Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.8.663

Allocation of Water Supplied by Multi-Purpose Dam Using the Estimate of Weighting Factors  

Yi, Choong-Sung (인하대학교 환경토목공학부)
Choi, Seung-An (인하대학교 환경토목공학)
Shim, Myung-Pil (인하대학교 환경토목공학)
Jung, Kwan-Sue (충남대학교 토목공학과)
Publication Information
Journal of Korea Water Resources Association / v.37, no.8, 2004 , pp. 663-674 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the principle of water allocation is proposed based on efficiency, equity, sustainability. Also weighting factors are estimated with sectoral factors and regional factors. The former represents relative weights among water use and the latter represents physical characteristics of water demand places. The AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) is applied to estimate the sectoral factors, and compounded regional-characteristic factors and regional-scale factors, which reflects socioeconomic statistics for the regional factors. By applying these weighting factors, water allocation rules for dam is developed and applied to Andong dam which supplies water to parts of Busan Shi, Daegu Shi and Goryeong Gun in a water-deficit situation. As a result, it is estimated that Water allocation by priorities distributes the entire water shortage to the lowest rank of water sectors or regions, while water allocation by relative weighting factors disperse all the burdens of water shortage to all sectors and regions.
Keywords
water allocation; efficiency; equity; sustainability; weighting factor; AHP;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ringler, C. (2001). Optimal Allocation and Use of Water Resources in the Mekong River Basin : Multi-Country and Intersectoral Analyses. Peter Lang., Germany, pp. 5-14
2 Satty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York
3 World Bank (1998). Water Allocation Mechanisms Principles and Examples. Washington, D.C.
4 건설교통부 (2000a). 수리권 거래제도 도입방안 연구
5 건설교통부 (2000b). 수자원장기종합계획
6 한국건설기술연구원 (1998). 수리권제도, 건기연 98-004
7 World Bank (1999). Inter Sectoral Water Allocation, Planning and Management. Washington, D.C.
8 이현재 (2003). 가뭄시 용수배분을 고려한 저수지 운영. 박사학위논문, 인하대학교. pp. 63-81   과학기술학회마을
9 한국수자원공사 (2002b). 다목적댐 운영 실무편람
10 Satty, T. L. (1977). 'A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures.' Journal of Mathmatical Psychology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 234-281, June 1977   DOI
11 한국수자원공사 (2002a). 기존댐 합리적 용수배분을 통한 수리권 조정방안 연구
12 최승안 (2002). 수자원의 최적배분을 위한 AQUARIUS 모형의 적용성 연구. 석사학위논문, 인하대학교
13 Ridgley, M. A. (1992). 'Selection of Water-Supply Projects under Drought.' Journal of Environmental Systems, Baywood Publishing, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 207-221
14 한동근, 김종원 (2000). '유수자원(流水資源)의 지역간 배분보상.' 자원 환경경제연구, 한국환경경제학회, 제9권, 제4호, pp. 621-639
15 MAF (2001). Economic Efficiency of Water Allocation. MAF Technical Paper No : 2001/7, Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, New Zealand
16 Caponera, D.C. (1992). Principles of Water Law and Administration, Balkema, Rotterdam
17 Karkkainen, T. (2001). Pricing Irrigation Water(With a focus on developing countary). Research Report 2001, Helsinki University of Technology
18 Ridgley, M.A. (1993). 'A Multicriteria Approach to Allocating Water During Drought.' Resource Management and Optimization, Harwood Academic Publishers Gmbll, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 135-149