Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2019.35.1.55

Analysis of Water-Quality Constituents Variations before and after Weir Construction in South Han River using Probability Distribution  

Kim, Kyung Sub (Department of Civil, Safety & Environmental Engineering, Hankyong National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
The Four Major Rivers Restoration Project started in 2009 and completed in early 2013 is a large-scale inter-ministry SOC project investing ₩22.2 $10^{12}$ and one of the Project's objectives was to enhance the water-quality grade through recovering the river eco-system and environment. The average concentration and probability distribution of water-quality constituents at given and selected sampling sites are very significant elements for analyzing and controlling the water-quality of rivers or reservoirs effectively. Average concentration can be estimated by point estimator, distribution function of water-quality constituents or Bootstrap method, in which the distribution function estimated with more data in case of insufficient dataset, is applied. Ipo and Gangcheon water-quality monitoring stations in South Han River were selected to compare and analyze the variation of concentration before and after Ipo and Gangcheon Weirs construction, using the whole 4-year's data, from 2005 to 2008 and from 2014 to 2017. Water-quality constituents such as BOD and COD relating to oxygen demanding wastes and TP and Chlorophyll-a relating to the process of nutrient enrichment called eutrophication were also selected. The guidelines for water-quality control and management after weir construction including evaluation of water-quality constituents' variations can be presented by this paper.
Keywords
Average concentration; Probability distribution; South Han River; Water-quality constituents variations; Weir construction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ang, A. H. S. and Tang, W. H. (2007). Probability concepts in engineering : emphasis on applications to civil and environmental engineering, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 293-296.
2 Chang, K. Y., Hong, K. O., and Pak, S. I. (2007). Bootstrap simulation for quantification of uncertainty in risk assessment, Journal of Veterinary Science, 47(2), 259-263.
3 Chapra, S. C. (1997). Surface water-quality modeling, McGraw-Hill, New York, 317-341.
4 Di Toro, D. M. (1984). Probability model of stream quality due to runoff, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 110(3), 607-628.   DOI
5 Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap method: Another look at the jackknife, The annuals of statistics, Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 7(1), 1-26.
6 Franceschini, S. and Tsai, C. W. (2008). Incorporating reliability into the definition of the margin of safety in total maximum daily load calculation, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 134(1), 34-44.   DOI
7 Han, K. Y., Kim, S. H., and Bae, D. H. (2001). Stochastic water quality analysis using reliability method, Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37(3), 695-708.   DOI
8 Jhun, M. (1990). A computer intensive method for modern statistical data analysis I; bootstrap method and its applications, Journal of the Korean Statistical Society, 3(1), 121-141. [Korean Literature]
9 Kim, K. S. (2010). Analysis of BOD mean concentration and confidence interval using bootstrap technique, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 26(2), 297-302. [Korean Literature]
10 Kim, K. S. and Ahn, T. (2010). Characteristics of probability distribution of BOD concentration in Anseong stream watershed, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 25(3), 425-431. [Korean Literature]
11 Kim, K. S., Kim, B., and Kim, J. H. (2002). Robust measures of location in water-quality data, Water Engineering Research, 3(3), 195-202.
12 Li, K. S. (1992). Point-estimate method for calculating statistical moments, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 118(7), 1506-1511.   DOI
13 Manly, B. F. J. (2006). Randomization, bootstrap and monte carlo methods in biology, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Florida.
14 Melching, C. S. and Yoon, C. G. (1996). Key sources of uncertainty in QUAL2E model of Passaic river, Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, ASCE, 122(2), 105-113.   DOI
15 Ministry of Environment (ME). (2018). Water Environment Information System (WEIS), http://water.nier.go.kr (accessed Aug. 2018).
16 Novotny, V. (2004). Simplified databased total maximum daily loads, or the world is log-normal, Journal of Environmental Engineering, 130(6), 674-683.   DOI
17 Tung, Y. K. and Hathhorn, W. E. (1988). Assessment of probability distribution of dissolved oxygen deficit, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 114(6), 1421-1435.   DOI
18 Reckhow, K. H., Clements, J. T., and Dodd, R. C. (1990). Statistical evaluation of mechanistic water-quality models, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 116(2), 250-268.   DOI
19 Schwarz, G. E., Hoos, A. B., Alexander, R. B., and Smith, R. A. (2006). The SPARROW surface water-quality model: theory, application and user documentation, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
20 Tsai, C. W. and Franceschini, S. (2005). Evaluation of probabilistic point estimate methods in uncertainty analysis for environmental engineering application, Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 131(3), 387-395.   DOI