Browse > Article

Effect of Various Factors on Viability of Calves Derived from Embryos Produced In Vitro  

Park Y. S. (Kyongbuk Livestock Research Institue)
Park H. D. (Division of Life Food and Biotech, Daegu University)
Publication Information
Journal of Embryo Transfer / v.20, no.2, 2005 , pp. 97-104 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of various factors such as recipient parity, delivery season, offspring number, pregnancy period, delivery type, midwifery type and dystocia, on the viability of calves derived from embryos produced in vitro. There was no difference in the abnormality of calves among treatments ($0\~25\%$, respectively). The incidence of a disease was significantly higher in delivered by multiparous $(40\%)$ than nulliparous$(9.9\%)$, in eutocia than dystocia group, in delivered on spring $(20.4\%)$ and winter $(22.7\%)$ than summer$(4.3\%)$ and autumn $(0\%)$, in single offspring $(18.4\%)$ than twin offsprings $(6.7\%)$, and in eutocia group $(17\%)$ than dystocia $(2.7\%)$, respectively (p<0.05). The rate of mortality was significantly higher when transferred into mulliparous $(22.3\%)$ than multiparous$(0\%)$, when were delivered within 270 day $(53.3\%)$ than over 270 day $(14.3\~16.1\%)$, when were dystocia $(41.7\%)$ than eutocia$(14.1\%)$ group, when were induced delivery $(44.4\%)$ than self-delivery $(18.1\%)$, when were non-midwifery $(34\%)$ than midwifery$(10.8\%)$, and when delayed midwifery $(31.6\%)$ than earlier midwifery$(11.5\%)$, respectively (p<0.05). The present study suggested that the proper treatment of parturition may be increased the viability of calves derived from in vitro.
Keywords
calves; viability; recipient partity; delivery; pregnancy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Behboodi E, Anderson GB, Bondurant RH, Cargih SL, Kreuscher BR, Medrano JF and Murray JD. 1995. Birth of large calves that developed from in vitro derived bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 44:227-232   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bjorkman C, Alenus S, Emanuelsson ULF and Uggla A. 2000. Neospora caninum and bovine virus diarrhoea virus infections in swedish dairy cows in relation to abortion. Vet. J., 159:201-206   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Bjorkman C, Johansson O, Stenlund S, Holmdahl J and Uggla A. 1996. Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. J.A.V.M.A, 208:1441-1444
4 Greve T, Avery Band Callesen H. 1993. Viability of in-vivo and in-vitro produced bovine embryos. Reprod. Domestic Anim., 28:164-169   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Govacs F, Magyar T, Rinehart C, Elbers K, Schlesinger K and Ohnesorge WC. 2003. The live attenuated bovine viral diarrhea virus components of a multi-valent vaccine confer protection against fetal infection. Vet. Microbiol., 96:117-131   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kruip TAM and den Daas JHG. 1997. In vitro produced and cloned embryos: effects on pregnancy, parturition and offspring. Theriogenology, 47:43-52   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Meyer CL, Berger PJ, Koehler KJ, Thompson JR and Sattler CG. 2001. Phenotypic trends in incidence of stillbirth for Holstein in the United States. J. Dairy Sci., 84:515-523   DOI   ScienceOn
8 King KK, Seidel Jr GE and Efsden RP. 1985. Bovine embryo transfer pregnancies. I. Abortion rates and characteristics of cysts. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 747-762   DOI
9 Jonker FH. 2004. Fetal death: comparative aspects in large domestc animals. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 82:415-430   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Rodak L, Babiuk LA and Acres SD. 1982. Radioimmunological(RIA) and enzymimmunological (ELISA) detection of coronavirus antibodies in bovine serum and lacteal secretions. J. Clin. Microbiol., 16:34-40
11 Schmidt M, Greve T, Avery B, Beckers JF, Sullon J and Hansen HB. 1996. Pregnancies, calves and calf viability after transfer of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Theriogenology, 46:527-539   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Numabe T, Oikawa T, Kikuchi T and Horiuchi T. 2000. Production efficiency of Japanese black calves by transfer of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology, 54:1409-1420   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Agca Y, Monson RL, Northey DL, Mazni AO, Schaefer DM and Rutledge JJ. 1998. Transfer of fresh and cryopreserved IVP bovine embryos: Normal calving, birth weight and gestation lengths. Theriogenology, 50:147-162   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Garry FB, Adams R, McCann JP and Odde KG. 1996. Postnatal characteristics of calves produced by nuclear transfer cloning. Theriogenology, 45:141-152   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Pedersen J. 1991. A survey of multibirths in 1985-1989 in the Danish dairy breeds. Analysesektionen, Landskontoret for kvseg, 1991
16 박용수. 2004. 한우 체내, 체외 및 복제 수정란이 이식된 수란우의 임신과 분만 및 산자의 생존. 한국수정란이식학회지, 19:239-244   과학기술학회마을
17 Farin PW and Farin CE. 1995. Transfer of bovine embryos produced in vivo or in vitro: Survival and fetal development. Biol, Reprod., 52:676-682   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Mellor DJ and Stafford KJ. 2004. Animal welfare implications of neonatal mortality and morbidity in farm animals. Vet. J., 168:118-133   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Brown BW and Radziewic T. 1996. In vitro production of sheep embryos and growth rates of resultant lambs. Proc. of 13th Int. Congr. Anim. Reprod. Sydney Australia, 3:P22-16
20 Hasler JF, Henderson WB, Hurtgen PJ, Jin ZQ, McCauley AD, Mower SA, Neely B, Shuey LS, Stokes JE and Trimmer SA. 1995. Production, freezing and transfer of bovine IVF embryos and subsequent calving results. Theriogenology, 43:141-152   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sakaguchi M, Geshi M, Hamano S, Yonai M and Nagai T. 2002. Embryonic and calving losses in bovine mixed-breed twins induced by transfer of in vitro-produced embryos to bred recipients, Anim. Reprod. Sci., 72:209-221   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Crouch CF, Oliver S, Hearle DC, Buckley A, Chapman AJ and Francis MJ. 2001. Lactogenic immunity following vaccination of cattle with bovine coronavirus, Vaccine, 19:189-196   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Heyman Y, Chesne P, Thudard JM, Lebourhis D, Marchal J and Nibart M. 1994. Birth of cloned calves after nuclear transfer from sexed embryos. 10th Reunion, A.E.T.A.I. Abst., pp.180