Browse > Article

Expandable Cage for Cervical Spine Reconstruction  

Zhang, Ho-Yeol (Department of Neurosurgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital)
Thongtrangan, Issada (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center)
Le, Hoang (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center)
Park, Jon (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center)
Kim, Daniel H. (Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society / v.38, no.6, 2005 , pp. 435-441 More about this Journal
Abstract
Objective : Expandable cage used for spinal reconstruction after corpectomy has several advantages over nonexpendable cages. Here we present our clinical experience with the use of this cage after anterior column corpectomy with an average of one year follow up. Methods : Ten patients underwent expandable cage reconstruction of the anterior column after single-level or multilevel corpectomy for various cervical spinal disorders. Anterior plating with or without additional posterior instrumentation were performed in all patients. Functional outcomes, complications, and radiographic outcomes were determined. Results : There was no cage-related complication. Functionally, neurological examination revealed improvement in 7 of 10 patients and no patient had neurological deterioration after the surgery. Immediate stability was achieved and maintained throughout the period of follow-up. There was minimal subsidence [<2mm] noticeable in three of the cases that underwent a two-level corpectomy. Subsidence was noted in osteoporotic patients and patients undergoing multi-level corpectomies. Average pre-operative kyphotic angle was 9 degrees. This was corrected to an average of 5.4 degrees in lordosis postoperatively. Conclusion : In conclusion, expandable cages are safe and effective devices for vertebral body replacement after cervical corpectomy when used in combination with anterior plating with or without additional posterior stabilization. The advantages of using expandable cages include its ability to easily accommodate itself into the corpectomy defect, its ability to tightly purchase into the end plates after expansion and thus minimizing the potential for migration, and finally, its ability to correct kyphosis deformity via its in vivo expansion properties.
Keywords
Cervical corpectomy; Expandable cage; Spinal fusion; Interbody fusion;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 ElSaghir H, Bohm H : Anterior versus posterior plating in cervical corpectomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120 : 549-554, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Narotam PK, Pauley SM, McGinn GJ : Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy : a clinical and radiological study. J Neurosurg 99 : 172-180, 2003   PUBMED
3 Agrillo U, Mastronardi L, Puzzilli F : Anterior cervical fusion with carbon fiber cage containing coralline hydroxyapatite : preliminary observations in 45 consecutive cases of soft-disc herniation. J Neurosurg 96 : 273- 276, 2002   PUBMED
4 Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT : Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine 24 : 1604-1610, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Coumans JV, Marchek CP, Henderson FC : Use of the telescopic plate spacer in treatment of cervical and cervicothoracic spine tumors. Neurosurgery 51 : 417-424, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC : Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone(PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51 : 1343-1350, 2002   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Eleraky MA LC, Llanos C, Sonntag VK : Cervical corpectomy : report of 185 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 90 : 35-41, 1999   DOI
8 Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT, Whitecloud TS 3rd, Pienkowski D : Complications of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with titanium cages and anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 16 : 1-8; discussion 8-9, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Tribus CB CD, Zdeblick TA : The efficacy of anterior cervical plating in the management of symptomatic pseudoarthrosis of the cervical spine. Spine 24 : 860-864, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Siddiqui AA, Jackowski A : Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion. A prospective randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg 85B : 1019-1025, 2003
11 Greene DL, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Park SC, Crandall D : Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft. Spine J 3 : 262-269, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Schnee CL FA, Freese A, Weil RJ, Marcotte PJ : Analysis of harvest morbidity and radiographic outcome using autograft for anterior cervical fusion. Spine 22 : 2222-2227, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Krbec M, Stulik J, Tichy V : Replacement of the vertebral body with an expansion implant (Synex). Acta Chir Orthop traumatol Cech 69 : 158-162, 2002   PUBMED
14 Thome C, Krauss JK, Zevgaridis D : A prospective clinical comparison of rectangular titanium cages and iliac crest autografts in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurosurg Rev 27 : 34-41, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Wittenberg RH, Moeller J, Shea M, White AA 3rd, Hayes WC : Compressive strength of autologous and allogenous bone grafts for thoracolumbar and cervical spine. Spine 15 : 1073-1078, 1990   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
16 Dorai Z, Morgan H, Coimbra C : Titanium cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Neurosurg 99 : 3-7, 2003   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
17 Thalgott JS, Xiongsheng C, Giuffre JM : Single stage anterior cervical reconstruction with titanium mesh cages, local bone graft, and anterior plating. Spine J 3 : 294-300, 2003   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Thongtrangan I BR, Le H, Park J, Kim DH : Vertebral body replacement with an expandable cage for reconstruction after spinal tumor reconstruction. Neurosurg Focus 15 : Article 8, 2003
19 Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Schaefer J, Scholz M, Ludwig K, Schleiher P, et al : Biomechanical comparison of expandable cages for vertebral body replacement in the cervical spine. J Neurosurg 99 : 91-97, 2003   PUBMED
20 Ulmar B, Cakir B, Huch K, Puhl W, Richter M : Vertebral body replacement with expandable titanium cages. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142 : 449-455, 2004   DOI   ScienceOn