Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.12.1015

A Study on the GIS-based Deterministic MCDA Techniques for Evaluating the Flood Damage Reduction Alternatives  

Lim, Kwang-Suop (Korea Institute of Water and Environment, K-Water)
Kim, Joo-Cheol (Korea Institute of Water and Environment, K-Water)
Hwang, Eui-Ho (Korea Institute of Water and Environment, K-Water)
Lee, Sang-Uk (Korea Institute of Water and Environment, K-Water)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Water Resources Association / v.44, no.12, 2011 , pp. 1015-1029 More about this Journal
Abstract
Conventional MCDA techniques have been used in the field of water resources in the past. A GIS can offer an effective spatial data-handling tool that can enhance water resources modeling through interfaces with sophisticated models. However, GIS systems have a limited capability as far as the analysis of the value structure is concerned. The MCDA techniques provide the tools for aggregating the geographical data and the decision maker's preferences into a one-dimensional value for analyzing alternative decisions. In other words, the MCDA allows multiple criteria to be used in deciding upon the best alternatives. The combination of GIS and MCDA capabilities is of critical importance in spatial multi-criteria analysis. The advantage of having spatial data is that it allows the consideration of the unique characteristics at every point. The purpose of this study is to identify, review, and evaluate the performance of a number of conventional MCDA techniques for integration with GIS. Even though there are a number of techniques which have been applied in many fields, this study will only consider the techniques that have been applied in floodplain decision-making problems. Two different methods for multi-criteria evaluation were selected to be integrated with GIS. These two algorithms are Compromise Programming (CP), Spatial Compromise Programming (SCP). The target region for a demonstration application of the methodology was the Suyoung River Basin in Korea.
Keywords
GIS; MCDA; flood damage; compromise programming; spatial compromise programming; fuzzy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tauxe, R.R. Inman, and Mades, D.M. (1979). "Multiobjectives dynamic programming with application to a reservoir." Water Resources Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1403-1408.   DOI
2 Tkach, R.J., and Simonovic, S.P. (1997). "A new approach to multi-criteria decision making in water resources." Journal of Geographic Information and Decision Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-44.
3 Traore, Z.N., and Fontane, D.G. (2007). "Managing drought impacts: Case study of Mali, Africa." Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 133, No. 4, pp. 300-308.   DOI
4 Tsihrintzis, V.A., Hamind, R., and Fuentes, H.R. (1996). "Use of Geographic Information System(GIS) in Water Resources: A Review." Water Resources Management, Vol. 10, Number 4, pp. 251-277.   DOI
5 Zeleny, M. (1973). Compromise Programming Multiple criteria decision making, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, pp. 262-301.
6 Zeleny, M. (1974). Linear multiobjective programming Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York.
7 이현재, 심명필(2002). "계층분석과정(AHP)에 의한 가뭄 시 용수배분 우선순위 의사 결정." 한국수자원학회 논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제35권, 제6호, pp. 703-714.
8 채미옥, 오용준(2003). "토지적성평가의 지표추출 및 지표별 가중치 분석방법 고찰". 대한지리학회 논문집, 대한지리학회, 제38권, 제5호, pp. 725-740.   과학기술학회마을
9 최동진, 박희경(2000). "다요소 의사결정 기법을 이용한 수도산업 민영화 시나리오의 분석." 대한토목학회 논문집, 대한토목학회, 제20권, 제1-B호, pp. 175-187.   과학기술학회마을
10 한국개발연구원(2000), 예비타당성조사 수행을 위한 일반 지침 연구(개정판).
11 한국개발연구원(2001), 수자원(댐)부분사업의 예비타당성 조사 표준지침연구(개정판).
12 한국개발연구원(2002), 기존댐 합리적 용수배분을 통한 수리권 조정 방안 연구.
13 Nirupama, and Simonovic, S.S. (2002). A spatial fuzzy compromise approach for flood disaster management The Institute of Catastrophic Loss Reduction, London, Ontario.
14 Dauer, J.P., and Krueger, R.J. (1980). "A multiobjective optimization model for water resources planning." Appl. Math. Model., Vol. 4, pp. 171-175.   DOI
15 Goicoechea, A., Hansen, D.R., and Duckstein, L. (1982). Multiobjective decision analysis with engineering and business applications. Wiley, New York, N. Y.
16 Kane, J., Vertinsky, I., and Thompson, W. (1973). "KSIM: A methodology for interactive resource simulation." Water Resources Research, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 65-79.   DOI
17 Novoa, J.I., and Halff, A.H. (1977). "Management of Flooding in a Fully-Developed Low-Cost Housing Neighborhood." Water Resources Bulletin, Vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 1237-1252.   DOI
18 Queensland, T.S.O. (2002). "Guidance on the Assessment of Tangible Flood Damages." D.O.N.R.A. Mines, ed.
19 Romero, C., and Rehman, T. (2003). Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions Elsevier, Amsterdam, Boston.
20 김성희, 정병호, 김재경(2003). 의사결정분석 및 응용, 영지문화사.
21 김수정(1999). GIS 기반 의사결정기법을 활용한 홍수재해 관리, 석사학위논문, 세종대학교.
22 김채승(1999). 퍼지집합에 기반한 GIS 적지분석에 관한 연구-무등산 도립공원 자연보존지구 적지분석을 사례로, 석사학위논문, 전남대학교.
23 남광우(1998). 퍼지집합개념과 AHP를 이용한 GIS 환경 에서의 공간의사결정에 관한 연구-토지적합성평가와 시설입지분석에 관한 의사결정을 중심으로, 석사학위논문, 부산대학교.
24 박태선(2002). "계층분석법을 이용한 하천의 중요도 평가 기법." 한국수자원학회논문집, 한국수자원학회, 제35 권, 제6호, pp. 685-692.
25 윤하연(1999). 인천광역시 환경지표의 개발과 적용. 연구 보고서 99-13, 인천발전연구원
26 이재응, 남동성(2007). 다기준의사결정기법을 이용한 안동다목적댐의 수문학적 안정성 증대방안 결정, 국토연구원.
27 이충성(2007). 유역치수계획 최적대안 결정을 위한 의사 결정모형의 개발, 박사학위논문, 인하대학교.