1 |
McNamara, T. F., Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
|
2 |
O'Loughlin, K., The impact of gender in oral proficiency testing. Language Testing, 19(2), pp.169-192, 2002.
DOI
|
3 |
O'Sullivan, B., Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance, Language Testing, 19, pp.277-275, 2002.
DOI
|
4 |
Ross, S., Accommodative questions in oral proficiency interviews, Language Testing, pp.173-186, 1992.
|
5 |
Shohamy, E., The stability of oral proficiency assessment on the oral interview testing procedures. Language Learning, 33, pp.527-540, 1983.
DOI
|
6 |
Upshur, J. A., & Turner, C. E., Systematic effects in the rating of second language speaking ability: test method and learner discourse. Language Testing, 16(1), pp.82-111, 1999.
DOI
|
7 |
Young, R. & Milanovic, M., Discourse variation in oral proficiency interview., Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14, pp.403-424, 1992.
DOI
|
8 |
Wigglesworth, G., An investigation of planning time and proficiency level on oral test discourse. Language Testing, 14, pp.85-106, 1997.
DOI
|
9 |
Brown, A., Iwashita N., & McNamara, T., An Examination of Rater Orientations and Test-Taker Performance on English-for-Academic-Purposes Speaking Tasks, TOEFL Monograph Series, 29, Educational Testing Service, 2005.
|
10 |
Chalhoub-Deville, M., Deriving oral assessment scales across different tests and rater groups. Language Testing, 12, pp.16-33, 1995.
DOI
|
11 |
Chalhoub-Deville, M., Task-based assessments: Characteristics and validity evidence. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing, Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited, pp.210-228, 2001.
|
12 |
Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I., Second Language Fluency: Judgments on Different Tasks, Language Testing, 54(4), pp. 655-679, 2004.
|
13 |
Douglas, D., Quantity and quality in speaking test performance. Language Testing. 11, pp.125-143, 1994.
DOI
|
14 |
Lumley, T., & McNamara, T. F., Rater characteristics and rater bias: Implications for training. Language Testing, 12(1), pp.54-71, 1995.
DOI
|
15 |
Douglas, D., & Selinker, L., Analyzing oral proficiency test performance in general and specific purpose contexts. System 20, pp.317-328, 1992.
DOI
|
16 |
Joo, M., The need for an alternative Approach to Oral Testing. The English Teachers Association in Korea, 14(1), pp.1-20, 2008.
|
17 |
Lumley, T., Perceptions of language-trained raters and occupational experts in a test of occupational English language proficiency. English for Specific Purposes 17(4), pp.347-367, 1998.
DOI
|
18 |
Lynch, B. K., & McNamara, T. F., Using G-theory and many-facet Rasch measurement in the development of performance assessments of the ESL speaking skills of immigrants. Language Testing 15(2), pp.158-180, 1998.
DOI
|
19 |
Bachman, L. F., Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.
|
20 |
Bachman, L. F., Problems in examining the validity of the ACTFL oral proficiency interview. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 10(2), pp.149-164, 1988.
DOI
|
21 |
Bachman, L. F., Some reflections on task-based language performance assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), pp.452-47, 2002.
|
22 |
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S., Language testing practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
|
23 |
Bachman, L. F., & Savignon, S. J., The evaluation of communicative language proficiency: A critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview. The Modern Language Journal, 70(4), pp.380-390, 1986.
DOI
|
24 |
Bonk, W. J. & Ockey, G. J., A Many-Facet Rasch Analysis of the Second Language Group Oral Discussion Task. Language Testing 20(1), pp.89-110, 2003.
DOI
|
25 |
Brown, A., The effect of rater variables in the development of an occupation-specific language performance test. Language Testing, 12(1), pp.1-15, 1995.
DOI
|