Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2015.16.2.1073

A study on Influencing Factors of Knowledge Creation focus on Transactive Memory  

Liu, Chang (Dept. of Management Information Systems, Chungbuk National University)
Kim, Sang Wook (Dept. of Management Information Systems, Chungbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.16, no.2, 2015 , pp. 1073-1083 More about this Journal
Abstract
As an empirical study focused on how transactive memory concept influence the four processes of knowledge growth, this study aimed at explaining the function of transactive memory in the dynamic process of knowledge growth. To verify the research model, this study carried out a path analysis of 130 team memebers and as a result, part of the team transactive memory measurements does affect the knowledge growth. Consequentially, transactive memory especially based on team level, is relevant with knowledge growth. According to team level, this study targeted at the team members, and by adopting the team transactive memory concept in Cognitive Psycology, theoretically explained and analysed how to approach personal knowledge in internal organizations. To accelerate the knowledge process, the work should be modified collaboratively by trusting the team members' duty relations more than specialized knowledge. Furthermore, managers had better assign team members the work where they can make the most of their personal knowledge, and this study presented that the whole team performance could be improved by doing that.
Keywords
Meta-memory; SECI; Transactive Memory;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Davenport, T. H., De Long, D. W. & Beers, M. C, "Successful knowledge management projects," Sloan Management Review, pp.43-56, Winter, 1998.
2 Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension, London: Routledge & Kegan Paulublishers, 1966
3 Nonaka, I and Konno. N. The concept of "Ba": Building a foundation for Knowledge Creation. california management review, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp.40-54, 1998   DOI
4 Nonaka, I,. Toyama, R. & Konno, N. SECI, Ba and Leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, Long Range Planning, vol 33. pp.5-34, 2000 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(99)00115-6   DOI
5 Thompson, M. P. A., & Walsham, G, Placing knowledge management in context. Journal of Management Studies, 41, pp.725-747, 2004 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00451.x   DOI
6 Koenig, M, The third stage of KM emerges. KM World,11(3), http://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Editorial/Features/The-third-stage-of-KM-emerges-9327.aspx, 2002
7 Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T. & Hertel, P. T, Cognitive interdependence in close relationships, Compatible and Incompatible Relationships, Springer Series in Social Psychology, 42 Volumes. pp.253-276,1985
8 Wegner, D. M, Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. In B. Mullen and G.R. Goethals (eds.), Theories of Group Behavior. New York: Springer, pp.185-208, 1987 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4634-3_9
9 Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead. A. B, Transactive memory systems in organizations: Matching tasks, expertise, and people. Organ. Sci. 15 pp.633-644, 2004 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0069   DOI
10 Wegner, D. M, A computer network model of human transactive memory, Social Cognition 13 (3) pp.319-339, 1995 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.319   DOI
11 Lewis, K, Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. of Applied Psychology, 88, 4 pp.587-604, 2003   DOI
12 Liang, D. W., Moreland R. L & Argote, Founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective. role of transactive memory. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 21 pp.384-393, 1995 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167295214009   DOI
13 Moreland, R. L. & Myaskovsky. L, Exploring the performance benefits of group training: Transactive memory or improved communication? Organ. Behavior Group Decision Processes 82(1) pp.117-133, 2000 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2891   DOI
14 Akgun, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G.S., & Imamoglu, S. Z, Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42, 8, pp.1105-1120, 2005 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.01.001   DOI
15 Rulke, D. L., & Rau, D, Investigating the encoding process of transactive memory development in group training. Group & Organizations Management, 25, 4, pp.373-396, 2000 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601100254004   DOI
16 Moreland, R. L. & Argote, L, Transactive memory in dynamic organizations. In R.P.E. Mannix (ed.), Leading and Managing People in the Dynamic Organization. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.135-162, 2003
17 Hollingshead, A. B, Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 81 pp.1080-1089, 2001 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080   DOI
18 Jassawalla, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C, An examination of collaboration in high-technology: New product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), pp.237-254, 1998 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1530237   DOI
19 Yuan, Y. C., Fulk, J., & Monge, P. R, "Access to Information in Connective and Communal Transactive Memory Systems," Communication Research, Vol. 34, No. 2. pp.131-153, 2007 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298067   DOI
20 McEvily.B., Perrone, V. & Zaheer, A, Trust as an Organizing Principle, Organization science, January-February, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.91-103, 2003   DOI
21 Jones, G. R., George J M, The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork, Academy of management review, July 1, vol. 23 no. 3 pp.531-546, 1998
22 Jack S.S Hsu, Shih S. P. Jerry C. C. & Julie Liu Y. C, The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams' coordination, communication, and performance. International Journal of Project Management 30, pp.329-340, 2012 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.003   DOI
23 Yanfeng, Zheng, Unlocking founding team prior shared experience: A transactive memory system perspective, Journal of Business Venturing, 27, pp.577-591, 2012 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.001   DOI
24 Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S, Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: pp.242-266, 1998 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533225   DOI
25 Wood, R., & Bandura. A, Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56: pp.407-415, 1989 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.407   DOI
26 Dane, E., & Pratt. M. G, Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review 32 (1): pp.33-54, 2007 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.23463682   DOI
27 Wegner, D. M., Erber, R. & Raymond. P, Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61(6) pp.923-929, 1991 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923   DOI
28 Reagans, R. Argote, L. & Brooks, D, Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51, 6 pp.869-881, 2005   DOI
29 Moreland, R. L, Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. Small groups: Key readings, pp.327-346, 2006
30 Lewis, K, Knowledge and performance in knowledgeworker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50, 11, pp.1519-1533, 2004 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257   DOI