1 |
Shin, H.J., Jeon, C.H., Choi, I.C. and Yeon, I.C. (2009) Estimation of Beneficiary's Willingness to Pay in Mid.down-stream Area to the Water Quality Improvements in upper Bukhan River Basin, Seoul Urban Studies, 10, pp.91-106.
|
2 |
Sutherland, R.J. (1982) A Regional Approach to Estimating Recreation Benefits of Improved Water Quality, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 9, pp.229-247.
DOI
|
3 |
Park, D.H., Park, Y.S. and Lee, K.M. (2006) Consumer's Willingness to Pay for Residential Water and It's Policy Implication, J. Korea Water Resources Association, 39, pp.563-574.
DOI
|
4 |
Pyo, H .D., Yoo, S.H. and Kwak, S.J. (2001) Estimating the Conservation Value of Coastal Wetlands around the Youngsan River: The Application of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Format of the Contingent Valuation Method, J. the Korean Regional Science Association, 17, pp.37-54.
|
5 |
Stenger, A. and Willinger, M. (1998) Preservation Value for Ground water Quality in a Large Aquifer: A Contingent Valuation Study of The Alsatian Aquifer, Journal of Environmental Management, 53, pp.177-193.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Yang, J.W. (1997) Estimating Environmental Benefit of Water Quality Improvement in Lake Paldang with Contingent Valuation Method, J. Korea Planners Association, 32, pp.195-208.
|
7 |
Yoo, S.H. (2003) Analysis of Double-bounded Dichotomous Choice Format of the Contingent Valuation Method Using Sample Selection Model, Review of Fiscal Studies, 10, pp.47-80.
|
8 |
Yoo, S.H., Shin, C.O. and Yang, C.Y. (2006) Household's Willingness to Pay for Piped Water Quality Improvement in Wonju, J. Environmental Policy, 5, pp.9-103.
|
9 |
Kim, Y.J. and Yoo, Y.S. (2005) Valuing Nonmarket Benefits of Water Quality Improvements in Paldang Reservoir and Han River: a Choice Experiments Study, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 14. pp.337-379.
|
10 |
Leon, C. (1996) Double Bounded Survival Values for Preserving the Landscape of Natural Parks, Journal of Environmental Management, 46, pp.103-118.
DOI
|
11 |
Mitche ll, R.C. and Carson, R.T. (1989) Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. RFF Press.
|
12 |
Kim, J .H. (2001) Benefit Estimation of Tap Water Quality Improvement Based on Citizens' Willingness-To-Pay, Korean Public Administration Review, 10, pp.245-262.
|
13 |
K-Wat er(Korea Water Resources Corporation). (2007) 21st Century Frontier R&D Program for Securing Sustainable Water Resources: Building the System for Water Resources & Technology Valuation, Ministry of Science and Technology.
|
14 |
Kwak, S.J. (1994) Contingent Valuation of Improving Safety of Tap Water Quality in Seoul, The Korea Spatial Planning Review, 21, pp.23-40.
|
15 |
Lee, J. S., Yoo, S.H. and Kwak, S.J. (2007) Measuring the Economic Benefits of Water Quality Improvement of Nakdong River- Using One-half Bound Dichotomous Choice Model, Economic Research, 25, pp.111-129.
|
16 |
Cho, H.J., Lee, B.N. and Kim, J.S. (1998) Assessing the Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Using Contingent Valuation Method: Case Study of the Kumgang Area, Industrial Engineering, 11, pp.209-218.
|
17 |
Cho, Y., Kim, B.K. and Kwak, J.E. (2001) Estimation of WTP for Water Quality Improvements in Paldang Reservoir Using Contingent Valuation, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 10, pp.433-459.
|
18 |
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney P.R., Leamer, E.E., Rader, R. and Schuman, H. (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, Federal Register, 58, pp.4601-4614.
|
19 |
Cameron, T.A. and Quiggin, J. (1994) Estimation Using Contingent Valuation Data from a Dichotomous Choice with Follow-up Questionnaire", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27, pp.218-34.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Alberini, A. (1995) Efficiency vs Bias of Willingness-to-Pay Estimates: Bivariate and Interval-Data Models, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, pp.169-180.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Desvousges, W.H., Smith, V.K. and Fisher, A. (1987) Option Price Estimates for Water Quality Improvements: A Contingent Valuation Study for the Monongahela River, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, pp.248-267.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Eom, Y .S. (2000) Valuing Drinking Water Risk Reductions Using Experimental Market Method, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 9, pp.747-771.
|
23 |
Eom, Y.S. (2001) Empirical Evidence on Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation of Water Quality Improvements in Man Kyoung River, Environmental and Resource Economics Review, 10, pp.387-412.
|
24 |
Hanemann, W. (1984) Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, pp.332-341.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Hanem ann, W.M., Loomis, J.B. and Kaninnen, B.J. (1991) Statistical Efficiency of Double Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, pp.1255-1263.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Yoo, S.H. and Hong, P. (2007) Using a Model of Correcting Missing Response Observation to Measure the Economic Benefits of the Tap Water Quality Improvements in Seoul, Seoul City Research, 8, pp.1-54.
|
27 |
Houtven, G.V., Powers, J. and Pattanayak, S.K. (2007) Valuing Water Quality Improvements in the United States Using Meta-Analysis: Is the Glass Half-full or Half-empty for National Policy Analysis?, Resource and Energy Economics, 29, pp.206-228.
DOI
|
28 |
Jeffrey L.J. and Abdelmoneim, H.E. (1993) Willingness to Pay for Improvements in Drinking Water Quality, Water Resource Research, 29, pp.237-245.
DOI
|
29 |
Ahn, S.Y. and Kwon, H.T. (2009) Research Papers: Application of Contingent Valuation Method for Benefit Evaluation on Improving the Quality of Water, KSWST J. Water Treatment, 17, pp.171-192.
|