Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.8.3444

Legibility Evaluation of Two and Three Syllable Words Used in Pesticides According to Font, Thickness, Gender, and Visual Acuity  

Hwang, Hae-Young (Department of Visual Optics, Kyungwoon University)
Song, Young-Woong (Department of Occupational Health, Catholic University of Daegu)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.13, no.8, 2012 , pp. 3444-3451 More about this Journal
Abstract
Safety and health related information for the proper use and handing of pesticides is usually printed on the surface of the pesticide products in the form of texts. But, the guidelines or standards for the appropriate presentation of the texts for the pesticide products are most vague or not practical. Thus, this study aimed to provide the preliminary guidelines for the text sizes based on the legibility experiments. To achieve the objective legibility evaluation experiments were conducted to test the effects of different near vision (0.6, ${\geq}0.8$), gender, font type(thick gothic-type and fine gothic-type), thickness of font(plain and bold), and number of syllables(2 and 3 syllables) in the same age group of 20s. The results showed that legibility was different according to the visual acuity (p<0.05), and no other main effects showed statistically significant effects. The 'maximum illegible size' to read at least one word correctly in all the text conditions was 2 pt when the near vision was ${\geq}0.8$, and 2 pt or 3 pt when the near vision was 0.6. The 'minimum legible size' for 100% correct answer was 9 pt for the near vision of 0.6, and 5.3 pt for ${\geq}0.8$, respectively. Mean character size does not read any discomfort in 0.6 was 15.5 pt in both male and female but male was mean 8.5 pt, female was 10 pt in ${\geq}0.8$. Considering these experimental results, it was recommended that the 16 pt or larger characters should be used the important information such as 'Pesticides' or toxicity, and the minimum character size was 9 pt for the less important information.
Keywords
Legibility evaluation; Maximum illegible size; Minimum legible size; No discomfort size; Most discomfort size;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Y. W. Song, C. W. Lim, I. S. Lee, M. C. Jung, S .M. Mo, Y. K. Kong, "Effects of the Syllable Number, Font Type, Color Contrast, Display Type, Letter Size and Age Group on the Legibility of the Korean Characters", Journal of the KOSOS, Vol.24, No.5, pp.92-100, 2009.
2 J. C. Chung., "A study on the Readability of Hangul expressed on monitor", master thesis, Hansung University (1997).
3 W. S. Hwang, D. C. Lee, S. D. Lee, J. H. Lee, "Visual Performance on VDT Different Korean Letter Size and Font", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.16, No.2, pp.29-38, 1997.
4 S. J. Park, J. S. Lee, D. H. Kang, H. J. Lee, "Legibility evaluation for the letter size of an electronic product", Ergonomics Society of Korea conference, pp.360-369, 2007.
5 S. J. Lee, J. W. Kim, "An Experimental Study on the Impacts of Luminance Contrast Upon Readability in VDT Environments", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol.26, No.2 pp.21-33, 2007.   DOI
6 T. S. Tullis, J. L. Boynton, H. Hersh, "Readability of fonts in the windows environment", Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing System, pp.127-123, 1995.
7 A. I. Rudnicky, P. A. Kolers, "Size and case of type as stimuli in reading", Journal of Experimental Psychology in Human Perception and Performance, Vol.10, pp.231-249, 1984.   DOI
8 M. L. Bernard, B. S. Chaparro, M. M. Mills, Halcomb, "Examining children's reading performance and preference for different computer-displayed text", Behavior and Information Technology, Vol.21, No.2, pp.87-96, 2002.   DOI
9 I. Darroch, J. Goodman, S. Brewster, P. Gray, "The effect of age and font size on reading text on handheld computers", Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol.3585, pp.253-266, 2005.
10 US Department of Health and Human Services, Guidance for Industry: Labelling OTC Human Drug Products Questions and Answers, FDA, 2005.
11 Japanese Industrial Standard, Guidelines for the elderly and people with disabilities-Visual signs and displays- Estimation of minimum legible size for a Japanese single character, 2003.
12 European Commission, Guideline on the readability of the labelling and package leaflet of medicinal products for human use, 2009.
13 Song, Y. W., Lim, C. W., Choi, S. J., "Guidelines and Sample Investigation about the Texts and Icons used to deliver the Safety and Health Information in Pesticides", Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 12(3), 2010.   과학기술학회마을
14 C. W. Lim, K. C. Lim, H. Y. Hwang, S. J. Choi, Y. W. Song, "A Questionnaire Survey about the Degree of Understanding of the Safety and Health Information by Agricultural Workers", Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, Vol.12, pp.27-33, 2010.   과학기술학회마을
15 Statistics Korea, "2009 Survey Report of Agriculture", 2010.
16 W. J. Benjamin, "Borish's Clinical Refraction", 1st Ed. Saunders, pp.697, 1998.
17 Theodore Grosvenor FAAO. "Primary Care Optometry", 4th Ed. Butterworth-Heinemann, pp.469-480, 2001.
18 M. Mackeben, "Typefaces influence peripheral letter recognition and can be optimized for reading with eccentric viewing", Paper presented at the Vision 99, New York, NY, 1999.
19 C. W. Lim, H. Y. Hwang, Y. W. Song, "Legibility evaluation of the safety and health information used in pesticides", Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, Vol.13, No.3, pp.29-35, 2011.   과학기술학회마을
20 H. Akutsu, G. E. Legge, J. A. Ross, K. J. Schuebel, "Psychophysics of reading :X. Effects of age-related changes on vision", Journal of Psychological Science, Vol.46 No.6, pp.325-331, 1991.
21 J. S. Mansfield, G. E. Legge, M. C. Bane, "Psychophysics of reading Xv: Fonteffects in normal and low vision", Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Vol.37, No.8, pp.1492-1501, 1996.
22 S. Whittaker, F. Rohrkaste, K. E. Higgins, "Optimum letter spacing for word recognition in central and eccentric fields, Noninvasive assessment of the visual system". Technical digest series, 7, Washington, DC: Optical Society of America, 1989.
23 I. H. Shen, K. K. Shieh, C. Y. Chao, D. S. Lee, "Lighting, font style, and polarity on visual performance and visual fatigue with electronic paper displays", Displays, Vol.30, 2009.
24 N. C. Silver, C. C. Braun, "Perceived readability of warning labels with varied font sizes and styles", Safety Science, Vol.16, pp.615-625, 1993.   DOI