Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.4.8

Advanced Intensity Measures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model of Nonstructural Components Considering the Effects of Earthquake  

Hur, Ji-eun (Korea Research Institute of Smart Material & Structures System)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.18, no.4, 2017 , pp. 8-14 More about this Journal
Abstract
Nonstructural components, such as electrical equipment, have critical roles in the proper functionality of various infrastructure systems. Some of these devices in certain facilities should operate even under strong seismic shaking. However, it is challenging to define each mechanical and operational failure and determine system failure probabilities under seismic shaking due to the uncertainties in earthquake excitations and the diversity of electrical equipment, among other factors. Therefore, it is necessary to develop effective and practical probabilistic models for performance assessment of electrical equipment considering variations in equipment features and earthquakes. This study will enhance the understanding of the effect of rocking behavior on nonstructural equipment, and linear-to-nonlinear behavior of restrainers. In addition, this study will generate probabilistic seismic demand models of rigid equipment for a set of conventional and novel intensity measures.
Keywords
Intensity Measures; Latin Hypercube Sampling; Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses; Nonstructural Components; Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Makris, N., Zhang, J., Rocking Response of Anchored Blocks Under Pulse-Type Motions. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, vol. 127, no. 5, pp. 484-493, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:5(484)   DOI
2 Gupta A., Rustogi S. K., Gupta A. K., Ritz vector approach for evaluating in cabinet response spectra. Nuclear engineering and design, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 255-272, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(99)00076-X   DOI
3 Yang J., Rustogi S. K., Gupta A., Rocking stiffness of mounting arrangements in electrical cabinets and control panels. Nuclear engineering and design, vol. 219, no. 2, pp. 127-141, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(02)00279-0   DOI
4 Hur J., Seismic performance evaluation of switchboard cabinets using nonlinear numerical models. Chapters4-6, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2012.
5 Hur J., Shafieezadeh A., Characterization of Main-Shock Effects on the Aftershock Fragility of Rigid Electrical Equipment. Safety, Reliability, Risk and Life-Cycle Performance of Structures and Infrastructures. pp. 4415 -4421, 2013.
6 Baker, J. W., Lin, T., Shahi, S. K.,, Jayaram, N., New Ground Motion Selection Procedures and Selected Motions for the PEER Transportation Research Program. PEER Technical Report 2011/03, 2011.
7 Cornell C. A. Jalayer F., Hamburger R. O., Foutch D. A., Probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 526-533, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)   DOI
8 Bandypadhyay K. K., Hofnayer C. H., Kassir M. K., Pepper S. E., Seismic Fragility of Nuclear Power Plant Components [PHASE II]," NUREG/CR-4659, BNL-NUREG-52007, 2, Department of Nuclear Energy, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Long Island, 1987.
9 Shampine L. F., Reichelt M. W., The Matlab ODE Suite. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/S1064827594276424   DOI
10 Shenton, H. W., Criteria for initiation of slide, rock, and slide rock rigid body modes. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 690-693, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1996)122:7(690)   DOI
11 Makris, N., Zhang, J. Rocking Response and Overturning of Anchored Equipment under Seismic Excitations. PEER Report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley NUREG -U.S, 1999.
12 Taniguchi, T., Non-linear response analyses of rectangular rigid bodies subjected to horizontal and vertical ground motion. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 1481-1500, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.170   DOI
13 Yim A. C., Chopra A., Simplified earthquake analysis of multistory structures with foundation uplift. Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 111, no. 12, pp. 2708-2731, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:12(2708)   DOI