1 |
Albarracin J, Morato R, Izquierdo D and Mogas T. 2005. Vitrification of calf oocytes: effects of maturation stage and prematuration treatment on the nuclear and cytoskeletal components of oocytes and their subsequent development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72:239-249
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Ahammad MM, Bhattacharyya D and Jana BB. 2002. The hatching of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) embryos in response to exposure to different concentrations of cryoprotectant at low temperatures. Cryobiology 44:114-121
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
ccAtabay EC, Takahashi Y, Katagiri S, Nagano M, Koga A and Kanai Y. 2004. Vitrification of bovine oocytes and its application to intergeneric somatic cell nucleus transfer. Theriogenology 61:15-23
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Bhowmick P, Eroglu A, Wright DL, Toner M and Toth TL. 2002. Osmometric behavior of mouse oocytes in the presence of different intracellular sugars. Cryobiology 45:183-187
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Hurt AE, Landim F, Seidel GE and Squires EL. 2000. Vitrification of immature and mature equine and bovine oocytes in an ethylene glycol, ficoll and sucrose solution using openpulled straws. Theriogenology 54:119-128
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Kim DH, Park HS, Kim SW, Hwang IS, Yang BC, Im GS, Chung HJ, Seong HW, Moo SJ and Yang BS. 2007. Vitrification of immature bovine oocytes by the microdrop method. J. Reprod. Dev. 53:843-851
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Palasz A, Thundatgil J, Funente JDL and Mapletoft RJ. 2000. Effect of reduced concentrations of glycerol and various macromolecules on the cryopreservation of mouse and cattle embryos. Cryobiology 41:35-42
DOI
ScienceOn
|
8 |
Schroeder AC, Champlin AK, Mobraaten LE and Eppig JJ. 1990. Developmental capacity of mouse oocytes cryopreserved before and after maturation in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 89:43-50
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Coticchio G, De Santis L, Rossi G, Borini A, Albertini D, Scaravelli G, Alecci C, Bianchi V, Nottola S and Cecconi S. 2006. Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod. 21:1771-1776
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Candy CJ, Wood MJ, Whittingham DG, Merriman JA and Choudhury N. 1994. Cryopreservation of immature mouse oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 9:1738-1742
DOI
|
11 |
Vieira AD, Mezzalira A, Barbieri DP, Lehmkuhl RC, Rubin MI and Vajta G. 2002. Calves born open pulled straw vitification of immature bovine oocytes. Cryobiology 45:91-94
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Brackett BG and Oliphant G. 1975. Capacitation of rabbit spermatozoa in vitro. Biol. Reprod. 12:c
|
13 |
Sutton RL. 1992. Critical cooling rates of aqueous cryorprotectants in the presence of sugars and polysaccharides. Cryobiology 29:585-598
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Yu I, Songsasen N, Godke RA and Leibo SP. 2002. Differences among dogs in response of their spermatozoa to cryopreservation using various cooling and warming rates. Cryobiology 44:62-78
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Cha KY, Chung HM, Lim JM, Ko JJ, Han SY, Choi DH and Yoon TK. 2000. Freezing immature oocytes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 169:43-47
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Abe Y, Hara K, Matsumoto H, Kobayashi J, Sasada H, Ekwall H, Rodriguez-Martinez H and Sato E. 2005. Feasibility of a nylon-mesh holder for vitrification of bovine germinal vesicle oocytes in subsequent production of viable blastocysts. Biol. Reprod. 72:1416-1420
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Gasparrini B, Attanasio L, De Rosa A, Monaco E, Di Palo R and Campanile G. 2007. Cryopreservation of in vitro matured buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes by minimum volumes vitrification methods. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 98:335-342
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Magnusson V, Feitosa WB, Goissis DM, Amada C, Tavares LMT, Assumpao DOEM and Visintin JA. 2008. Bovine oocyte vitrification: Effect of ethylene glycol concentration and meiotic stages. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 106:265-273
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Wani NA, Mautya SN, Misra AK, Saxena VB and Lakhchaura BD. 2004. Effect of cryoprotectant and their concerntration on in vitro development of vitrified-warmed immaturation oocytes in Buffalo. Theriogenology 61:831-842
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Nottola SA, Macchiarelli G, Coticchio G, Bianchi S, Cecconi S, De Santis L, Scaravelli G, Flamigni C and Borini A. 2007. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum. Reprod. 22:1123-1133
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Hotamisligil S, Toner M and Powers RD. 1996. Changes in membrane integrity, cytoskeletal structure, and developmental potential of murine oocytes after vitrification. Biol. Reprod. 55:161-168
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Cetin Y and Bastan A. 2006. Cryopreservation of immature bovine oocytes by vitrification in straws. 2006. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 92:29-36
DOI
ScienceOn
|
23 |
Takahashi Y and Kanagawa H. 1985. Quick freezing of mouse embryos by direct plunge into liquid nitrogen vapor. Effects of sugars. J. Vet. Res. 33:141-144
|
24 |
Kim YE, Chung KM, Lee CK and Im KS. 1986. Effect of trehalose as a nonpermeable cryoprotectant on the survival of mouse morula frozen-thawed ultrarapidly. Korean J. Anim. Sci. 31:768-773
|
25 |
Romar R and Funahashi H. 2006. In vitro maturation and fertilization of porcine oocytes after a 48 h culture in roscovitine, an inhibitor of p34cdc2/cyclin B kinase. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 92:321-333
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marshella T, Primavera MR, Rocchetta G, Ciotti PM, Magrini O, Seracchioli R, Venturoli S and Flamigni C. 2000. Technical aspects of oocyte cryopreservation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 169:39-42
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Huang J, Li Q, Zhao R, Li W, Han Z, Chen X, Xiao B, Wu S, Jiang Z, Hu J and Liu L. 2008. Effect of sugars on maturation rate of vitrified-thawed immature porcine oocytes. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 106:25-35
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Kuleshova LL, MacFarlane DR, Trounson AO and Shaw JM. 1999. Sugars exert a major influence on the vitrification properties of ethylene glycol-based solutions and have low toxicity to embryos and oocytes. Cryobiology 38:119-130
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
De Santis L, Cino I, Rabellotti E, Papaleo E, Calzi F, Fusi FM, Brigante C and Ferrari A. 2007. Oocyte cyopreservation:Clinical outcome of slow-cooling protocols differing in sucrose concentration. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 14:57-63
DOI
ScienceOn
|