Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.8.2818

An Evaluation Model of Information Quality of UCC Service Site  

Kang, So-Ra (Division of Digital Business, Hoseo University)
Kim, Yoo-Jung (Division of Digital Business, Hoseo University)
Lee, Hyun-Ju (Division of Digital Business, Hoseo University)
Moon, Yoon-Ji (Division of Digital Business, Hoseo University)
Kim, Woo-Dy (College of Business, Florida State University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society / v.11, no.8, 2010 , pp. 2818-2826 More about this Journal
Abstract
This research was conducted to develop a model appropriate for the measurement of information quality of UCC service site. The evaluation factors that reflect more improvement of the information utilization capability were verified. Enhancement of information utilization capability can control greater amount of information among the users and site companies, and among users. Therefore, Wikipedia, for example, provides a Web 2.0 based information quality that is more advanced than Web 1.0 by allowing effective control of information among the users. This type of information quality presents 'information reliability' and 'information stability' as evaluation factors added to the factors such as 'information sufficiency' and 'information usability.' Information reliability and information stability are essential factors that need to conduct an evaluation in the Web 2.0 environment that can distribute greater number of information in the environment where all the users serve as participants. Moreover, 'interesting information' and 'originality of information' suggests that information itself should include the attributes that can attract the attention of users, due to the nature of the Attention Economics, which points out one of the Web 2.0 phenomenon that the number of information consumers is smaller than that of information suppliers.
Keywords
UCC Service Site; Information Quality; Web 2.0; e-SQ;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 DeLone, W., and McLean, E. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable," Information Systems Research, Vol.3, No.1, pp.60-95, 1992.   DOI
2 이한희, 강소라, 김유정, "UCC 서비스 사이트의 신뢰가 UCC사용자에 미치는 영향," 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 제9권, 제12호, pp.759-776, 2009.   과학기술학회마을   DOI
3 이형석, 사회과학논문의 기초, 한경사, 2008.
4 전자신문, http//www.etnews.co.kr, 2009.
5 Amit, R., and Zott, C.,"Value Creation in E-Business," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, pp.493-520, 2001.   DOI
6 Anderson, P., "What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education," Joint Information Systems Committee, Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf, 2007.
7 Ariely, D., "Controlling the Information Flow: Effects on Consumers' Decision Making and Preferences," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.27, No.2, pp.233-248, 2000.   DOI
8 Bansal, H., McDougall,G.., Dikolli, S., and Sedatole, K. "Relating E-satisfaction to Behavioral Outcomes: An Empirical Study," The Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.18, No.4/5, pp.290-302, 2004.   DOI
9 Barnes, S., and Vidgen, R., "An integrative approach to the assessment of e-commerce quality,"Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.3, No.3, pp.114-127, 2002.
10 DeLone, W., and McLean, E. "The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.19, No.4, pp.9-30, 2003.   DOI
11 Dutta, S., and Segev, A. "Business Transformation on the Internet," European Management Journal, Vol.17, No.5, pp.466-476, 1999.   DOI
12 Evans P., and Wurster, T. Blown to Bits: How the New Economics of Information Transforms Strategy, Boston M.A.: Harvard Busienss School Press, 2000.
13 Gaudin, S., Companies Failing at Online Customer Service. Retrieved from http://itmanagement.earthWeb.com/erp/article.php/1588171, 2003.
14 Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E. and Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis (6th Edition), Pearson, 2006.
15 Liu, C. and Arnett, K.P. Exploring the factors associated with Web site success in the context of electronic commerce, Information & Management, Vol. 38, pp. 23-33, 2000.   DOI
16 Hu, L., and Bentler, P. M. "Cutoff Friteria for Fit Indexes in CovarianceStructure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives," Structural Equation Modeling, Vol.6, pp.1-55, 1999.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lazar, I.. "Creating Enterprise2.0 from Web2.0," Business Communications Review, Vol.37, No.8, pp.14-16, 2007.
18 Lennon, R. and J. Harris, "Customer Service on the Web: A Cross-Industry Investigation," Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, Vol.10, No.4, pp.325-38,2002.   DOI
19 LoCascio, R., A Web Site Is Not a Vending Machine. Retrieved from http://www.clickz.com/crm/onl_cust_serv/article.php/825521, 2000.
20 Dearstyne, B. W.,"Oh, My!,"Information Management Journal, Vol.41, No.4, pp.25-33, 2007.
21 Palmer, J.W., "Web site usability, design, and performance metrics", Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No.2, pp.151-67, 2002.   DOI
22 Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., and Malhotra, A. "A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality," Journal of Service Research, Vol.7, No.3, pp.213-233, 2005.   DOI
23 Pastore, M. Online Customer Service Still Has Work to Do. Retrieved from http://cyberatlas.internet.com/markets/retailing/article/0,,6061_577051,00.html, 2001.
24 Sprengers, J. "Objective Evaluation of Likely Usability Hazards - Preliminaries for User Testing," Rtrieved from http://www.abeleto.nl/resources/articles/objective1.html, 2004.
25 Zeithamal,V., Parasuraman, A., andMalhotra, A., "A Conceptual Framework for Understanding e-Service Quality: Implications for Future Research and Managerial Practice," working paper, report No.00-115, Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA., 2000.
26 Szymanski, D.M., and Hise, R.T. "E-satisfaction: An Initial Examination," Journal of Retailing, Vol.76, No.3, pp.309-322, 2000.   DOI
27 Yoo, B., and Donthu, N. "Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of an Internet Shopping Site (SITEQUAL)," Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, Vol.2, No.1, pp.31-45, 2001.
28 Yoon, S-J. "The Antecedents and Consequences of Trust in Online-Purchase Decisions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol.16, No.2, pp.47-63, 2002.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Loiacono, E., Watson, R. T., and Goodhue, D. "WebQualTM: A Web Site Quality Instrument," American Marketing Association's Winter Marketing Conference, Austin, TX, 2002.
30 Malhotra, N. Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (3rd ed.). Publisher: Pearson Education, 2006.
31 Nielsen, J.. Designing for usability. Indiana: New Riders Publications, 2000.
32 Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
33 Bauer, C. and Scharl, A. "Acquisition and Symbolic Visualization of Aggregated Customer Information for Analyzing Web Information Systems", Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-99). Vol.V, 1999.
34 Floh, A. and Treiblmaier H. " What Keeps the E-Banking Customer Loyal? A Multigroup Analysis of the Moderating Role of Consumer Characteristics on E-Loyalty in the Financial Service Industry", Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, Vol.7, No.2, pp. 97-110, 2006.
35 Wolfinbarger, M., and Gilly, M. "E-Tail: Dimensionalizing, Measuring and Predicting E-tail Quality," Journal of Retailing, Vol.79, No.3, pp.183-198, 2003.   DOI
36 Zeithamal,V., Parasuraman, A., andMalhotra, A. "Service Quality Delivery through Web Sites: A Critical Review of Extant Knowledge," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol.30, No.4, pp.362-375, 2002.   DOI
37 Ahmad, S., "Service Failures and Customer Defection: A Closer Look at Online Shopping Experiences," Managing Service Quality, Vol.12, No.1, pp.19-29, 2002.   DOI
38 Devaraj, S., Fan, M., and Kohli, R. "Examination of Online Channel Preference: Using the Structure-Conduct-outcome Framework," Decision Support Systems, Vol.42, No.2, pp.1089-1103, 2006.   DOI