Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2014.15.5.2806

The Effects of Abusive Supervision on Subordinates' Organizational Identification and Workplace Deviance Behavior: The Mediating Role of Job Satisfaction  

Lee, Jung-Hun (School of Business, SungKyunKwan University)
Moon, Jee-Young (Right management)
Heo, Il-Mu (School of Business, SungKyunKwan University)
Lee, Jong-Ho (Deloitte Anjin LLC)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.15, no.5, 2014 , pp. 2806-2820 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study investigated the mediating role that subordinates' job satisfaction might play in influencing the relationships between abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational identification and workplace deviance behavior(WDB-O). With data gathered from employees(N=281) representing a wide array of organizations, structural equation modeling was used to test hypotheses. The results showed that abusive supervision is negatively related to job satisfaction and consequently organizational identification, positively associated with organizational deviance behavior through job satisfaction indirectly and has a direct effect on WDB-O.
Keywords
Abusive Supervision; Job satisfaction; Organizational Identification; Workplace Deviance Behavior(WDB-O);
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 R. van Dick. My job is my castle: Identification in organizational contexts, In C. L. Cooper, & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 171-203), Chichester, Wiley, 2004.
2 S. Robinson, & R. Bennett. A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multi-dimensional scaling study, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555-572, 1995. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256693   DOI
3 P. V. Lewis. Defining "business ethics": Like nailing jello to a wall, Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 377-383, 1985. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02388590   DOI
4 D. W. Organ. Organizational citizenship behavior: it's construct clean-up time, Human Performance, 10, 85-97, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2   DOI   ScienceOn
5 P. D. Dunlop, & K. Lee. Workplace deviance, organizational citizenship behavior, and business unit performance: The bad apples do spoil the whole barrel, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 67-80, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.243   DOI
6 C. A. Henle. Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality, Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 247-263, 2005.
7 M. L. Ambrose, M. A. Seabright, & M. Schminke. Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational justice, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947-965, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00037-7   DOI
8 L. Keashly, V. Trott, & L. M. MacLean. Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation, Violence and Victims, 9, 341-357, 1994.
9 F. A. Mael, & B. E. Ashforth. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202   DOI   ScienceOn
10 M. Mount, R. Ilies, & E. Johnson. Relationship of personality traits and counterproductive work behaviors: The mediating effects of job satisfaction, Personnel Psychology, 59, 591-622, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2006.00048.x   DOI   ScienceOn
11 L. M. Saari, & T. A. Judge. Employee attitudes and job satisfaction, Human Resource Management, 43, 395-407, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20032   DOI
12 C. L. Wilkin. I can't get no job satisfaction: Meta-analysis comparing permanent and contingent workers, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 47-64, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.1790   DOI
13 B. E. Ashforth, & F. A. Mael. Social identity and the organization, Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39, 1989. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/258189   DOI   ScienceOn
14 M. A. Hogg, & D. Abrams. Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes, London: Routledge, 1988.
15 M. Riketta. Organizational identification: A meta-analysis, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66, 358-384, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.05.005   DOI   ScienceOn
16 J. P. Meyer, D. J. Stanley, L. Herscovitch, & L. Topolnytsky. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842   DOI   ScienceOn
17 M. S. Mitchell, & M. L. Ambrose. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159-1168. 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1159   DOI
18 D. van Knippenberg, & E. Sleebos. Organizational identification versus organizational commitment: Self-definition, social exchange, and job attitudes, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 571-584, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.359   DOI
19 T. R. Tyler, & S. L. Blader. Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement, Philadelphia, Psychology Press, 2000.
20 A. Smidts, A. T. H. Pruyn, & C. B. M. van Riel. The impact of employee communication and perceived external prestige on organizational identification, Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1051-1062, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069448   DOI   ScienceOn
21 K. J. Zellars, B. J. Tepper, & M. K. Duffy. Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1068-1076, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1068   DOI
22 B. J. Tepper, S. E. Moss, D. E. Lockhart, & J. C. Carr. Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates' psychological distress, Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1169-1180, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20159918   DOI   ScienceOn
23 J. R. Detert, L. K. Trevino, E. R. Burris, & M. Andiappan. Managerial modes of influence and counter productivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993-1005, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.993   DOI
24 A. H. Eagley, & S. Chaiken. The psychology of attitudes, Fort Worth, TX: HarcourHall, 1993.
25 L. D. Restubog, K. L. Scott, & T. J. Zagenczyk. When distress hits home: The role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees' responses to abusive supervision, Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 713-729, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021593   DOI
26 E. A. Locke. What is job satisfaction?, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336, 1969. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(69)90013-0   DOI
27 E. A. Locke. The nature and causes of job satisfaction, In Dunnette, M. D. (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1297-1343. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1976.
28 R. H. Moorman. The influence of cognitive and affective based job satisfaction measures on the relationship between satisfaction and organizational citizenship behavior, Human Relations, 6, 759-776, 1993. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600604   DOI
29 R. Ilies, & T. A. Judge. Understanding the dynamic relationships among personality, mood, and job satisfaction: A field experience sampling study, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 1119-1139, 2002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00018-3   DOI
30 T. A. Judge, & R. Ilies. Affect and job satisfaction: A study of their relationship at work and at home, Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 661-673, 2004. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.661   DOI
31 J. M. Hoobler, & D. J. Brass. Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression, Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1125-1133, 2006. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1125   DOI
32 S. Aryee, Z. X. Chen, L. Sun, & Y. A. Debrah. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: Test of a trickle-down model, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 191-201, 2007. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.191   DOI   ScienceOn
33 B. J. Tepper, M. K. Duffy, & J. D. Shaw. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates' resistance, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974-983, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.974   DOI
34 L. J. Williams, & J. T. Hazer. Antecedents and consequences of satisfaction and commitment in turnover models: A reanalysis using latent variable structural equation methods, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 219-231, 1986. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.219   DOI
35 R. S. Dalal. A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 1241-1255, 2005. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1241   DOI   ScienceOn
36 A. Marcus-Newhall, W. C. Pedersen, M. Carlson, & N. Miller. Displaced aggression is alive and well: A meta-analytic review, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 670-689, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.4.670   DOI
37 J. P. Burton, J. M, Hoobler, & M. L. Scheuer. Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise, Journal of Business Psychology, 27, 271-279, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9255-0   DOI
38 B. J. Tepper, S. E. Moss, & M. K. Duffy. Predictors of abusive supervision: Supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance, Academy of Management Journal, 54, 279-294, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.60263085   DOI   ScienceOn
39 E. Xu, X. Huang, C. K. Lam, & Q. Miao. Abusive supervision and work behavior: The mediating role of LMX, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 531-543, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.768   DOI
40 M. K. Shoss, R. Eisenberger, S. L. Restubog, & T. J. Zagenczyk. Blaming the Organization for Abusive Supervision: The Roles of Perceived Organizational Support and Supervisor's Organizational Embodiment, Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 158-168, 2013. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030687   DOI
41 G. Yukl. Leadership in organizations, 3rd ed., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1994.
42 B. M. Bass, & B. J. Avolio. Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
43 B. J. Tepper. Consequences of abusive supervision, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556375   DOI   ScienceOn
44 G. R. de Moura, D. Abrams, C. Retter, S. Gunnarsdottir, & K. Ando. Identification as an organizational anchor: How identification and job satisfaction combine to predict turnover intention, European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 540-557, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.553   DOI
45 P. M. Blau. Exchange and power in social life, New York, Wiley, 1965.
46 B. Tepper, & E. Taylor. Relationships among supervisors' and subordinates' procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors, Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97-105, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/30040679   DOI
47 S. J. Wayne, L. M. Shore, & R. C. Liden. Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective, Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/257021   DOI   ScienceOn
48 L. D. Molm, G. Peterson, & N. Takahashi. The value of exchange, Social Forces, 80, 159-185, 2001. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2001.0081   DOI   ScienceOn
49 S. Hong, M. L. Malik, & M. K. Lee. Testing configural, metric, scalar, and latent mean invariance across genders in sociotropy and autonomy using non-western sample, Educational and Psychology Measurement, 63, 636-654, 2003. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164403251332   DOI   ScienceOn
50 T. A. Judge, E. A. Locke, C. C. Durbam, & A. N. Kluger. Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 17-34, 1998. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.17   DOI
51 J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson & R. L. Tathanm. Multivariate data analysis, 6th ed., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2006.
52 J. H. Steiger. Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180, 1990. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4   DOI
53 P. M. Podsakoff & D. W. Organ. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and Prospects, Journal of Management, 12, 531-326, 1986. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408   DOI
54 S. Tangirala, & R. Ramanujam. Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification, Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189-1203, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732719   DOI   ScienceOn
55 F. A. Mael, & B. E. Ashforth. Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103-123, 1992. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202   DOI   ScienceOn
56 L. Morris, L. G. Hulbert, & D. Abrams. An experimental investigation of group members' perceived influence over leader decisions, Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 57-167, 2000. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.4.2.157   DOI