Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.3.381

A Study on the Development of a Measuring Instrument for Korean Nursing Student' Evaluation of the Effect of Simulation Education.  

Nam, Ho-Hee (Department of Nursing, Masan University)
Song, Hyun-Young (Department of Nursing, Gumi University)
Lee, Bo-Ram (Department of Nursing, Semyung University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.18, no.3, 2017 , pp. 381-390 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study is to develop a teamwork self-assessment tool for Korean nursing students (K-self assessment of teamwork) to evaluate the effects of simulation education, and to test the validity of the tool. As the research method, data were collected from 185 third- and fourth-year nursing students who had completed emergency simulation practice courses while attending nursing schools at two universities in K region. The collected data were analyzed using such statistical programs as SPSS/WIN 22.0 and AMOS 17.0. A test of the construct validity was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis and explanatory factor analysis. To test the criterion validity of the K-self assessment of teamwork, its correlation with the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficients. In addition, of the reliability items, the internal consistency was tested using Chronbach's ${\alpha}$. The results of the study are as follows: The construct validity was demonstrated through the confirmatory factor analysis and explanatory factor analysis. As regards the test of reliability, there was one item for which the reliability of its validity was increased to .937 when a (single/particular) question was removed. However, in the end, no questions were removed, because the correlation coefficient between the questions and the total score was greater than .4. The overall reliability of the K-self assessment tool of teamwork was found to be .934, confirming its reliability. The translated version of the K-self assessment of teamwork developed in this study was also demonstrated to be applicable to domestic settings, in which the teamwork of nursing students can be assessed during simulation education. The results of the use of this tool in the future will be used to assess the effects of simulation education at nursing colleges, and will become the basis of various types of educational programs aimed at improving teamwork in emergency situations.
Keywords
Development of a Measuring Instrument; Evaluation of the Effect; Nursing Student; Simulation Education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 P. M. Bentler. Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), pp. 238-246, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238   DOI
2 J. Weller, B. Shulruf, J. Torrie, R. Frengley, M. Boyd, A. Paul, B. Yee, P. Dzendrowskl. Validation of a measurement tool for self-assessment of teamwork in intensive care. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 111(3), pp. 460-467, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aet060   DOI
3 H. E. Tinsley, D. J. Tinsley. Uses of factor analysis in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, pp. 414-424, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.414   DOI
4 J. F. Malec, L. C. Torsher, W. F. Dunn, D. A. Wiegmann, J. J. Arnold, D. A. Brown, V. Phatak. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale: Reliability and validity for evaluation key crew resource management skills. Simulation in Healthcare, 2, pp. 4-10, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e31802b68ee   DOI
5 M. R. Lynn, Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), pp. 382-385, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
6 JC Nunnally, IH Bernstein. Psychometric theory(3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
7 J. F. Hair, R. L. Tatham, R. E Anderson, W Black. .Multivariatedata analysis (5th ed.) NewJersey: PrenticeHall INC, 1998.
8 J. H. Steiger. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180, 1990. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4   DOI
9 J. Tak, Psychological testing, 2nd ed. Seoul: Hakjisa Corp.; 2007.
10 MA Pett, NR Lackey, JJ Sullivan., Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in healthcare research, California: Sage, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984898
11 S. M. Jahng. Best practices in Exploratory Factor analysis for the Development of the Likert-type Scale, Korean Psychological Association, 34(4), 1079-1100, 2015.
12 Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education. Specify the colleges four-year term of study screening. Retrieved January 20, 2014, from Korean Accreditation Board of Nursing Education Web site: http://kabon.or.kr/kabon02/index04.php
13 H. R. Kim, E. Y. Choi, H. Y. Kang, S. M. Kim. The Relationship among learning satisfaction, learning attitude, self-efficacy and the nursing students' academic achievement after simulation-based education on emergency nursing care. The Journal of Korean academy Society of Nursing Education, 17(1), pp. 5-13, 2011.   DOI
14 C. A. Blum, S. Borglund, D. Parcells. High fidelity nursing simulation: Impact on student self-confidence and clinical competence. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 7 (1), pp. 1-14, 2010. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X.2035   DOI
15 A. J. Bland, A. Topping, B. A. Wood. A. Concept analysis of simulation as a learning strategy in the education of undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 31, pp. 664-670, 2011. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2010.10.013   DOI
16 J. H. Lee, M. Choi. Evaluation of effects of a clinical reasoning course among undergraduate nursing students. Journal of Korean Academy of Adult Nursing, 23, pp. 1-9, 2011. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2011.23.1.01
17 L. Cronenwett, G. Sherwood, J. Barnsteiner, J. Disch, J. Johnson, P. Mitchell, D. T. Sullivan, J. Warren. Quality and safety education for nurses. Nursing Outlook, 55(3), pp. 122-131, 2007. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2007.02.006   DOI
18 L. T. Gantt. Using the clark simulation evaluation rubric with associate degree and baccalaureate nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 31(2), 101-105, 2010.
19 S. E. Kardong-Edgren, A. R. Starkweather, L. D. Ward. The integration of simulation into a clinical foundations of nursing course: Student and faculty perspectives. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 5(1), 1-16, 2008. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2202/1548-923X1603
20 H. R. Kim, E. Y. Choi, H. Y. Kang. Simulation Module development and team competency evaluation. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamental of Nursing, 18, pp. 392-400, 2011.
21 S. M. Lee. Relationships of nurses' teamwork skills to team effectiveness in nursing units. Unpublished master's thesis, Catholic university of Pusan, 2013.
22 DW Johoson, R Johnson, E Holubec. Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom (5th ed.), Edina, Mn: Interaction Book Company. 2002.
23 K. C. Li., Directions of simulation-based learning in of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 17, pp. 246-256, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5977/JKASNE.2011.17.2.246   DOI
24 R. L. Helmreich, J. A. Wilhelm, J. R. Klinect, A. C. Merritt . Culture, error, and crew resource management. In: Salas E, Bowers CA, Edens E, eds. Improving teamwork in organizations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. 305-331, 2001.
25 E. E. Suh. Development of a conceptual framework for nursing simulation education utilizing human patient simulators and standardized patients. Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 18, pp. 206-219, 2012. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2012.18.2.206   DOI
26 J. E. Ware, K. K Snow, M. Kosinski, B Gandek,. SF-36 health survey: mannual and institute, Bosten, The Health Institute, New Englnad, Medical Center, 1993.
27 K. S. No. Statistical analysis of thesis writing writing properly. Seoul: Hanbit academy, 2015.
28 RF DeVellis. Scale Development: Theory and Applications (3rd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2012.
29 B. M. Byme. Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS :Basic Concepts, application, and programming Maywah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. 1998.
30 J. M. Werner, S. W. Lestter., Applying taem effectiveness framework to the performance of student case reams. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(4), 385-402, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1004   DOI
31 M. Hoegel, H. G. Gemuenden. Teamwor quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organizational Science, 12(4), 435-499, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635   DOI
32 L. R. Tucker, C. Lewis. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, pp. 1-10, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291170   DOI