Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2017.33.1.1

Investigation on the Factors Affecting Urban Stormwater Management Performance of Bioretention Systems  

Geronimo, Franz Kevin F. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
Maniquiz-Redillas, Marla C. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
Hong, Jungsun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
Kim, Lee-Hyung (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
Publication Information
Abstract
Bioretention systems, an advance low impact development and green infrastructure approach were currently utilized in different parts of the world because it promotes biodiversity thereby mimicking and preserving the pre-developed state of an area. This study investigated and compared the capability of four bioretention systems to identify factors affecting the hydraulic capabilities and pollutant removal efficiencies of each system. The two bioretention type A referred as Type A-C and Type A-FC were planted with perennials such as Chrysanthemum and Fan columbine, respectively. On the other hand, the two type B bioretention systems referred as Type B-A and Type B-JM were planted with shrub plant species such as Azalea and Japanese Meadowsweet, respectively. Based on the results, TV, infiltration mechanism, filter media depth and plant species were identified as the factors affecting the difference in flow attenuation, retained volume and pollutant removal efficiency of Type A-C, Type A-FC, Type B-A and Type B-JM bioretention systems. The design of bioretention Type B-A and Type B-JM were advantageous considering greater volume retention, groundwater recharge, longer HRT and peak flow attenuation and greater pollutant removal efficiency. On the other hand, the design of bioretention Type A-C and Type A-FC was more appropriate for design considering reduced groundwater contamination.
Keywords
Bioretention; Event mean concentration; Flow attenuation; Green infrastructures; Low Impact Development;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Mangangka, I., Liu, A., Egodawatta, P., and Goonetilleke, A. (2015). Performance Characterisation of a Stormwater Treatment Bioretention Basin, Journal of Environmental Management, 150, 173-178.
2 Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C. and Kim, L. H. (2016). Evaluation of the Capability of Low-impact Development Practices for the Removal of Heavy Metal from Urban Stormwater Runoff, Environmental Technology, 37(18), 2265-2272.   DOI
3 Thompson, A. M., Paul, A. C., and Balster, N. J. (2008). Physical and Hydraulic Properties of Engineered Soil Media for Bioretention Basins, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 51(2), 499-514.
4 Trowsdale, S. A. and Simcock, R. (2011). Urban Stormwater Treatment Using Bioretention, Journal of Hydrology, 397, 167-174.   DOI
5 American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association(AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (eighteenth edition), Greenberg, A. E., Clesceri, L. S., and Eaton, A. D. (Eds.), APHA, AWWA, WEF, Washington, DC.
6 Cho, S. J., Kang, M. J., Kwon, H., Lee, J. W., and Kim, S. D. (2013). Evaluation on the Effectiveness of Low Impact Development Practices in an Urban Area: Non-point Pollutant Removal Measures Using EPA-SWMM, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 29(4), 466-475. [Korean Literature]
7 Davis, A. P., Shokouhian, M., Sharma, H., Minami, C., and Winogradoff, D. (2003). Water Quality Improvement through Bioretention: Lead, Copper, and Zinc Removal, Water Environment Research, 75(1), 73-82.   DOI
8 Endreny, T. and Collins, V. (2009). Implications of Biretention Basin Spatial Arrangements on Stormwater Recharge and Groundwater Mounding, Ecological Engineering, 35, 670-677.   DOI
9 Flores, P. E., Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C., Tobio, J. S., and Kim, L. H. (2015). Evaluation on the Hydrologic Effects After Applying an Infiltration Trench and a Tree Box Filter as Low Impact Development (LID) Techniques, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 31(1), 12-18.   DOI
10 Geronimo, F. K. F., Maniquiz-Redillas, M. C., Tobio, J. A. S., and Kim, L. H. (2014). Treatment of Suspended Solids and Heavy Metals from Urban Stormwater Runoff by a Tree Box Filter, Water Science & Technology, 69(12), 2460-2467.   DOI
11 Kalra, T. P. (1998). Handbook of Reference Methods for Plant Analysis, Soil and Plant Analysis Council, Inc.
12 Kazemi, F., Beecham, S., and Gibbs, J. (2011). Streetscape Biodiversity and the Role of Bioretention Swales in an Australian Urban Environment, Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 139-148.   DOI
13 Khan, U. T., Valeo, C., Chu, A., and Van Duin, B. (2012). Bioretention Cell Efficacy in Cold Climates: Part 1 - Hydrologic Performance, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 39, 1210-1221.   DOI
14 Kim, M. H., Sung, C. Y., Li, M. H., and Chu, K. H. (2011). Bioretention for Stormwater Quality Improvement in Texas: Removal Effectiveness of Escherichia Coli, Separation and Purification Technology, 84, 120-124.
15 Kim, J. J., Kim, T. D., Choi, D. H., and Jeon, J. H. (2011). Design of Structural BMPs for Low Impact Development Application and Modelling its Effect on Reduction of Runoff and Nonpoint Source Pollution: Application of LIDMOD2, Journal of Korean Society on Water Environment, 27(5), 580-586. [Korean Literature]
16 Kluge, B., Markert, A., Facklam, M., Sommer, H., Kaiser, M., Pallasch, M., and Wessolek, G. (2016). Metal Accumulation and Hydraulic Performance of Bioretention Systems After Long-term Operation, Journal of Soils and Sediments, 8, 1-11.
17 Li, M. H., Swapp, M., Kim, M. H., Chu, K. H., and Sung, C. Y. (2014). Comparing Bioretention Design with and Without an Internal Water Storage Layer for Treating Highway Runoff, Water Environment Research, 86, 1-11.
18 Liu, J., Sample, D. J., Bell, C., and Guan, Y. (2014). Review and Research Needs of Bioretention Used for the treatment of Urban Stormwater, Water, 6, 1069-1099.   DOI