Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.2.609

Improvement on performance management through quantitative evaluation method for technologies acquired from defense offset program  

Park, Tae-Woan (Offset Team, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Jung, Tae-Yun (Offset Team, Defense Agency for Technology and Quality)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.18, no.2, 2017 , pp. 609-618 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper presents the quantitative evaluation method for technologies acquired from the defense offset program. We firstly deduced the consideration in development by gathering the opinions of 128 experts by conducting a survey. Next, we made up an additional 49 experts for developing a performance management system of the offset program. The management system covered 4 technology fields which are defense R&D, depot maintenance, performance improvement, and manufacturing. The development procedure was composed of 4 parts: setting-up of work process, defining performance indicators, calculating weighted values of each indicator, and devising quantitative method. The results of this research could be used for enhancing the effectiveness of the offset program in 3 ways: establishing a systematic work process after acquisition of technology in offset program, establishing the positive feedback architecture by providing incentives to superior institute or company which is appointed through quantitative performance evaluating, and publicizing and promoting quantified outstanding performances for contributing to advance the offset program.
Keywords
AHP; Delphi; Offset Program; Performance Indicators; Performance Management; Quantitative;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "2007 Defense Science and Technology Survey", 2007.
2 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "2010 Defense Science and Technology Survey", 2010.
3 Defense Agency for Technology and Quality, "2013 Defense Science and Technology Survey", 2013.
4 Verzariu, Pompiliu. Countertrade, Barter, and Offsets: New Strategies for Profit in International Trade. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing, 1985.
5 Agency for Defense Development, "Offset history", 2010.
6 J. S. Lee, T. Y. Jung, B. Y. Han, "Development of Key Performance Index for Maximizing Offset Outcomes", Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 14.4, pp. 860-888, 2009.
7 M. Lee, B. Son, H. Lee, "Measuring R&D Effectiveness in Korean Companies', Research Technology Management, 1996.
8 M. Brown, R. Svenson, "Measuring R&D productivity", Research Technology Management, 1988.
9 J. Melkers, S. Cozzens, "Developing and Transferring Technology in State S&T Programs : Assessing Performance", Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 22, no. 2, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02509642
10 Jae-Wook Suk, "A Study on deducting evaluation items for rock cut slope using delphi survey", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 2828-2836, 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.4.2828   DOI
11 Jarir S. Dajani, Michael Z. Sincoff, Wayne K. Talley, "Stability and agreement criteria for the termination of Delphi studies", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 83-90, Jan.1979.   DOI