Browse > Article

Effect of Shape and Flow Rate on T10 in Clearwell  

Shin, Eun-Her (KAIST 건설 및 환경공학과)
Kim, Sung-Hoon (KAIST 건설 및 환경공학과)
Park, Hee-Kyung (KAIST 건설 및 환경공학과)
Ahn, Jae-Chan (서울시 상수도연구소)
Choi, Jae-Ho (서울시 상수도연구소)
Choi, Young-June (서울시 상수도연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society of Water and Wastewater / v.19, no.6, 2005 , pp. 819-826 More about this Journal
Abstract
To guarantee the disinfection ability in clearwell, a value of CT is considered where C[mg/l] is disinfectant residual at the exit of clearwell and T[min] means $T_{10}$, the contact time when 10% of tracer is out of clearwell after introducing the tracer at the inlet. To meet a CT value required, increasing the C value is not recommended because high C value can increase potential of producing disinfection by product like THMs. Increasing the hydraulic efficiency surrogated by $T_{10}$ is thus an option widely recommended. Right now, it is widely adopted estimating $T_{10}$ considering LW ratio only due to the suggestions of previous researches. The authors think however there are other factors to consider including shape, flow rate, configuration of inlet and outlet, and the existence of intra basin. This study is initiated to closely look at the effects of two factor on hydraulic efficiency. The factors are shape and inlet flow velocity, i.e., inflow. For that, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model is developed and pilot test is also carried out. The results show that at a L/W ratio, disinfection ability is overestimated with larger length in shape and higher inlet flow velocity. This suggests that in determining $T_{10}$, the shapes of clearwell and inlet flow velocity should also be considered as well as L/W ratio.
Keywords
CFD model; hydraulic efficiency in clearwell; LW ratio; shape factor; flow rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bishop Mark M., J Mark Morgan, Brendon Cornwell, and Donald K. Jamison (1993) Improving the Disinfection Time of Water Plant Clearwell. Jour. AWWA, 85(3), pp. 68-75
2 Walter M. Grayman, Rolf A. Deininger, Adam Green, Paul F. Boulos, Robert W. Bowcock, and chris C. Godwin(1996) Water quality and mixing models for tanks and reservoirs, Jour. AWWA, 88(7), pp. 60-73
3 USEPA (1989) GuidanceManual for Compliance with the Filtration and Disinfection Requirements for Public Water Systems Using Surface Water Sources, Denver, Co: AWWA
4 Henry D.J., and E.M. Freeman (1995) Finite Element Analysis and $T_{10}$ Optimization of Ozone Contactors, Ozone Science and Engineering, 17, pp. 587-606   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mark M. Clark, Joel Ducoste, and Catherine Burns (1999) Improving Clearwell Design for CT Compliance. AWWARF and AWWA
6 Hart, Frederick L., Richard Allen, and Joseph Di Alesio (1975), Modifications Improve Chlorine Contact Chamber Performance, Water & Sewage Works, pp. 88-90
7 Imad A. Hannoun, Faul Boulos (1997), Optimizing distribution storage water quality: A hydrodynamic approach, Appl. Math Modelling, 21, pp. 495-502   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Imad A. Hannoun, Paul F. Boulos, and John List (1998), Using hydraulic modeling to optimize contact time, Jour. AWWA, 90(8),77-87
9 David J. Opferman, Steven G. Buchberger, and D.John Arduini (1995) Complying with the SWTR: Ohio's experience, Jour. AWWA, 87(2), pp. 53-67
10 Buchberger, Steven G. and Lin (1995), Model for instantaneous Residential Warer Demands, Jour. of Hydraulic Engineering, 121(3), pp. 232-246   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Susan M. Teefy and Philip C. Singer (1990) Performance and Analysis of Tracer Tests to Determin Compliance of a Disinfection Scheme with the SWTR, Jour AWWA, 82(12), pp. 88-98
12 Charles N. Haas, Josh Joffe, Uma Anmangandla, Joseph G. Jacangelo, and Mark Heath(1996) Water quality and disinfection kinetics, Jour. AWWA, 88(3), pp. 95-103
13 Hong Wang and Roger A. Falconer (1998) Simulating Disinfection Processes in Chlorine Contact Tanks Using Various Turbulence Model and High-Order Accurate Difference Schemes. Wat. Res., 32(5), pp. 1529-1543   DOI   ScienceOn