Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2017.18.10.531

A Case Study on the Change of Sampling inspection method for the Small Depth Charge Fuze  

Jee, Jae-Yong (Defense Agency for Technology Quality)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.18, no.10, 2017 , pp. 531-538 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the case of hydraulic pressure type fuse, we accept or reject certain product lots by considering the number of defective products in the operating pressure test. Generally, this procedure, known as 'The inspection by attributes', has been most commonly used in the field of quality assurance of products. However, the method of inspection by attributes suffers because it tests more samples than inspection by variables. Even though the quality of the products has remained stable in the process condition, the same number of samples is required for every lot, which wastes time and money. This paper suggests that the lot acceptance procedure is changed from inspection by attributes to inspection by variables. We can calculate the statistical tolerance percent of defectives and compare this to the Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) in order to save money and time. It is also easier to monitor and control the quality of products by using the process capability index and x-bar charts. In conclusion, the procedure delivers mutual benefit to both the customer and the producer by securing high quality products and reference data.
Keywords
Sampling-procedures; Small Depth Charge Fuze; Inspection by variables; Inspection by attributes; Acceptable Quality Level;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Product Introduction: Fuzes, http://www.poongsanfns.co.kr/customer/images/PoongsanFNScatalog(English).pdf
2 "Ammunition, standard quality assurance provisions, general specifications, FUZE, DEPTH CHARGE K751(KDS 1361-1003-4)", Agency for Defense Development, January, 4, 2013.
3 "Department of Defense Test Method Standard [Fuze and Fuze Compnents, Environmental and Performance Tests for](MIL-STD-331C)", U. S. Department of Defense, June, 22, 2009.
4 "Sampling Procedures for inspection by variable", KS Q 3951, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, 2013.
5 ISO 3951, Sampling- procedures and charts for inspection by variables for percent nonconforming, ISO, 1989.
6 "Sampling Procedures for inspection by attribues(Part 1 : Sampling schemes indexed by acceptance quality limi [AQL]for lot-by-lot inspection)", KS Q ISO 2859-1, Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, 2014.
7 Sampling Procedures Enhancement in Government Defense Quality Assurance Procedures, DTaQ-12-3492-R, 2012.
8 Taegyu Kim, Myeonghwan Na, Chunbeon Yu, Myung-Joo Lee, Yeongho Jeon, Soo-il Chung, "The latest SPC. SQC in accordance with international standards", Minyoungsa, 2012.
9 Kwang Ki Lee, et. al., "Robust Optimization of a Train Suspension by using Process Capability Index", p90-95, Journal of The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2009.
10 Statistical quality control, Korean Standards Association, 2005.
11 Statistical Engineering for Advanced Quality Lab, "eZ SPC 2.0", Hanyang University Industrial Engineering, 2007.
12 "Guidlines of Writing Content Discription for National Defense Standard", Defense Acquisition Program Administration, 2017.