen T, Johnson TA : Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease : overtreatment or $benefit^{?}$ J Spinal Disord 11 : 1-11, 1998   PUBMED   ScienceOn
11 Paramore CG, Dickman CA, Sonntag VK : Radiographic and clinical follow-up review of Caspar plates in 49 patients. J Neurosurg 84 : 957-961, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Smith SA, Lindsey RW, Doherty BJ, Alexander J, Dickson JH : An in-vitro biomechanical comparison of the Orosco and AO locking plates for anterior cervical spine fixation. J Spinal Disord 8 : 220-223, 1995   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Heidecke V, Rainov NG, Burkert W : Anterior cervical fusion with the Orion locking plate system. Spine 23 : 1796-1802; discussion 1803, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Lowery GL, McDonough RF : The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation. Patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up. Spine 23 : 181-186; discussion 186-187, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, Jeong ST, Kim JG, Hodges SD, et al : Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine 27 : 2431-2434, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
16 DuBois CM, Bolt PM, Todd AG, Gupta P, Wetzel FT, Phillips FM : Static versus dynamic plating for multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine J 7 : 188-193, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
17 McLaughlin MR, Purighalla V, Pizzi FJ : Cost advantages of two-level anterior cervical fusion with rigid internal fixation for radiculopathy and degenerative disease. Surg Neurol 48 : 560-565, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Saphier PS, Arginteanu MS, Moore FM, Steinberger AA, Camins MB : Stress-shielding compared with load-sharing anterior cervical plate fixation : a clinical and radiographic prospective analysis of 50 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 6 : 391 397, 2007   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
19 Chung DY, Cho DC, Lee SH, Sung JK : Preliminary surgical result of cervical spine reconstruction with a dynamic plate and titanium cage. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 41 : 111-117, 2007
20 Ipsen BJ, Kim DH, Jenis LG, Tromanhauser SG, Banco RJ : Effect of plate position on clinical outcome after anterior cervical spine surgery. Spine J 7 : 637-642, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Phillips FM, Carlson G, Emery SE, Bohlman HH : Anterior cervical pseudarthrosis. Natural history and treatment. Spine 22 : 1585-1589, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Grubb MR, Currier BL, Shih JS, Bonin V, Grabowski JJ, Chao EY : Biomechanical evaluation of anterior cervical spine stabilization. Spine 23 : 886-892, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow K, Kanim LE, Delamarter RB : The effect of cervical plating on single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord 12 : 467-471, 1999   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Cauthen JC, Kinard RE, Vogler JB, Jackson DE, DePaz OB, Hunter OL, et al : Outcome analysis of noninstrumented anterior cervical discectomy and interbody fusion in 348 patients. Spine 23 : 188-192, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Herrmann AM, Geisler FH : Geometric results of anterior cervical plate stabilization in degenerative disease. Spine 29 : 1226-1234, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Geisler FH, Caspar W, Pitzen T, Johnson TA : Reoperation in patients after anterior cervical plate stabilization in degenerative disease. Spine 23 : 911-920, 1998   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Mobbs RJ, Rao P, Chandran NK : Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: analysis of surgical outcome with and without plating. J Clin Neurosci 14 : 639-642, 2007   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Spivak JM, Chen D, Kummer FJ : The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating. Spine 24 : 334-338, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Balabhadra RS, Kim DH, Zhang HY : Anterior cervical fusion using dense cancellous allografts and dynamic plating. Neurosurgery 54 : 1405-1411; discussion 1411-1402, 2004   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
30 Emery SE, Fisher JR, Bohlman HH : Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion : radiographic and clinical results. Spine 22 : 2622-2624; discussion 2625, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Kim KS : Long-term effects on the cervical spine after anterior locking plate fixation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 30 : 493-500, 2001
32 Bolesta MJ, Rechtine GR 2nd, Chrin AM : One- and two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: the effect of plate fixation. Spine J 2 : 197-203, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Kaiser MG, Haid RW Jr, Subach BR, Barnes B, Rodts GE Jr : Anterior cervical plating enhances arthrodesis after discectomy and fusion with cortical allograft. Neurosurgery 50 : 229-236; discussion 236-238, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn