Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.15681/KSWE.2015.31.6.715

A Study on the Activation of Non-government Participation in Total Maximum Daily Load System using Private Discharge Facilities Reduction Potential Analysis  

Kim, Hongtae (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Shin, Dongseok (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Kim, Hyeonjeong (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Choi, Inuk (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Lee, Miseon (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Kim, Yongseok (National Institute of Environmental Research Watershed Pollution Load Management Research Division)
Publication Information
Abstract
Four major river basin in Korea has been managed with Total Maximum Daily Load(TMDL) System. Water quality indicators as targeted pollutants for TMDL were BOD and TP. In order to satisfy water quality criteria, government allocation using public treatment facilities and its action plan has been used. However, the role to improve water quality were recently faced to its limitation. It is time to require the role of non-government allocation in private discharge facilities to control good water quality. This study investigated three different scenarios in reduction demands of non-government allocations about industry and private sewages. The three different scenarios were discharge under 1) legal water quality standard, 2) water quality level in 2011 and 3) current water quality level with maximum value in group. The results showed that reduction potential in water discharge for TP indicator was 1,118kg/day, under second scenario with 20% of deduction. This results arrived at 42% of whole reduction potential costs and 0.012mg/L improvement in water quality. In conclusion, to intrigue voluntary participation in non-government allocation, various benefits such as tax reduction, tax exemption, and water quality trading should be provided.
Keywords
Non-government allocation; Private discharge facilities; Reduction potential; Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL);
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2012). 2011yr National Pollutant Source Survey, National Institute of Environment Research, pp. 64-91. [Korean Literature]
2 National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2014). TMDL Technical Guideline, National Institute of Environment Research, pp. 49-83. [Korean Literature]
3 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (1999). Draft Guidance for Water Quality-based Decisions: The TMDL Process (Second Edition), United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 43-76.
4 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (2003). Water Quality Trading Policy Statement, United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 4-11.
5 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (2004). Water Quality Trading Assessment Handbook, United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 27-72.
6 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (2008). EPA Water Quality Trading Evaluation Final report, United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 16-26.
7 United States Environmental Protection Agency (U. S. EPA). (2009). Water Quality Trading Toolkit for Permit Writers, United States Environmental Protection Agency, pp. 28-33.
8 Ahn, T. U., Choi, I. C., Yu, S. J., Chung, H. M., Kwon, O. S., Son, D. H., Kim, W. K., Lee, D. H., and Yeom, I. T. (2007). The Characteristics and Management of the Individual Sewage Treatment System, Korean Water Congress 2014, Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, pp. 445-446. [Korean Literature]
9 Lee, H. S., Choi, I. S., and Oh, J. M. (2004). Investigation of out-flow Water Quality and Treatment Efficiency of Sewage Water with Business Types in Yang-Pyeong, Korean Water Congress 2004, Korean Society on Water Environment and Korean Society of Water and Wastewater, pp. 712-716. [Korean Literature]
10 Choi, I. U., Shin, D. S., Kim, H. T., Park, J. H., Ahn, K. H., and Kim, Y. S. (2015). The Allocation Methods for Economical Efficiency Using an Optimized Model, Journal of Koream Society on Water Environment, 31(3), pp. 295-303. [Korean Literature]   DOI
11 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2008a). Sanitary Treatment Plant Investment Plan, Ministry of Environment, pp. 28-45. [Korean Literature]
12 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2008b). Sewerage Plan Economical Efficiency Assessment Method, Ministry of Environment, pp. 21-56. [Korean Literature]
13 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2012a). 2011yr Statistics of Sewerage, Ministry of Environment, pp. 3-10. [Korean Literature]
14 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2012b), 2011yr Sanitary Treatment Plant Operating and Management Condition Analysis, Ministry of Environment, pp. 3-8. [Korean Literature]
15 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2013). Private Discharge Facility Allocation Method and Economical Efficiency Analysis, Ministry of Environment, pp. 6-94. [Korean Literature]
16 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2014a). TMDL Basic Guideline, Ministry of Environment, pp. 10-11. [Korean Literature]
17 Ministry of Environment (MOE). (2014b). TMDL Action Plan Assessment Guide, Ministry of Environment, pp. 4-6. [Korean Literature]
18 National Institute of Environment Research (NIER). (2011). 3-Major River 1st stage TMDL Action Plan Achievement Assessment, National Institute of Environment Research, pp. 121-181. [Korean Literature]