Browse > Article

Effects of Days Open on the Subsequent Reproductive Performance Following to CIDR-Based Estrus Synchronization in Lactating Dairy Cows  

Kang, Hyun-Gu (Laboratory of Theriogenology, Veterinary Medical Center, Chungbuk National University)
Kim, Ill-Hwa (Laboratory of Theriogenology, Veterinary Medical Center, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Embryo Transfer / v.26, no.2, 2011 , pp. 91-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of days open on subsequent reproductive performance following to estrus synchronization in the 114 lactating dairy cows. The animals were divided into two groups according to the time of estrus synchronization; viz, ${\leq}$ 85 days, and > 85 days postpartum, respectively. The estrus synchronization protocol consisted of insertion of a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) device containing 1.9 g progesterone with an injection of 250 ${\mu}g$ gonadorelin (Day 0), an injection of $PGF_2{\alpha}$ and removal of the device on Day 7, an injection of 250 ${\mu}g$ GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 17 h later. Pregnancy diagnosis was determined at 30 to 60 days after TAI using both ultrasonography and rectal palpation. The body condition score (BCS) gradually increased over the postpartum period. In estrus synchronized cows until 85 days, conception rate on first service, number of service per conception, interval from estrus synchronization to conception, and interval from calving to conception were not significantly different among two farms (P>0.05). In estrus synchronized cows after 85 days postpartum, conception rate on first service, number of service per conception and interval from calving to conception were significantly different ($P{\leq}0.05$) between herds A and B (26.8 vs 50.0%; $2.1{\pm}1.35$ vs $1.37{\pm}0.54$ times, $237.3{\pm}97.8$ vs $164.7{\pm}69.3$ days, respectively). In estrus synchronized cows after 85 days postpartum interval from estrus synchronization to conception was greater (P<0.01) in herd B than in herd A ($63.6{\pm}57.4$ vs $26.1{\pm}24.9$). These results indicate that the time of estrus synchronization for maximized the reproductive performance is before 85 days postpartum and feeding and management is important factor for high reproductive performance.
Keywords
dairy cows; reproductive performance; postpartum; estrus synchronization;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Wettemann RP, Lents CA, Ciccioli NH, White FJ and Rubio I. 2003. Nutritional- and suckling-mediated anovulation in beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 81:E48-E59.   DOI
2 Zuluaga JF, Saldarriaga JP, Cooper DA, Cartmill JA and Williams GL. 2010. Presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone increases the proportion of Bos indicus-influenced females ovulating at initiation of synchronization but fails to improve synchronized new follicular wave emergence or fixed-time artificial insemination conception rates using intravaginal progesterone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and prostaglandin $F_2{\alpha}^1$. J. Anim. Sci. 88(5):1663-1671.
3 Spitzer JC, Morrison DG, Wettemann RP and Faulkner LC. 1995. Reproductive responses and calf birth and weaning weights as affected by body condition at parturition and postpartum weight gain in primiparous beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1251-1257.   DOI
4 Sterry RA, Jardon PW and Fricke PM. 2007. Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services. Theriogenology 67:1211-1216.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Stevenson JS, Kobayashi Y and Thompson KE. 1999. Reproductive performance of dairy cows in various programmed breeding systems including Ovsynch and combinations of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin $F_{2{\alpha}}$. J. Dairy Sci. 82:506-515.   DOI
6 Stevenson JS, Smith JF and Hawkins DE. 2000. Reproductive outcomes for dairy heifers treated with combinations of prostaglandin $F_{2}$alpha, norgestomet, and gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2008-2015.   DOI
7 Tenhagen BA, Surholt R, Wittke M, Vogel C, Drillich M and Heuwieser W. 2004. Use of Ovsynch in dairy herds-differences between primiparous and multiparous cows. Anim. Repeod. Sci. 81:1-11.   DOI
8 Walsh S, Buckley F, Berry DP, Rath M, Pierce K, Byrne N and Dillon P. 2007. Effects of breed, feeding system, and parity on udder health and milking characteristics. J. Dairy Sci. 90:5767-5779.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim UH, Suh GH, Hur TY, Kanf SJ, Beak KS, Park SB, Kim HS, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2007. The effects of administering estradiol benzo IH.plus progesterone during the growth or static phases of the dominant follicle in CIDR-treated lactating dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 53:591-596.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kim UH, Suh GH, Nam HW, Kang HG and Kim IH. 2005. Follicularwave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows. Theriogenology 63:260-268.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lamb GC, Dahlen CR, Larson JE, Marquezini G and Stevenson JS. 2010. Control of the estrous cycle to improve fertility for fixed-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: A review. J. Anim. Sci. (Suppl.) 88:E181-E192.   DOI
12 Lee JY and Kim IH. 2006. Advancing parity is associated with high milk production at the cost of body condition and increased periparturient disorders in dairy herds. J. Vet. Sci. 7:161-166.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Honparkhe M, Singh J, Dadarwal D, Dhaliwal GS and Kumar A. 2008. Estrus induction and fertility rates in response to exogenous hormonal administration in postpartum anestrous and subestrus bovines and buffaloes. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 70:1237-1331.
14 Gebeyehu G, Kelay B and Abebe B. 2007. Effect of parity, season and year on reproductive performance and herd life of Friesian cows at Stella private dairy farm, Ethiopia. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19(7):1-8.
15 Gillund P, Reksen O, Grohn YT and Karlberg K. 2001. Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1390-1396.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Hafez ESE and Hafez B. 2000. Reproduction in Farm Animals. 7th ed, Lipincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp. 159-171.
17 Houghton PL, Lemenager RP, Horstman LA, Hendrix KS and Moss GE. 2000. Effects of body composition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1438-1446.
18 Kang BK, Choi HS, Son CH, Oh KS, Kang HK, Kim SJ, Kim HJ and Kim NK. 1995. Progesterone assays as an aid for improving reproductive efficiency in dairy cattle. V. Plasma progesterone determination as applied to the differential diagnosis of reproductive disorders and judgement of treatment responses to $PGF_{2{\alpha}}$ or GnRH treatment. Korean J. Vet. Res. 35:603-613.
19 Kim BH, Lee SK, Kim IH and Kang HG. 2009. The effect of parity and calving seasons on the reproductive performance of Korean native cows. J. Emb. Trans. 24:127-130.
20 Portaluppi MA and Stevenson JS. 2005. Pregnancy rates in lactating dairy cows after presynchronization of estrous cycles and variations of the Ovsynch protocol. J. Dairy Sci. 88:914-921.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Roelofs J, Lopez-Gatius F, Hunter RHF, van Eerdenburg FJCM and Hanzen CH. 2010. When is a cow in estrus? Clinical and practical aspects. Theriogenology 74:327-344.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Sakaguchi M. 2011. Practical aspects of the fertility of dairy cows. J. Reprod. Dev. 57:17-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 SAS. 1999. Users Guide: Statistics, Version 8. 1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
24 Short RE, Bellows RA, Staigmiller RB, Berardinelli JG and Custer EE. 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:799-816.   DOI
25 Son CH, Kang HG and Kim SH. 2001. Application of progesterone measurement for age and body weight at puberty, and postpartum anestrus in Korean native cattle. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 63:1287-1291.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Miller RH, Norman HD, Kuhn MT, Clay JS and Hutchison JL. 2007. Voluntary waiting period and adoption of synchronized breeding in dairy herd improvement herds. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1594-606.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Leitman NR, Busch DC, Wilson DJ, Mallory DA, Ellersieck MR, Smith MF and Patterson DJ. 2009. Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 87:3976-3982.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Melendez P, Duchens M, Perez A, Moraga L and Archbald L. 2008. Characterization of estrus detection, conception and pregnancy risk of Holstein cattle from the central area of Chile. Theriogenology 70:631-637.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Mialot JP, Laumonnier G, Ponsart C, Fauxpoint H, Barassin E, Ponter AA and Deletang F. 1999. Postpartum subestrus in dairy cows: comparison of treatment with prostaglandin $F_{2}$ alpha or GnRH + prostaglandin $F_{2}$ alpha + GnRH. Theriogenology 52(5):901-911.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Moreira F, De la Sota RL, Diaz T and Thatcher WW. 2000. Effect of day of the estrous cycle at the initiation of a timed artificial insemination protocol on reproductive responses of dairy heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1568-1576.   DOI
31 Morrison DG, Spitzer JC and Perkins JL. 1999. Influence of prepartum body condition score change on reproduction in multiparous beef cows calving in moderate body condition. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1048-1054.   DOI
32 Day ML, Burke CR, Taufa VK, Day AM and Macmillan KL. 2000. The strategic use of estradiol to enhance fertility and submission rates of progestin-based estrus synchronization programs in dairy herds. J. Anim. Sci. 78:523-529.   DOI
33 Deutscher GH, Stotts JA and Nielsen MK. 1991. Effect of breeding season length and calving season on range cow productivity. J. Anim. Sci. 69:3453-3460.   DOI
34 Dobson H, Walker SL, Morris MJ, Routly JE and Smith RF. 2008. Why is it getting more difficult to successfully artificially inseminate dairy cows? Animal 2:1104-1111.
35 Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T and Webster G. 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 72:68-8.   DOI
36 Asimwe L and Kifaro GC. 2007. Effect of breed, season, year and parity on reproductive performance of dairy cattle under small holder production system in Bukoba district, Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development 19(10):1-9.
37 Alnimer MA and Lubbadeh WF. 2008. Effect of progesterone (P(4)) intravaginal device (CIDR) to reduce embryonic loss and to synchronize return to oestrus of previously timed inseminated lactating dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 107:36-47.   DOI
38 Alnimer MA, Tabbaa MJ, Ababneh MM and Lubbadeh WF. 2009. Applying variations of the ovsynch protocol at the middle of the estrus cycle on reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows during summer and winter. Theriogenology 72:731-740.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Ansari-Lari M and Abbasi S. 2008. Study of reproductive performance and related factors in four dairy herds in Far province (southern Iran) by Cox proportional-hazard model. Prev. Vet. Med. 85:158-165.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Beam SW and Butler WR. 1999. Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. J. Reprod. Fertil. (Suppl.) 54:411-424.
41 Brusveen DJ, Cunha AP, Silva CD, Cunha PM, Sterry RA, Silva EP, Guenther JN and Wiltbank MC. 2008. Altering the time of the second gonadotropin-releasing hormone injection and artificial insemination (AI) during Ovsynch affects pregnancies per AI in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91:1044-52.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Butler ST, Pelton SH and Butler WR. 2006. Energy balance, metabolic status, and the first postpartum ovarian follicle wave in cows administered propylene glycol. J. Dairy Sci. 89:2938-2951.   DOI   ScienceOn