Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2012.13.5.2023

Effects of LT cooperative method on Underachiever's Academic Achievement and Learning Attitudes  

Lee, Jae-Cheol (Dept of Education, Korea National University Education)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.13, no.5, 2012 , pp. 2023-2029 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study were to identify the effect of Learning Together(LT) on underachiever's academic achievement and learning attitudes. To solve above study purpose, the subject of this study were 20 second-grade underachiever selected from two classes of middle school. The subject classified into two group. In this study, the experimental group were participated in LT method and comparison group were participated lecture-centered instruction. Experimental period were 8 weeks. After the experimental treatment, underachiever's academic achievement and learning attitudes carried out post-test. And the results of the data were analyzed by t-test and MANOVA. The results were as follows: A academic achievement and learning attitude of underachiever's through LT method was significantly higher than those learning through lecture-centered instruction. Especially, a self-confidence, success-expect, attention, affection as subordinate variables of learning attitude was significantly higher than those learning through lecture-centered instruction. In conclusion, LT method effect on underachiever's academic achievement and learning attitudes. As observed by the above results, a LT method should be an applicable to underachiever's education program plan as an effective means of enhancing their academic achievement and learning attitudes.
Keywords
LT(Learning Together)method; Underachiever; academic achievement; learning attitudes;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim boo-geom, A Effect of TAI method in underachiever's academic achievement and learning attitudes. Busan University graduate school master's thesis, 2004.
2 Kim hyeo-jung. A Effect of TAI model and STAD model in math problem solving. Korean school math association, 9(1), 2006.
3 Kim cheol-joo, A effective teaching skill. Yong-in: Kangnam University, 1999.
4 Park il-soo, A meta analysis on effect of cooperrative learning. KNUE graduate school master's thesis, 2005.
5 Kweon nak-won, A influence of TGT model in mathematical problem solving and attitudes. Learner-centered edu-association 7(1), 2006.
6 Yoon seon-mi, TAI fraction learning program development. Subject matter education association, 9(1), 2005.
7 Jung jung-jin, A effective instruction method of a special class. Yong-in: Kangnam University, 2000.
8 Amalya, N., The effects of cooperative learning instructional strategies on academic achievement among sixth-grade social student. doctoral dissertation, University of California, 1986.
9 Brophy, J., E., & Good, T. L., Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed, pp. 328-375). NY: Macmillan, 1988.
10 Damon, W., Peer education: The untapped potential. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 5, 331-343, 1984.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Davidson, N., Cooperative learning in mathematics: A Handbook of Teacher. Edited by Neil Davidson. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1990.
12 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson. R. T., Cooperative learning in mathematics education: News direction for elementary school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1989.
13 Johnson, D. W., & Johnson. R. T., Learning and together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1999.
14 Johnson, D. W., Johnson. R. T., & Stanne. M. B., Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. University of Minnesota, 2000.
15 Keller, J. M., Motivational design of instruction. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.). Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status(pp. 386-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1983.
16 Sharan, S., Cooperative learning in small groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement, attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational Research, 50, 241-271, 1980.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Singchai. W., Use of team assisted individualization method in mathematics learning of Prathom Suksa 5 students, 1999.
18 Slavin, R. E., Cooperative Learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1985.
19 Slavin, R. E., & Karweit, N. L., Cognitive and affective outcomes of intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Eduaction, 50, 29-35, 1981.   DOI
20 Slavin, R. E., Leavy, M., & Madden, N., Combining cooperative learning and individualized instruction: Effects on students mathematics achievement, attitudes, and behaviors. Elementary School Journal, 84, 409-422, 1984.   DOI
21 Kim min-han, A theory of curriculum for school teacher. Go-yang: Gongdongche, 2011.