Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.12750/JET.2013.28.3.223

Assessment of Equine Temperament by a Questionnaire Survey  

Kim, Nam-Young (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Park, Yong-Sang (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Ko, Moon-Suck (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Chae, Hyun-Seok (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Cho, Won-Mo (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Cho, In-Chul (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Hong, Hyun-Ju (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Park, Ji-Yun (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Chung, Kwang-Yeoun (SAMSUNG EQUESTRIAN TEAM)
Cho, Sang-Rae (Subtropical Animal Experiment Station, National Institute of Animal Science, RDA)
Publication Information
Journal of Embryo Transfer / v.28, no.3, 2013 , pp. 223-227 More about this Journal
Abstract
The objective of the study is to assess temperament of a horse based on general temperament test by a questionnaire survey. Five test criteria were identified: gentleness, patience, aggressiveness, sensitivity, and friendliness, each on a 5-point scale. 114 horses bred at the National Institute of Animal Science (NIAS) in 2010, 2011 and 2012. The horses recorded scores of 3.6~3.9 for gentleness, 3.1~3.6 for patience, 3.4~4.0 for aggressiveness, 2.8~3.2 for sensitivity, and 3.4~3.8 for friendliness, the overall score for sensitivity the lowest. Horses born in 2012 scored lower than the rest in all five areas at a statistically significant level (P<0.05). By gender, the colts scored higher than the fillies in all five areas, but the discrepancy was not statistically significant. Factor analysis yielded only one factor, and the Cronbach's ${\alpha}$ value was 0.980 for standardization of Factor 1, indicating a high reliability of internal consistency. The correlation coefficients among the test criteria ranged between 0.85 and 0.91 (P<0.01). The assessment criteria used in this study are expected to provide a useful basis designing a temperament test horses.
Keywords
horse; temperament; questionnaire;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hausberger M, Roche H, Henry S and Visser EK. 2008. A review of the human-horse relationship. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 109:1-24.   DOI
2 Anderson MK, Friend TH, Evans JW and Bushong DM. 1999. Behavioral assessment of horses in therapeutic riding programs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 63:1124.
3 Bridgeman DJ. 2009. The working relationship between horse and rider during training and competition for equestrian sports. PhD thesis. University of Southern Queensland, pp. 20-24.
4 Gorecka-Bruzda A, Jastrzebska E, Sosnowska Z, Jaworski Z, Jezierski T and Chruszczewski MH. 2011. Reactivity to humans and fearfulness tests: Field validation in Polish Cold Blood Horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 133:207-215.   DOI
5 Koenen EPC, Aldridge LI and Philipsson J. 2004. An overview of breeding objectives for warmblood sport horses. Livest. Prod. Sci. 88:77-84.   DOI
6 Lansade L, Bouissou MF and Erhard HW. 2008a. Reactivity to isolation and association with conspecifics: A temperament trait stable across time and situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 109:355-373.   DOI
7 Lansade L, Bouissou MF and Erhard HW. 2008b. Fearfulness in horses: A temperament trait stable across time and situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 115:182-200.   DOI
8 Lansade L and Bouissou MF. 2008. Reactivity to humans: A temperament trait of horses which is stable across time and situations. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 114:492-508.   DOI
9 Momozawa Y, Ono T, Sato F, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, Mori Y and Kusunose R. 2003 Assessment of equine temperament by a questionnaire survey to caretakers and evaluation of its reliability by simultaneous behavior test. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84:127-138.   DOI
10 Le Scolan N, Hausberger M and Wolff A. 1997. Stability over situations in temperamental traits of horses as revealed by experimental and scoring approaches. Behav. Process 41: 257-266.   DOI
11 Lloyd AS, Martin JE, Bornett-Gauci HLI and Wilkinson RG. 2008. Horse personality: Variation between breeds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 122:369-383.
12 Mills DS. 1998. Personality and individual differences in the horse, their significance, use and measurement. Equine Vet. J. Suppl. 27:10-13.
13 Momozawa Y, Kusunose R, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y and Mori Y. 2005 Assessment of equine temperament questionnaire by comparing factor structure between two separate surveys. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 92:7784.
14 Seaman SC, Davidson HPB and Waran NK. 2002. How reliable is temperament assessment in the domestic horse (Equus caballus)?. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 78:175-191.   DOI
15 Visser EK, van Reenen CG, Hopster H, Schilder MBH, Knaap JH, Barnevald A and Blokhuis HJ. 2001. Quantifying aspects of young horse's temperament: consistency of behavioural variables. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 74:241-258.   DOI
16 Visser EK, Van Reenen CG, Zetterqvist Blokhuis M, Morgan KM, Hassmen P, Rundgren TMM and Blokhuis HJ. 2008. Does horse temperament influence horse-rider cooperation?. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 11:267-284.   DOI
17 Chong-Eon Lee, Nam-Young Kim, Dong-Hee Kang, Kwang-Yeoun Chung, Tae-Hoon Kim. 2010. Horse training & Therapeutic riding horse assesment manual. 1st, Jun communication, Jeju, pp. 3-56