1 |
Ban, J, C, Kim, S (2012). A Comparison of Skill Mastery Estimation Methods for DINA and Changes of Skill Masteries of Elementary Students. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(4), 721-744.
|
2 |
Cheng, Y. (2009). When cognitive diagnosis meets computerized adaptive testing: CD-CAT. Psychometrika, 74(4), 619-632. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9123-2
DOI
|
3 |
Chiu, C. Y., Douglas, J. A., & Li, X. (2009). Cluster analysis for cognitive diagnosis: Theory and applications. Psychometrika, 74(4), 633-665. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9125-0
DOI
|
4 |
Cui, Y., Gierl, M. J., & Chang, H. H. (2012). Estimating classification consistency and accuracy for cognitive diagnostic assessment. Journal of Educational Measurement, 49(1), 19-38. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2011.00158.x
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
de la Torre, J. (2008). An empirically-based method of Q-matrix validation for the DINA model: Development and applications. Journal of Educational Measurement, 45(4), 343-363. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2008.00069.x
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
de la Torre, J. (2009). DINA model and parameter estimation: A didactic. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 34(1), 115-130. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1076998607309474
DOI
|
7 |
de la Torre, J. (2011). The generalized DINA model framework. Psychometrika, 76(2), 179-199. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11336-011-9207-7
DOI
|
8 |
de la Torre, J., & Douglas, J. A. (2004). Higher-order latent trait models for cognitive diagnosis. Psychometrika, 69(3), 333-353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02295640
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
de la Torre, J., Hong, Y., & Deng, W. (2010). Factors affecting the item parameter estimation and classification accuracy of the DINA model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(2), 227-249. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.2010.00110.x
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
DiBello, L. V., Stout, W. F., & Roussos, L. A. (1995). Unified cognitive psychometric diagnostic assessment likelihood-based classification techniques. In P. D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively Diagnostic Assessment(pp. 361-390). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
11 |
Fu, J., & Li, Y. (2007, April). An integrative review of cognitively diagnostic psychometric models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Chicago, IL.
|
12 |
Hartz, S. (2002). A Bayesian framework for the Unified Model for assessing cognitive abilities: Blending theory with practice. Doctoral thesis, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
|
13 |
Henson, R. A., & Templin, J. L. (2009, April). Q-matrix construction. Paper presented at 2009 NCME training session. San Francisco, CA.
|
14 |
Huebner, A., & Wang, B. (2011). A note on comparing examinee classification methods for cognitive diagnosis models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(2), 407-419. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164410388832
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Junker, B. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2001). Cognitive assessment models with few assumptions and connections with nonparametric item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 25(3), 258-272. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01466210122032064
DOI
|
16 |
Kim, S, E, Park, Y, S, & Lee, Y, S (2012). Application of Latent Class Model to Multiple Strategy CDM Analysis. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(1), 49-68.
|
17 |
Kang, T, H, Park, C, H, & Kim, I, S (2011) The effects of test length and performance-level number on classification consistency and accuracy. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(4), 1017-1038.
|
18 |
Kim, H, K, Han, J, A, Choi, S, G, Kim, B, M (2012). The Application of Cognitive Diagnostic Model for Achievement Profile Analysis and Score Report(RRE 2012-7). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
|
19 |
Kim, S, H, Kim, S, J, &, Song, M, Y (2008). Using Cognitive Diagnosis Theory to Analyze the Test Results of Mathematics. Journal of Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics School Mathematics. 10(2), 259-277.
과학기술학회마을
|
20 |
Kim, S, H, Song, M, Y (2011). Diagnosis of knowledge states using large scale assessments: An application of DINA model. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 14(1), 177-200.
|
21 |
Kunina, O., Rupp, A. A., & Wilhelm, O. (2008, June 29-July 2). Convergence of skill profiles for cognitive diagnosis models and other multidimensional scaling approaches: An empirical illustration with a diagnostic mathematics assessment. Paper presented at the annual international Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Druham, NH.
|
22 |
Lee, J, S (2009). Present Educational evaluation. Seoul: Kyoyookgwahaksa.
|
23 |
Lee, Y, S, Park, Y, S, Song, M, Y, Kim, S, E, Lee, Y, J, In, B, R (2012). Investigating Score Reporting of Attribute Profiles from the National Assessment of Educational Achievement using Cognitive Diagnostic Models. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 25(3), 411-433.
|
24 |
R Development Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org.
|
25 |
Tatsuoka, K. K. (1983). Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(4), 435-354. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00212.x
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Rupp, A. A., & Templin, J. L. (2008a). The effects of Q-matrix misspecification on parameter estimates and classification accuracy in the DINA model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 78-96. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164407301545
DOI
|
27 |
Rupp, A. A., Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2010). Diagnostic measurement: Theory, methods, and application. NY: The Guilford press.
|
28 |
Song, M, Y, Lee, Y, S, & Park, Y, S (2011). Analysis and score reporting based on cognitive diagnostic models using the National Assessment of Educational Achievement(RRE 2011-8). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
|
29 |
Templin, J. L., & Henson, R. A. (2006). Measurement of psychological disorders using cognitive diagnosis models. Psychological Methods. 11(3), 287-305. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.3.287
DOI
ScienceOn
|