Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.7.4148

A Study on the Performance Measurement Method for National Research and Development Projects  

Yim, Sunjip (Division of Information Technology Management, Hanyang University)
Kim, Sungcheol (Samsung Advanced Institute of Technology)
Shin, Minsoo (School of Business, Hanyang University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.15, no.7, 2014 , pp. 4148-4156 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to suggest a national R&D performance measurement index from a new perspective. Government is trying to transit the R&D paradigm from 'catch-up' into 'lead- forward'. The problem of the existing performance evaluation was first identified, and the performance evaluation method of domestic & overseas research center & government was then reviewed. In particular, this study first referred to the creation & innovation indices, and focused on the national innovation and R&D ecosystem. Next, D'Aveni's Hypercompetition theory was applied to suggest a new performance measurement index, and AHP analysis interviewed from the domestic R&D performance evaluation experts was performed. This study contributes to the new national R&D performance index for the creative economy.
Keywords
AHP; Creation & Innovation index; Hypercompetition theory; Performance Measurement; Research and Development;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 H. Y. Lee & Y. T. Park, "An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach", Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 207-222. 2005.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
2 G. W. Lee, H. B. Kim, I. H. Jang, "Diagnosis of government R&D output management & utilization system and its implication focused on researcher's perception survey", KISTEP Issue Paper, 2012
3 J. Lane & S. Bertuzzi, "The STAR METRICS project: current and future uses for S&E workforce data", In Science of Science Measurement Workshop, held Washington DC. 2010. 12.
4 http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en
5 B. P. Cozzarin, "Data and the measurement of R&D program impacts", Evaluation and Program planning, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 284-298. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.03.004   DOI   ScienceOn
6 C. F. Chien, C. P. Chen & C. H. Chen, "Designing performance indices and a novel mechanism for evaluating government R&D projects", Journal of Quality, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 119. 2009.
7 L. Bornmann, "What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 64, No. 2, pp. 217-233. 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.22803   DOI   ScienceOn
8 K. Pho, B. Ang & F, Bai, "A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods", R&M Management Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 63-75, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00197   DOI   ScienceOn
9 M. E. Porter & S. Stern. "National innovative capacity", The global competitiveness report, pp. 102-118. 2002.
10 Y. M. Go, "Analysis of foreign creation index status and suggestion for developing domestic creation index", KISTEP Issue Paper, 2013.
11 R. Florida, The Rise of the Creative Class: And How it's transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life, New York: Perseus Book Group, 2002.
12 M. H. Lee, "Transition and task of the national innovation system for implementing creative economy", STEPI, 2013. 7.
13 R. Wiggins & T. W. Ruefli, "Schumpeter's ghost: is hypercompetition making the best of times shorter?", Strategic Managment Journal, Vol. 26, pp. 887-911, 2012.
14 National Science & Technology Council, National R&D output analysis and it's implication, 2009. 1.
15 National Science & Technology Council, The basic planning of the 2nd national R&D performance evaluation, 2011. 12.
16 R. D'Aveni, Hypercompetition: Managing the dynamics of strategic management, New York. 1994.
17 T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierachy Process, NY: Mcgraw-Hill, 1980.
18 Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Improvement of national R&D performance evaluation, 2013. 8
19 National Assembly Budget Office, Evaluation of national R&D project management, 2013. 7.
20 Korean Intellectual Property Office, Results of Government R&D patent performance in 2012, 2013.