Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2019.20.10.179

A Study on Selection of R&D Supervision Institution of Weapon Systems Using Delphi and AHP  

Kim, Jin-Hyeon (Directorate of Technology Planning, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Lee, Ho-Jin (Directorate of Technology Planning, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.20, no.10, 2019 , pp. 179-186 More about this Journal
Abstract
Based on the characteristics of the weapon system, a government-funded research institute or a defense industry company is selected as the R&D supervision institution. On the other hand, research for the selection of a R&D supervision institution has not been conducted actively. This paper proposes a methodology for selecting R&D supervision institutions, such as procedure and indices. First, candidates of the index were obtained using data investigation and consulting, and five indices were deduced using Delphi. The weight of the indices was set using AHP. The high element consisted of 'Technical elements' and 'Business element'. The low element of 'Technical elements' consisted of 'Possession and readiness of critical technology' and 'Experience of similar R&D'. The low element of 'Business element' consisted of 'Base circumstance of the project', 'Risk management', and 'Will for the project'. The total weights of the indices were 'Possession and readiness of critical technology' 0.405, 'Experience of similar R&D' 0.297, 'Base circumstance of the project' 0.124, 'Risk management' 0.127, and 'Will for the project' 0.047. The indices were applied to the 00 weapon system and the result was deduced.
Keywords
Delphi; AHP; Weapon; R&D Supervision Institution; Defense;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Defense Science and Technology Glossary[Internet], Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, c2013 [cited 2013 December 16], Available From : http://dtims.dtaq.re.kr:8070/search/main/index.do (accessed Aug. 21, 2019)
2 Defense Acquisition Management Regulation, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Korea, 2019.
3 M. C. Seong, 18-22 Defense Industry Development Master Plan, Policy Report, Defense Acquisition Program Administration, Korea, pp.38-74.
4 K. W. Park, K. Y. Lee, C. H. Kim, S. Y. Choi, "A study on knowledge-based alternatives analysis model(KAAM) for the best decision making in weapon systems acquisition", Journal of the Military Operations Research Society Of Korea, Vol.33, No.1, pp.1-18, June. 2007.
5 G. A. Wilson, H. Buller, "The use of socio- economic and environmental indicators in assessing the effectiveness of EU agri-environmental policy", European Environment, Vol.11, No.6, pp.297-313, Nov. 2001. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eet.273   DOI
6 S. Park, Y. W. Hong, J. K. Na, "A method for selecting the evaluating index of defense R&D project by AHP", Journal of Korean Data & Information Science Society, Vol.23, No.5, pp.961-970, 2012. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2012.23.5.961   DOI
7 C. H. Lawshe, "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, Vol.28, No.4, pp.563-575, 1975. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x   DOI
8 C. H. Lee, "Group Decision Theory", Sejong Publishers, p.312, 2010
9 2013 Defense Acquisitions Assessments of Selected Weapon Programs, Report to Congressional Committees, Government Accountability Office, USA, p.132.