Browse > Article

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Spinal Decompression : A Comparative Study Between Bilateral Laminotomy and Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression  

Kim, Seok-Won (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine Chosun University)
Ju, Chang-Il (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine Chosun University)
Kim, Chong-Gue (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine Chosun University)
Lee, Seung-Myung (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine Chosun University)
Shin, Ho (Department of Neurosurgery College of Medicine Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.42, no.3, 2007 , pp. 195-199 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : Bilateral laminotomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression are becoming the minimally invasive procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). With the aim of less invasiveness and better preservation of spinal stability. these techniques have been developed. But there are no large randomized studies to show the surgical results between these two techniques. The objective of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of these two minimally invasive techniques. Methods : A total of 80 patients were included in this study (Group I : bilateral laminotomy, Group II : Unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression). Perioperative parameters and complications were analyzed. Symptoms and scores such as visual analog scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and SF-36 scores of prospectively accrued patients were assessed preoperatively and at 1 month and 12 months after surgery. Paired-t test, two-sample student-t tests, and non parametric tests were used to determine cross-sectional differences between two groups. Results : No major complications such as spinal instability or deaths occurred during follow-up periods. VAS, ODI scores and SF-36 body pain and physical function scores showed statistically significant improvements in both groups (p<0.001). The significant widening of the spinal canal diameter was also noted in both groups. But, in Group II. there were minor postoperative complications such as dural tear (2 cases 5.0%), fracture of ipsilateral inferior facet (1 case 2.5%), and 5 cases of transient leg symptoms of contralateral side. Conclusion : Both bilateral laminotomy and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression allow achievement of adequate and long-lasting operative results in patients with LSS. But postoperative complications are more frequent in Group II (unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression). These results indicate that bilateral laminotomy is the preferred minimally invasive technique to treat symptomatic LSS.
Keywords
Lumbar stenosis; Laminotomy; Results; Minimally invasive surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
Times Cited By Web Of Science : 1  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljarvi L, Airaksinen O, Partanen J, Tapaninaho A : Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 18 : 575-581, 1993   DOI
2 Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD : The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30 : 473-483, 1992   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Fox MW, Onofrio BM, Onofrio BM, Hanssen AD : Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis : a comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. J Neurosurg 85 : 793-802, 1996   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Katz JN : Lumbar spinal fusion. Surgical rates, costs, and complications. Spine (Suppl 24) 20 : 78S-83S, 1995   DOI
5 Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG, McInnes JM, Fossel AH, Liang MH : The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73 : 809-816, 1991   DOI   PUBMED
6 Lee Dy, Lee SH, Jang JS : Acute spinal epidural hematoma following unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 40 : 35-37, 2006   과학기술학회마을
7 Johnsson KE, Redlund-Johnell I, Uden A, Willner S : Preoperative and postoperative instability in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 14 : 591-593, 1989   DOI
8 Khoo LT, Fessler RG : Microendoscopic decompressive laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery (Suppl 5) 51 : S146-154, 2002
9 Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Lew RA, Grobler LJ, Weinstein JN, Brick GW, et al : Lumbar laminectomy alone or with instrumented or noninstrumented arthrodesis in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Patient selection, costs, and surgical outcomes. Spine 22 : 1123-1131, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R : Bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg 97 : 213-217, 2002   PUBMED
11 Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R : Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine 17 : 1-8, 1992   DOI
12 Ikuta K, Arima J, Tanaka T, Oga M, Nakano S, Sasaki K, et al : Shortterm results of microendoscopic posterior decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 2 : 624-633, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Kleeman TJ, Hiscoe AC, Berg EE : Patient outcomes after minimally destabilizing lumbar stenosis decompression : the 'Port-Hole' technique. Spine 25 : 865-870, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Thome C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bazner H, Pockler-Schoniger C, Wohrle J, et al : Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminectomy, bilateral laminectomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 3 : 129-141, 2005   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Aryanpur J, Ducker T : Multilevel lumbar laminotomies : an alternative to laminectomy in the treatment of lumbar stenosis. Neurosurgery 26 : 429-432, 1990   DOI   PUBMED