Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.11001/jksww.2022.36.6.427

Distribution characteristics of impervious area according to urban watershed development status and calculation of average impervious area ratio by land use  

Seonghwan Hwang (Technology Development Headquarter, Seoul Institute of Technology)
Youngran Kim (Technology Development Headquarter, Seoul Institute of Technology)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater / v.36, no.6, 2022 , pp. 427-437 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was conducted to identify the distribution characteristics of the impervious area in urban watersheds and to reduce the deviation of the impervious area ratio that occurs depending on the degree of construction of land surface condition data. The average impervious area ratio by land use that can be applied to the calculation of the urban impervious area ratio was derived by statistically analyzing the distribution characteristics of the impervious area ratio by land use according to the urban watershed conditions. In urban watersheds, the change in impervious area ratio over the past 20 years has continuously increased in watersheds with an impervious area ratio of less than 60%, and decreased in watersheds with a high impervious area ratio of 60% or more. The average impervious area ratio by land use applicable to the land use technique is "Residential area" 84.0%, "Residential and commercial mix" 93.6%, "Commercial and business facilities" 89.8%, "Industrial land" 84.8%, "Public land" 47.3%, "Transportation facility" 93.3%, "Urban revitalization facility" 61.1%, "Bare land" 17.6%, "Special area" 11.4%, "Forest and open space" 3.5%, "Rivers and lakes" 9.2%. As a result of examining the adequacy of the average impervious area ratio by land use, the difference between the calculated value of the impervious area ratio using land use techniques and the actual impervious area ratio of the biotope map ranged from -3.0%p to 2.6%p at the significance level of 95%. In addition, when the watershed condition is applied, the difference ranged from -2.3%p to 1.7%p. By applying the average impervious area ratio by land use derived in this study, it was found that the impervious area ratio of the target urban watershed could be calculated within a deviation of ±3%p.
Keywords
Development status; Average impervious area ratio by land use; Land use; Urban watershed conditions; Land use technique;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Brabec, E., Schulte, S. and Richards, P.L. (2002). Impervious surface and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning, J. Plann. Liter., 16(4): 499-514.   DOI
2 Cappiella, B. (2001). Impervious cover and land use in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Watershed Protection Techniques, Additional SPECIAL ISSUE: Urban Lake Management; Ellicott City, 3(Iss. 4).
3 Choi, J.Y., Kim, B.I., Park, B.S. and Chung, E.S. (2008). Applicability of impervious cover index for Water Environment Management, J. Korean Soc. Water Environ., 24(6), 767-772.
4 Derek, B.B. and Lorin, E.R. (1993). Consequences of urbanization on aquatic system: Measured Effect, Degradation Thresholds, and Corrective Strategies, Watershed '93 A National Conference on Watershed Management, U. S. Envir. Protec. Agency, 545-550.
5 Han River Water System Management Committee(HRWSMC) (2006). Basic survey for basin management index application 2nd Year Report.
6 Hasse, J. and Dornisch, V. (2009). Integrating impervious surface management and smart growth development in New Jersey, J. Middle State Div. Geogr., 42, 9-17.
7 Jones, R.C. and Christopher, C.C. (1987). Impact of watershed urbanization on stream insect communities, Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 23(6), 1047-1056.   DOI
8 John, G. (1991). Thermal Impacts Associated With Urbanization and Stormwater Management Best Management Practices. Metro. Washington Coun. of Govern., Maryland Depart. of Environ., Washington, D.C.
9 Kim, Y.R., Hwang, S.H. and Lee, Y.S. (2020). Development of water circulation status estimation model by using multiple linear regression analysis of urban characteristic factors, J. Korean Soc. Water Wastewater, 34(6), 503-512.   DOI
10 Kim, Y.R., Hwang, S.H. and Lee, Y.S. (2021). Development of calculating daily maximum ground surface temperature depending on fluctuations of impermeable and green area ratio by urban land cover types, J. Korean Soc. Water Wastewater, 34(6), 163-174.
11 Lee, J.J. (1998). The study on the important factors of the amenity in multi-family housing estates, J. Korean Ins. Lands. Archi., 26(3), 118-133.
12 Ministry of Environment(MOE) (2012). A study on the introduction of the permeable area ratio system for efficient watershed management.
13 MOE and Korea Enviroment Corporation(KEC) (2013). National impervious area ratio survey and improvement plan study.
14 Pappas, E.A., Smith, D.R., Huang, C., Shuster, W.C., and Bonta, J.V. (2007). Impervious surface impacts to runoff and sediment discharge under laboratory rainfall simulation, CATENA, 72(1), 146-152.
15 Shaver, E.M.J., Curtis, G. and Carter, D. (1995). Watershed protection using an integrated approach, In Stormwater NPDES Related Monitoring Needs, Engineering Foundation, American Society of Civil Engineers.
16 Park, H.S, Choi, H.G. and Jeong, S.W. (2015). Analysing the effect of impervious cover management techniques on the reduction of runoff and pollutant loads, J. Environ. Impact Asse., 24(1), 16-34.   DOI
17 Park, C.Y. and Shin, S.Y. (2014). Analyzing the flood reduction effects of urban impervious surfaces control, Seoul Urban Res., 15(1), 85-99.
18 Richard, D.K. (1979). Urbanization and stream quality impairment, Water Resources Bulletin, Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 15, 948-963.
19 Seoul Metropolitan Government(SMG). (2004) Basic plan for water circulation in Seoul
20 Shun, K.N. (1983) Management of housing environment stock, Annual Report of Architectural Research Institute.
21 Stankowski, S.J. (1972). Population density as an indicator of urban and suburban Land-Surface modification, Geological survey professional paper 800-B, B219-B224.
22 Uhm, J.S. (2004). Utilization of remote sensing and GIS in aggregate control of urban impervious coverage, Korea Environmental Institute, J. Environ. Impact Asse., 13(5), 263-276.
23 Washburn, B., Yancey, K., and Mendoza, J. (2010). User's Guide for the California Impervious Surface Coefficients, Office of Environ. Health Hazard Assess., California Environ. Protec. Agen.